What is a
"good" trigger?
I recently
met a fellow who was shooting a Colt Detective Special. We talked
about his gun a while, and I asked him if he'd had any action work
done to it. He said he hadn't; sure enough, on trying his gun, I
felt the typical Colt factory trigger - heavy and ugly. Since I
happened to be carrying my own Colt that day, I offered to let him
try it's trigger.
Surprise! He handed back with thanks, but opined that it "didn't
feel much better than mine."
ARE YOU FREAKIN' KIDDING ME??? Luckily, I resisted the
Homer-Simpson-like urge to strangle him. When I got back to the
shop, though, I wondered - why didn't he notice the phenomenal,
night-and-day difference between the guns?
It wasn't too long after that incident that I popped into a local
gunstore. This store often stocks guns from the custom shop of a
major revolver manufacturer (said shop being a Center for their
Performance handguns. Ahem.) They had a couple of examples, and I
asked to see them. The triggers were great in single action, but in
double action were hardly (if at all) better than their
run-of-the-mill production guns. I considered neither of them to be
a sign of quality action work.
As I was chatting with the clerk, a couple of fellows sauntered by
and asked to see the gun I had jut put down. They each tried the DA
trigger, exclaimed how great the action was, and agreed that this
particular maker "always has good triggers."
I was astounded; had I not been there, I wouldn't have believed we
were talking about the same gun!
After much thought, it occurred to me that the most folks are
simply unschooled on what makes a good trigger, and why anyone
should want one. After kicking myself for missing these "teachable
moments", I decided to help everyone become a more educated,
sophisticated revolver aficionado.
First
things first
There are
several aspect of a trigger's movement that, taken together,
comprise "trigger" or "action" feel.
Single action: Weight,
creep, feel, letoff, over-travel.
Double action: Weight,
consistency, feel, letoff, over-travel, return.
Physical characteristics: Width,
profile, surface.
Let's look at these one at a time, shall we?
Weight:
this is
simply the amount of force (in pounds) required to operate the
trigger. This is the aspect that most people pay attention to, as
it's the one thing which can be expressed by a number - and we
Americans love numbers! The trouble is that it's really not the
most important (within reasonable limits, of course) part of the
trigger. In single action, lighter is generally better, to the
point that it affects either ignition reliability or safety (a
hammer that won't stay cocked on its own or that is released so
easily that accidental discharges occur.)
In double action, reducing that weight can not only result in
misfires, but it also affects how positively the trigger returns.
I've also found that I need a certain amount of resistance to shoot
my best; my finger wants to feel some amount of pressure.
Overly light triggers can also mask an otherwise bad action. You'll
often hear people say that the best trigger job is lighter springs
- if you lighten the action, you won't feel as much through the
trigger. The trigger is still awful, but you don't notice it as
much. If you're happy with that, more power to you - but as you
become accustomed to what a quality trigger feels like, you'll find
that you like it less and less.
There is an old mantra with regard to trigger weight: smooth, not
light. You can shoot a smooth but heavy trigger better than a light
but gritty one.
Creep
(single action only): this refers
to the amount of movement before the sear releases. A gun with no
creep seems to break like the proverbial "glass rod" - regardless
of how heavy the trigger is, it seems to just release at the
perfect time. A trigger with lots of creep will move quite a bit
before the sear breaks; in general, a slight amount of creep is
acceptable, but excessive amounts are the sign of sloppy trigger
work. Exactly where the line between "slight" and "excessive" is
drawn depends on the individual shooter!
Consistency
(double action only): when a
trigger has the same pull weight from start to finish, it is said
to be consistent. Some triggers (Colt, Dan Wesson) continually
increase their pull weight toward the end of the stroke, an effect
called "stacking". Some triggers (S&W "J" frames) have a slight
decrease in pull weight before the sear releases, while others
start out at one weight, increase in the middle of the pull, then
decrease at the end.
In general, the more consistent the pull the easier it is to shoot;
however, some people like a bit of "stacking" in their actions, and
shoot best that way. A gun with decreasing pull weight is slightly
harder to shoot, and those with a "hump" in their pull are (at
least for me) the hardest of all to shoot.
A good trigger will have as consistent a pull weight as possible,
within the limitations of the gun's design and the shooter's
desire.
Feel:
ever pulled a
trigger that seemed to have sand in it? Or a trigger that felt like
running a stick down a picket fence? Both of those are examples of
bad action feel - the feedback given through a trigger as the
action's parts slide and rotate. The elimination of those
"artifacts" in the feel is a prime sign of a gunsmith's ability. A
good trigger should not have any roughness or hesitation in its
stroke, regardless of pull weight.
Letoff:
when the sear
releases, it should do so predictably and without abruptness. Many
triggers release with what can only be described as jerk, which
makes holding the sights steady at the moment of the bullet's exit
much more difficult.
Over-travel:
after the
sear breaks, the trigger should stop moving back. Trigger movement
after the sear releases is similar to a bad letoff; it can result
in the gun moving slightly when the bullet exits the muzzle, which
limits accuracy. Colt revolvers, because of their design, have no
over-travel; other makes control this through the use of trigger
stops (in various forms.) Interestingly, correcting over-travel can
usually make up for an abrupt letoff.
Return
(DA only): Jerry
Miculek, the greatest living revolver shooter, points out that the
trigger pull is only half - or even less - of the equation. Trigger
return is at least as important to successful double-action
shooting. Trigger return should be judged much like trigger pull:
no hesitation, no grittiness or roughness, consistent speed, and as
quick as the gun's design allows.
This aspect of trigger performance is one that many gunsmiths -
particularly those who are "generalists" - don't understand. I know
someone who owns a revolver customized by a very well-known
gunsmith. (So well known, in fact, that if you were to name the top
5 best-known and respected pistolsmiths in the country, this fellow
would be on that list. It is hard to pick up a gun magazine without
seeing his name someplace in its pages.) This fellow is renowned
for doing both autoloader and revolver work, and the gun bears his
trademark etched into the barrel.
The trigger pull is pretty good - not quite as consistent as I
would like, but it's not bad. The trigger return, however, is
atrocious. I've never felt a stock gun whose return was this bad,
let alone one worked on by one of the shining lights in the
pistolsmithing field! It literally feels like someone dumped sand
into that action - in stark contrast to the pull, which is nice and
smooth. So jarring is the juxtaposition of pull and release that it
is difficult to concentrate on shooting the thing.
A good trigger has a return as good as - or better than - its pull.
If your gunsmith doesn't understand this, switch
gunsmiths!
Physical
characteristics
While not
strictly part of the action itself, the shape and finish of the
trigger can greatly influence how the package feels. These aspects
are usually more personal preference than anything, but over the
years some general consensus has been reached.
Most revolver shooters agree that a trigger with a smooth, polished
face and well-rounded edges is to be desired. The surface should be
free of grooves or residual striations, have a perfect radius, and
polished to a mirror finish. The edges of trigger should be rounded
so that there is no discernible corner; the finger should slide
smoothly from one side to the other, and from top to bottom.
There are exceptions; for instance, Jerry Miculek is adamant about
the use of serrated (grooved) as an aid to speed shooting. Like I
said, it's about personal preference!
Width is important too - in general, the wider the trigger the
lighter the action will feel. (A narrow trigger can be made to feel
wider by finishing a flat portion down the middle one-third of its
face, and by rounding the edges just a bit less.) The back of the
trigger should be attended to - one with a sharp back edge/corner
will make itself felt. Lightly breaking those edges will eliminate
any pinching or chafing, particularly on those triggers which are
not terribly thick.
I hope this has helped you to understand just what is meant by the
term "good trigger". Handle lots of guns, both factory and custom,
and get used to evaluating them by the standards above. You'll find
yourself becoming a connoisseur in no time!
Of course, if you have any questions please click here to email
me!