AN
ADVENTURE: Spent some time last week
working on a project with Rob
Pincus. You'll have to wait a
while to hear the details, but a good and educational time was had
by all. (Yes, Rob, it's still
raining here.)
LUBRIPLATE
COMES THROUGH: Got an email from Alex
Taylor, a District Manager at Lubriplate. They're now selling the
superb SFL #0 grease in consumer quantities in their
online store! Comes in a 14oz can for
$23.01, plus shipping. Glad to see them recognizing the firearms
market; now let's see if we can get them to sell their FMO-AW oil
in small quantities too!
THIS
DOESN'T HAPPEN EVERY DAY: Remington recently announced
that they've produced their ten millionth 870 series
shotgun. I knew they were popular,
but ten freakin' million? I would never have guessed anything close
to that. The shotgun, it appears, is alive and well in
America.
THIS
IS JUST WRONG: I'll take some of what I
just said back: certain shotguns are alive, but not well.
Apparently trying to out-silly the S&W TRR8, Stoeger recently announced
the availability of the Double Defense - a tactical side-by-side
shotgun. Yes, a SxS with a fore-end rail. Black, of course. (Folks,
I couldn't possibly make up something like this. It takes a
marketing department to do so.)
I
CAN SEE CLEARLY NOW: A University of Alabama prof
has claimed to have invented a revolutionary sighting system
that promotes
"intuitive aim." Knowledgeable readers will recognize the concept
as being eerily reminiscent of the Steyr "trapezoid" sights as used
on the 'M' and 'S' series pistols, which have been available for a
decade now. Hmmm...
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: rob.pincus, lubrication, s&w, ugly, sights
Monday, August 03, 2009 Filed in:
General gun
stuff, My Life, Revolvers, Rifles
It appears that our spell of excessively hot weather has ended.
Last week the digital thermometer at our house recorded a high of
111 degrees. (Yes, that's in the shade - who'd be stupid enough to
go out into the sun on a day like that?) We set an all-time record
for consecutive days over 90 degrees (9 and counting.) I'm just
looking forward to being able to spend a full day (more or less) in
the shop.
---
From The Firearms Blog comes the news of a(nother)
special edition S&W 627 in .38
Super. This one should have a
sticker on the box that says "Now With More Ugly!"
---
I'm pleased to note that QC at Ruger is improving - the last couple
of SP101s I've seen, of recent production, are much improved over
those of years past. Gail Pepin at the
ProArms Podcast tells me that she's visited
the plant recently, and their production floor has changed
considerably. She credits their new emphasis on 'lean
manufacturing', with its attendant focus on reducing waste and
rework, for the quality bump.
---
The Firearms Blog also brings us happy news of Winchester's reprise
of the Model 92 Takedown. I'd be tempted if they'd
make it in .357 Magnum...
---
Now, if you'll excuse me, it's time to go to work!
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: bloggers, ugly, ruger, proarms, lever.actions
Wednesday, April 15, 2009 Filed in:
Revolvers, Self
defense
I recently received an email asking about the feasibility of
mounting a light on a revolver. The writer was concerned about
clearing his house at night and being forced to shoot one-handed
with a separate flashlight. Would it be possible, he asked, to
somehow mount a light to his wheelgun, to approximate those that
are widely mounted on autoloaders?
That's a tough one to answer, because it's really two questions in
one:
can it be done, and
should it be done.
I'll address the feasibility portion first: yes, it can be done,
though the approach varies a bit with the make/model. In all cases,
their are some limitations - mainly, the light has to clear the
ejector rod as it swings away from the frame. The larger the light,
the smaller the gun, and/or the more closely the light is mounted
to the bore axis or to the cylinder, the more likely it is to
interfere with proper cylinder opening.
The best choice is to make provision to mount the light in a
forward position, in front of the ejector rod. This is the approach
taken by S&W in their 327 TRR8:

The problem with this is that it makes activating the light on a
momentary basis from a firing grip difficult (if not impossible.)
One is left with the necessity to turn the light on and leave it on
if one wants to shoot with a two-handed grip.
To provide a platform on which the light can be mounted, a short
section of Picatinny rail can be attached (via screws) to the
barrel's underlug. If the particular gun doesn't have an underlug,
the barrel itself can be carefully drilled & tapped to accept
the rail - only, of course, if the barrel is of a bull (heavy)
configuration. There are also some clamp-on solutions
available.
The other half of the question is "should you?" I'll put on my
Tactical Tommy hat here, and say that I think it's a bad idea
except in very specific circumstances.
For a gun to be used in an ensconced position the attached light
has merit. All you're required to do is wait, and the light is
nothing but a shooting aid: confirm the target, and allow a clear
sight picture.
Using it to check your house, on the move, is another matter
entirely. In this case, the light takes on multiple functions:
navigation, search, identification, and (in the worst case)
shooting aid. The trouble is that if it's attached to your gun,
then you have a loaded weapon pointing in all sorts of directions
that proper safety habits say it shouldn't!
A loaded gun is not a tool for navigation or searching, and using
it as such is (in my opinion) irresponsible. Think of it this way:
would you be pointing your gun in all directions and places in the
daylight? I would hope that the answer would be 'no.' If that's the
case, why would you deem it acceptable to do so in the dark?
The light on the handgun is a limited-use device. Don't try to make
it into something it shouldn't be.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: tacticool, ugly, s&w