I received a couple of critical emails in regard tolast week's post about the
double tapand its applicability to
realistic defensive training. The gist of both, and sadly
predictable, was that I wasn't fit to polish the boots of Jeff
Cooper, who was an advocate of the practice.
My reply: one can question an opinion without being insolent to the
person who holds it. As individuals weshoulddo so, but as teachers
wemust.
I then referred them toan article called "Respectful
Irreverence"by Rob Pincus, which I first
read in 2008 and which marked a turning point in my outlook on the
training world. It's a classic that deserves a few minutes of your
time to read.
Just because I happen to disagree with someone doesn’t mean
that I don’t admire them or appreciate their contributions to
the field. At the same time, I don’t engage in hero worship -
it is not conducive to independent, critical thought.
I'll start today with what I didn't see: any big introductions from
the major revolver manufacturers. Smith & Wesson had a couple
of Performance Center variants (I'd not seen the Model 647
Varminter before), Ruger was showing the previously announced
four-inch SP101 in .38/.357 and .22LR (the smallbore having vastly
improved sights), while Colt didn’t show any double action
revolvers - and probably won't any time soon.
I had a great chat with Brent Turchi, the head of Colt's Custom
Shop. He said that new revolvers weren't in the cards for at least
a few years yet, and if they ever do release a new wheelgun it will
probably be something like a King Cobra or Anaconda, or perhaps a
lightweight concealed carry piece based on the SFVI/Magnum Carry
action.
The Python is gone for good, he said - too expensive to make, and
they no longer have the skilled workforce to do so even if they
could justify it economically. In fact, the people who today work
repairing Pythons are nearing retirement, and when they go a lot of
knowledge and skill will go with them. On the plus side, 2011 was a
very good year for Colt as they were able to sell tons of 1911s. Of
course.
The big handgun news at SHOT was the official U.S. introduction of
the Caracal pistol. This is a new polymer striker fired pistol made
in (of all places) the United Arab Emirates. Apparently the UAE has
decided that even their large oil reserves won't last forever, and
have decided to get into manufacturing firearms. Their first
products are full-size (think Glock 17) and compact (Glock 19-ish)
pistols in 9mm (.40 S&W versions will come later this year.)
The Caracal is the brainchild of Wilhelm Bubits, former Glock
employee and designer of the Steyr M series of pistols. His new
design borrows some elements from the Steyr, but most of it is
new.
I first heard about the Caracal when Rob Pincus went to Italy last
year and found a couple of his students armed with this unknown
handgun. Apparently it's been sold in Italy and a few other places
for almost two years, and the reports he got from those students
were glowing. The guns were used hard during the three days of
intense training, and there were no failures. That says a lot about
the design.
The Caracal is unusual in that everything inside the gun is
modular. The fire control group in the frame, as well as the
striker assembly in the slide, are modules that are quickly and
easily removed for service, and just as easily replaced. The bore
axis is very low, approaching that of an HK P7, while the slide
mass has been reduced. The result, I'm told from those who have
fired them, is reduced recoil impulse and muzzle rise.
Ergonomics, even for my small hands, are superb. The Caracal fits
me better than either the Glock or the Steyr, and I can even hit
the magazine release without too much contortion! The trigger is
very smooth, very linear (once you get past take-up, of course) and
has a nice, jar-free letoff. It's very impressive.
What is also impressive is the construction quality. The machining,
inside and out, is superb - the underside of their slide makes a
Glock look like a gravel road. Everything is polished, there are no
tool marks, and even the plastic castings are perfectly clean. This
is top-notch quality, an amazing feat for a young company.
Caracal was all over Vegas; all of the buses for the convention had
Caracal banners on their sides, their booth was large and set up
for doing lots of business, and their marketing materials were
big-league. The folks behind Caracal have invested a ton of money
into both the product and the marketing, and it's obvious that they
intend to be a big player in this business. If the product holds up
to its promise, I think they will be. (Oddly enough, despite
seemingly being on top of every little detail they still
haven’t gotten their USA website up - even though the URL is
printed on all their materials!)
I'm impressed with the gun, and so was nearly everyone I talked to
who'd seen it. I think this might be one of the top autoloading
pistol choices for defensive shooting, particularly when the
sub-compact versions come out later this year. Caracal is worth
watching.
Tom Givens is someone you should know. Tom and his wife Lynn
runRangemasterdown in Memphis, Tennessee,
where they teach people to protect themselves with a handgun.
Now, Tom and Lynn aren't your average instructors; while you may
not have heard of them, they command respect from the rest of us in
the defensive training field because of the top-flight instruction
they provide to their students. Rangemaster occupies a very
interesting place in the self defense universe because their
students have been involved in (at last count) over 60 self-defense
shootings -- with stunning results.
Memphis, as Tom tells me, is a very violent city that exists inside
of a strong self-defense gun culture. The result is that bad guys
in Memphis very often come up against legally armed good guys, and
if those good guys (and gals) trained at Rangemaster they almost
invariably come out on top.
Tom has taken the time to interview those students who had to pull
the trigger in self defense, and today has the best database of
private sector defensive shootings that exists. He's very thorough
in his debriefs, and because of that the rest of us have hard data
on which to base our training.
Recently Tom sat down with Rob Pincus and produced a DVD in the
Personal Firearms Defense series. Titled"Lessons From The Street", it details ten of his
student's incidents with lots of detail and lessons learned. I
recently got a copy, and it is definitely worth your effort to
acquire.
The realities that he presents may change your perceptions of what
actually happens in a fight, and can help you evaluate (and perhaps
change) your own training to reflect the realities of a criminal
attack.
Tom tells me that he’s still got a few copies left, and you
can get yours for $14.95 plus postage. To order, get your credit
card ready and give Rangemaster a call at 901-370-5600. It’s
a terrific and unique resource that you shouldn’t be
without.
This being a holiday week, I'm going to refrain from any major
articles. Black Friday, however, will feature an interesting piece
by Ed Harris! If you're tired of shopping, be sure to check in for
his exploration of a load that most of us know nothing about.
---
If you live near a Gander Mountain store, listen up! They're
buildingGander Mountain Academiesinto many of their stores,
and you need to check them out. They haven't gotten a lot of press
yet, but the GMAs are state-of-the-art shooting facilities unlike
any others. Combining both live fire and computer simulation
ranges, they provide a shooting experience that very few places
can. These are major investments, and they show that Gander
Mountain is serious about firearms training.
All
of their locations can be video conferenced together, which is (to
the best of my knowledge) the first time any shooting facility has
done so. The great thing is that they can have a senior instructor
in one location who can watch people in all other locations, and
provide two-way feedback on what they're doing and how to correct
errors. This is going to give people across the country far greater
access to top-flight instructors than has ever been seen in this
field.
The first such class is going to be with Rob Pincus, who will be
teaching Dynamic Defensive Handgun on December 17th and 18th. If
you've got a Gander Mountain Academy near you, take advantage of
this opportunity to be at the leading edge of shooting
education!
---
Have you gotten your copy of theGun Digest Book Of The Revolveryet? It's my new
book dealing with all aspects of owning and shooting the double
action revolver, and it's getting rave reviews. Even my lawyer said
that he didn't expect a gun book to be this good! Get a copy now
for yourself, and be sure to pick one up for each of your shooting
friends. (Remember: orders over $25 at Amazon ship for free!There’s also a Kindle
version!)
I returned yesterday from a long weekend at the 2011Combat Focus Shooting Instructor
Conference. (If you were wondering why
there was no blog on Friday or Monday, now you know.)
The annual Conference is a chance for active Combat Focus Shooting
(CFS) instructors to get together with peers to exchange ideas,
learn new concepts, develop skills, and have a little fun at the
same time. In this conference we looked at some of the latest
information about how attacks happen and how the body reacts to
them, and asked ourselves how that changes what we teach and how we
teach it. We learned and we grew.
This DNA-level commitment to progress is one of the things that
sets the CFS program far apart from others. In any field of human
endeavor perspective changes along with knowledge, and defensive
skills are no different. Collectively we learn more every day about
how to survive deadly encounters; the problem is that so very few
instructors or programs are truly committed to evolving with that
increasing knowledge.
Let's face it: humans are often resistant to change, particularly
when that change means admitting that we are in some way wrong.
When we have a lot of ego investment in what we do and how we do
it, it becomes darn near impossible to make substantive changes
even when they're really necessary.
For instance, I've always considered myself reasonably fit. I'm no
athlete, but owing to the heavy work I do around our homestead I'm
in better shape than at least half of the people my age. As I
learned this weekend I still need some work in that area, and it's
important because fitness is critical to long-term survival. Being
fit not only helps you survive a deadly attack, but also helps you
to survive equally life-threatening but far more common things like
heart disease and diabetes. Only by stepping away from my ego am I
able to see that and make the changes I need to make.
In CFS we're able to make progress, to evolve our program,
precisely because of this lack of ego. Don't get me wrong: there
are a lot of Type-A personalities in our group, but very little
ego. I know that sounds contradictory, but it's not! One can be
very committed and very driven with regard to a topic without the
exaggerated self importance that comes from ego.
Colleague Ricardo Pipa put it best: “we lack ego, we are
collaborative." We acknowledge that sometimes new knowledge makes
old positions untenable, and we change those positions to the
benefit of our students and the defensive shooting community as a
whole. That's what makes CFS, in the words of founder Rob
Pincus,the most
progressive defensive shooting program"on the planet."
On a personal note I progressed toward a couple of additional
certifications: one for the rifle (Combat Focus Carbine) and one
for a new program aimed at absolute beginners in the defensive
shooting world (more on that later.) I don't yet know if I passed
either one - CFS instructor certifications are notoriously
difficult to acquire - but I hope to hear good news later this
week.
Regarding my fellow CFS instructors, I don't wish to be maudlin.
I'll close simply by saying that they are, in the words of the
original Hawkeye Pierce, "the Finest Kind."
On Monday, Rob Pincus posted a note on theI.C.E. Training Facebook pageabout his
opposition to open carry (OC). This is one of Rob's personal 'hot
button' issues, and he doesn't shy away from the debate. (Rob
doesn't shy away from much, actually, but particularly so with
regards to this topic.) It garnered a lot of attention, making the
cut at both Gunnuts and Say Uncle (amongst others.)
Given my association with Rob and I.C.E., it wasn't terribly
surprising that I should receive an email asking, in essence, if I
agree with everything he says. Sometimes yes, sometimes a little
less so, but not for the reasons you might think.
On the self defense aspects, I think OC when concealed carry (CC)
is available (which is darned near all of the country these days)
is silly. I won't debate that point of view at this time, but for
now I'll just say that I don't believe OC has any advantage over CC
from a tactical standpoint.
On the social and political fronts the situation is a little less
clear. I often wonder if the civil rights activists of the 1960s
and the gay rights activists of more recent memory would have made
the gains they did without their open and sometimes controversial
exercise of their rights. Just fifty years ago restaurants and
theaters were routinely segregated; thanks to the confrontational
activities of civil rights advocates, today integration is so
normal that we don't even think about it. The same could be said
for abortions and being openly gay.
Whether you agree or disagree with those subjects isn't important
to this discussion - what is important is that what was normal was
changed, thanks to people who were willing to stand up for their
rights and risk ridicule and arrest to mold society's
opinions.
To say that such activity was acceptable for them, but not for
Second Amendment advocates, seems on the surface to be a little
inconsistent.
OC activists insist they're doing the same things for the same
reasons, and on the surface it's a hard argument to dismiss. I do
think, however, that there is a big difference between open
carriers and civil rights marchers: the rights being defended here
are already well established (if not in fashion), and are subject
to a different standard of comportment. It's called "just because
you can, doesn't mean you should."
Rosa Parks was doing something that the law said she couldn't. Open
carriers are doing something that the law already says they can.
That doesn't seem like a huge difference, but it is.
If OC advocates were carrying guns in areas where laws unjustly say
they can't, then I'd support them fully. The problem is they're
not, and in my opinion that removes the civil rights rationale from
their argument. Carrying a gun openly in a city like Portland,
where it is against the law, is advocating for change and pushing
people to recognize other's civil rights. Doing it in an area where
it's allowed, even if uncommon and misunderstood, is usually just
grandstanding.
I understand the argument that rights which are not exercised are
ripe for abrogation, and that OC is a strong exercise of Second
Amendment rights. That doesn't mean one needs to do so from a
posture of defiant confrontation, which seems to be the norm for
open carriers. We already possess those rights, and it's incumbent
upon us to exercise them responsibly and intelligently. Like it or
not, that means not scaring the public.
Yes, people who are scared of the sight of guns are irrational. I
agree. Yes, cops who don't know the nuances of the law are
ignorant. I agree. Getting belligerent in public isn't going to
change either of those. Want to advocate for actual social change?
Open carry in a city where it's illegal; get arrested like the
civil right marchers did, then use that to help publicize your case
for the repeal of unjust and unconstitutional laws.
That's real political activism. Being a contentious loudmouth on
YouTube isn’t.
Rob Pincus asked one of his favorite questions on the (members
only) U.S. Concealed Carry forum last week: "what have you changed
your mind about?"
It's a simple question, and it's amazing how many people couldn't
answer it. The most common reply sounds like something from a
cookie-cutter PR firm: "Of course the world is in a constant state
of change, and the prudent man, woman, or transgender individual is
best advised to take note of such change and incorporate that which
is applicable to his or her current situation to prepare for the
future." Reading some of the responses reminded me of the old joke
about the politician talking about prohibition: "some of mah
friends are for it, and some of mah friends are against it. I tell
you here and now, that I stand forthrightly behind mah
friends!"
The question isn't concerned about what's changed around you, but
rather in what has changed inside of you.
We all make decisions and adopt opinions based on any number of
inputs, including raw evidence, our emotional reactions to factual
information, and (all too often) what someone else thinks about
those things. The problem is that we tend to treat those opinions
and conclusions as static even as the world around us shifts. At
some point our original positions are likely to become outdated,
and some will be downright wrong. It's whether - and why - we make
a conscious decision to amend or replace those positions that's
important. If we're observant and engaged, we change our minds
about things. If not, we persist in beliefs and practices that may
not be congruent with the current realities.
Prejudices are like that. My late father grew up in a time and a
place where anyone with white skin was deemed to be of lesser
intelligence, honesty, and motivation. ("Stupid, lazy liars" in the
vernacular.) Over the years he would be put into contact with one
ethnic group after another and be forced to change his opinion of
that group. Unfortunately he wasn't able to extrapolate those
experiences to cover all ethnicities, but he was at least able to
find common ground with Japanese, Hispanic, American Indian, and
Chinese people. He changed his mind based on his first-hand
experiences.
That kind of change is hard for some of us because it means
admitting that, in some way, we're wrong about something. That
might be because we misinterpreted something along the way, or it
might mean that new facts or evidence were uncovered. It might mean
that we relied too much on others to shape our opinions for us, or
it might simply mean that we've grown up. We might have been right
at one point, but the growth of the rest of society rendered our
original position untenable.
Whether we changed or the universe changed is irrelevant to this
discussion; what's important is how we ourselves adapt to that
change. Can we accept new facts and evidence, or are we going to
bury our heads in the sand?
Case in point: for a long time I've held an opinion about Taurus
revolvers that is now evolving, based on their increasing levels of
quality. Am I ready to put them on the same level as the market
leaders - S&W and Ruger? Not quite, but I am willing to admit
that perhaps they are making headway in product quality. I'm
revisiting my opinions in response to what's going on around me,
and I look forward to the day when I can say I've changed my mind
about them.
Don't assume that I'm talking only about physical things (people,
guns.) I'm also talking about concepts. How and what we train is
subject to the same dynamic of change. For instance, I used to
practice and teach one-handed shooting with the gun canted strongly
toward the centerline. The idea is that it straightened the wrist
(which it did) and increased recoil control (which it also did.)
The problem is that it's much harder for the eye/brain combination
to correctly align the gun on target when both the x- and y-axis
are in abnormal positions. This is especially true when shooting
quickly, as it significantly degrades one’s balance of speed
and precision. The increase in recoil control, which enables the
shooter to get back on target faster, is negated by the increased
time required for the shooter to recognize and apply the necessary
deviation control.
My opinion was wrong because I focused on an overly narrow aspect
of the shooting task. I changed my mind based upon a broader
understanding of what I was trying to achieve, and as a result no
longer teach or practice that technique.
What specifically have you changed your mind about? What do you
consciously believe or practice today that's different than, say, a
year or two ago? Why?
Back in Aprilthe Personal Defense Network published an interview
with yours truly, wherein I opined that the
future of defensive training would be integration: a fluid
combination of both armed and unarmed responses. This month, we've
been greeted with a big endorsement of that trend with the
appearance of Rob Pincus on the cover ofBlack Belt
Magazine.
The Black Belt article on Rob deals specifically with why and how
unarmed combatives trainers should include armed responses in their
repertoire. It's a good article, and you should pick up a copy of
the magazine and read for yourself. I'm sure that there are some
pure martial artists who will wail and gnash their teeth at the
prospect, but the trend is now clear -- both sides have observed
the same dynamics, and are headed in (roughly) the same
direction.
I spent this weekend up at theFirearms Academy of
SeattleteachingCombat Focus
ShootingwithRob
Pincus. This was the last leg in
Rob's cross-country spring training tour, and a chance for me to
see how he's pushed the state-of-the art forward in the year since
we last taught together.
I've said that all instructors should jump at the chance to teach
with (or at least observe without the distraction of being a
student) a better instructor than themselves. It's especially
useful to pick an instructor whose style -- and even material, in
some cases -- is very different from one's own. It gives a fresh
perspective and reveals the blind spots that we all develop over
time.
This weekend was no exception. I came away with a whole bunch of
new ideas that I hope to incorporate in my own work.
We had a good group of students, including one who had just
recently bought his first gun. I always get a thrill out of
watching someone go from zero to doing pretty complex tasks in just
a couple of days, and this fellow really gave it his all. Two of
the students were experienced instructors themselves and found that
their first exposure to the advanced CFS exercises was as
challenging to them as it was to everyone else.
Because the students were at various stages of ability, some came
with bad habits from prior training. They weren't bad in the sense
of being unsafe or dangerous but rather in the sense of not being
appropriate to the task of surviving the sudden, chaotic events on
which CFS focuses. We were able to have a good conversation about
this important idea of context: that skills need to be judged in
relation to the goal (efficiently making the bad guy go away after
he's surprised you), and not to some separate and arbitrary
measurement.
Marty and Gila Hayes, who run the Academy, are great hosts who
bring in programs like Combat Focus Shooting in order to give their
students a well-rounded view of the defensive firearms world. Even
though CFS doctrine doesn't always agree with theirs, they know
that perspective is important in this field. There are very few --
if any -- schools who are confident enough in the quality of their
own programs to expose their students to new ideas. That's why FAS
has evolved and stayed fresh over the years where other schools
have become insular and hidebound.
Now if you'll excuse me I need to treat a badly sunburned elbow;
apparently I missed a spot when applying the sunscreen!
Over at the Personal Defense Network,they've put up a profile of yours
truly. Based on an interview I
did recently, it covers my views on teaching and the state of the
training business. Hope you enjoy it!
Gosh, thanks for the tremendous response! I managed to divert a few
more copies, so everyone who responded should get one.
_________________________________________________
Exactly a year ago I mentioned that I'd just finished a project
with Rob Pincus, but I couldn't yet talk about it. Today I reveal
all!
We collaborated on a DVD in his renowned "Personal Firearm Defense"
series. Titled - what else? - "Defensive Revolver Fundamentals", it
features Rob and yours truly talking about and demonstrating a
variety of issues related to the revolver in self defense. It
turned out great!
The DVD has been released through the NRA's Personal Defense DVD
Collection, and perhaps one other venue as well. I hope to have
them for sale here at grantcunningham.com after the first of the
year.
I managed to snag some extra copies for myself. I'm
going to give a few lucky readers of my blog a chance to get their
own copy for FREE! All you need to do is answer this question:What
present does Ralphie Parker wish for?The first twelve (get it?)
people to email the answer will get their very own copy of
"Defensive Revolver Fundamentals", autographed by me. (Just
remember that comments here on the blog don't count - you have to
email me in order to get in on this deal!)Good
luck!
-=[
Grant ]=-
P.S.: Those who know me,
or have seen pictures of me, may be surprised that I'm not wearing
my glasses in this DVD. The director's first question when setting
up the lighting was "do you need those glasses for anything?"
"Well, only if I want to see..." Apparently that wasn’t
sufficiently important, and I ended up spending two days thinking
"don't squint at the camera, don't squint at the camera!" Such is
the price of stardom, I’m told.
The Outdoor Channel hosts a variety of shooting shows these days,
and here's our chance to encourage them to show more!
Every year they have a contest, called the Golden Moose Awards (I
know, I know) for the fan's favorite shows. Visitors to their site
can vote in several categories, including Best New Series, Favorite
Series, and Favorite Host. I encourage everyone to vote!
Why? (Other than the chance to win some cash?) Because the staple
of most outdoor programming is the old fashioned huntin' and
fishin' show. They dress them up with different hosts (why oh why
do they always have southern accents?) but the format remains the
same. It appeals to a specific demographic, one that despite a
lifetime of hunting and fishing I just don't fit. (Fishing on
television is substantially more boring than golf on television.
Hard to believe but true.)
Outdoor Channel has taken some gambles by lessening their
dependence on the blaze orange crowd and putting on some general
shooting shows: American Shooter, Impossible Shots, Shooting
Gallery, and more. The last couple of seasons they've taken bigger
risks with dedicated tactical/training shows: SWAT Magazine TV, The
Best Defense, and American Guardian. It's time to show them that we
appreciate their programming!
The Revolver Liberation Alliance endorses specific candidates in
the Golden Moose Awards. Please go toOutdoor
Channel's voting pageand cast your ballots for
the following:
Fan Favorite Best Overall Series: The Best Defense
Fan Favorite New Series in 2010: S.W.A.T. Magazine TV
Fan Favorite Hunting Series: - No Choice -
Fan Favorite Fishing Series - No Choice -
Fan Favorite Host(s): Rob Pincus
You only get one vote (even if you do live in Chicago), so make it
count!
Two people I know have started new blogs in the last week or so,
and I believe they're both worth your time to check out.
Fellow instructor Omari Broussard and I met at the Combat Focus
Shooting Instructor Development courseI recently
mentioned. Omari's done a lot of
training in armed and unarmed combatives, and he's kept a logbook
(multiple logbooks, actually) of all the courses he's attended. His
blog is called, appropriately enough, theTraining Log
Blog.
Keeping a training log is an idea endorsed by a wide range of
instructors. Doing so gives you a legal record, a way of reminding
yourself of lessons learned, a chronology of your development as a
student, a chronicle of your evolution in thought, or perhaps just
an opportunity to reminisce about good times and good people. A
training log is all of these things, and more. So important is this
process that Rob Pincus wrote the Training Log Book to make it
easier to keep up with the task.
In my case I've been remiss about doing this. Despite my slightly
OCD nature I've just not been as disciplined about this as I should
be. Omari, however, has kept detailed logs over the past several
years, and his blog is all about sharing those many entries with
you. Expect to learn what's important to him, what he's changed his
mind about, and how he's grown through what he's learned. Omari's
blog stands a good chance of becomingthemust-read blog for those who
are serious about their training and personal growth. He's off to a
great start.
Speaking of Rob Pincus (what a segue!), you're probably familiar
with him from his articles in SWAT Magazine - or perhaps his
television appearances, his DVD instructional series, or maybe even
his books (the aforementioned Training Log Book, and his
essentialCombat Focus Shooting: Evolution
2010.) Rob's always in the
public eye, but there's something you don't know about him.
He's homeless. By choice. He decided that would be a good name for
a blog, and so it was born.
TheHomeless By Choice
blogdetails Rob's life without a
permanent residence. Rob travels more than three hundred days a
year, and a while back he decided that it was silly to maintain a
home base that he never saw. He put all his stuff in storage and
resolved to live on the road as a preferred condition.
I know that doesn't sound so unusual, as many people live full time
in motorhomes and have no fixed residence, but Rob doesn't have an
RV - he lives in hotels with what he can carry on his back! The HBC
blog covers his life on the road: where he goes, what he does,
where he stays, the people he meets and the things he sees.
If you ever wanted to read a blog where you could actually live
vicariously through someone else, HBC is definitely it!
I haven't done a Wednesday Wanderings post for a while, but since I
took the holiday off what would have been posted Monday got
shuffled to today.
So, what's going on in the world? Well,Tam continues her slide to a greener
lifestyle. She's almost to the point
where she could move to Portland and lobby for more bike paths to
further clog traffic. (I'll bet she's developed a taste for tofu,
too.)
TheFirearm Blog recently posted a great old television
commercialfor the Mattel "Tommy Burst"
gun. Someone I knew as a kid had one of these, though for the life
of me I can't remember who it was nor do I remember the commercial.
I do, however, remember the sound the bolt made as it was pulled
back. Fun toy that would cause apoplexy of sold today. (Readers of
a certain vintage will recognize the voice of the narrator and the
face of the bad guy as both belonging toHal
Smith, the great character actor
and voice artist.)
Gabe Suarez recently posted an interesting article of the value
ofsimplicity in training. I don't necessarily agree
with everything he says, but his point about not having unlimited
time to train is spot-on. That point alone deserves an entire
article.
As if the Judge phenomenon couldn't get any sillier, I give you
theTactical Judge. Make of it what you
will.
Rob Pincus recently returned from a teaching stint in South Africa,
where he made this video of a Glock suppressor that he (and I)
didn't even know existed. Square (of course), made of plastic (what
else?), and disposable (!!), it fits on a special barrel that Glock
also sells.
Cool stuff, but why in 'repressed' South Africa are these things
freely available, but here in the 'free' United States are they
demonized and heavily regulated?
On Friday and Saturday I did my annual duty at a local high
school's all-night graduation party. For several years I've
volunteered as part of their security detail, making sure the kids
stay safe from both internal and external threats. (This, despite
having no children of my own! How did I get talked into this?) It
starts every year at about 10:pm and goes until breakfast the next
morning.
I usually get a long nap Friday afternoon before the event, but
this year I couldn't do it. Not in the sense that I didn't have
time, but because I just couldn't fall asleep in the middle of the
day! The net result is that I ended up going 24+ hours without
sleep, and I'm just not used to that kind of thing! After it was
over I crawled into bed and dropped right off to sleep. Saturday
was essentially toast.
Sunday I worked my way up to The English Pit range in Vancouver USA
to help out at a Combat Focus Shooting/Advanced Pistol Handling
class with Rob Pincus. Jeff Varner, one of my fellow Combat Focus
instructors, hosted the course at what is his home range. Great
class.
After class Randy, the club's owner, brought out his Mateba Unica
6. Rob thought the Unica to be mythical, but here is a picture of
him shooting the .44 Magnum beast as Randy looks on in
amusement:
(I have another pic of Rob which is far more embarrassing. I'm
keeping that one in my files as "insurance"!)
Non-related note: the best arrangement of the tune "It Might As
Well Be Spring" is on the 1961 Stan Kenton "Adventures in Jazz"
album. I don't have the liner notes handy, but I believe it's a
Gene Roland arrangement.
I'm pretty sure the delay was due to the amount of editing
required. We were up at theFirearms Academy of
Seattle, and Gila Hayes had
insisted that I try a dessert she'd made - some sort of brownie
mocha torte. Near as I can tell it starts with a 55 gallon drum of
concentrated chocolate extract which is somehow crammed into an 8"
square cake pan. I usually don't eat such rich (and sugary and
caffeinated) desserts, and it left me 'wired' for a couple of
hours. You can actually hear me slow down toward the end as the
effects wore off. My wife thought it was hilarious. Some of the
sillier stuff was thankfully left on the cutting room floor (free
tip: never do an interview while on a sugar high, unless you want
to sound like a deranged chipmunk.)
Most common phrase not heard in the interview: “you can edit
that out, right?” I’m sure I added immeasurably to
Gail’s blooper reel!
Much as I like bragging about myself, the cool thing is that the
other interview on this episode is withRob
Pincus! Rob's interview was done a
little over a month ago, just after I finished his Instructor
Development class, and Gail thought the two interviews would make a
good match. She's right as usual. (Thanks to the mocha torte, this
is the only time you'll ever hear me able to talk nearly as fast as
Rob!)
I spent the weekend up atFIrearms Academy of
Seattleteaching aCombat Focus Shootingclass with "the
man",Rob
Pincus. We had one bright, sunny
day (got the sunburn to prove it!) and one exceptionally wet, cold,
dark day. That's life in the Pacific Northwest!
We had a diverse group of just under 20 students, some of whom were
"advanced practitioners" and some who were significantly less
experienced. From the comments in the mandatory end-of-class
debrief, everyone came away learning something about themselves and
about how to survive a deadly encounters. How fortuitous that the
course is designed to do exactly those things!
(If you're an instructor, one of the best things you can do is to
teach with another instructor, preferably one who style is very
different from your own. I learned as much about my ability to
teach as the students learned about their ability to shoot. It
pushes your limits, identifies areas where you need to improve, and
gives you a different perspective on the art of teaching.)
Rob Pincus' original book onCombat Focus Shootingwas published in
2006, and in a very few pages - 120, give or take - managed to
present an entirely new way of looking at defensive handgun
training.
Instead of forcing contrived techniques onto a fight, techniques
that might not be appropriate or even effective, CFS offered a
radically different perspective: pay attention to how the body
reacts to a threat, base your techniques on what works well with
those reactions, and train in those techniques as often and as
realistically as possible. It was a concept-driven philosophy, and
stood in stark contrast to the majority of training that was (and
remains) technique-driven.
CFS sounds simple, and at its core it is. The concepts that back it
up, however, draw from many fields, and explaining them in writing
takes a bit of space. The brevity with which the original book it
was written meant that some parts of the program didn't get the
exploration or explanation they deserved.
At the same time the Combat Focus Shooting courses, which were the
origin of the book, were evolving. Much new material was added, and
there were changes to the way the program looked at certain aspects
of defensive handgunning. It was time to update the book.
What an update Pincus has brought us!
"Combat Focus Shooting - Evolution 2010" is not just a simple edit.
It's been greatly expanded, now over 210 pages and with very little
fluff. Gone is the minimalist treatment of the concepts that
underlie the program; the new book feels luxurious in comparison,
with every facet of the Combat Focus philosophy explored and
explained. The new edition makes it easier to understand what CFS
is all about and especially why it's different from other courses.
It's much more readable and closely follows the path of a live CFS
class.
Of coursenothing beats taking a CFS course in
person, but this book will give
you a good grounding in the concepts and science behind intuitive
shooting. If you want to develop defensive shooting skills that
reflect the realities of actual encounters, "Combat Focus Shooting
- Evolution 2010" should be on your reading list. It's a must-have
for every serious student of defensive handgunning.
Being fundamentally lazy (which I now realize to be 'efficient' -
CFS students will get the joke), I'm just going to let you read his
great thoughts while I attend to other matters.
I just returned from a visit to Virginia Beach, where I attended
theCombat
Focus ShootingInstructor Development
(CFSID) course. I've been searching my brain for a one-word
description of what the class is like, and this is the only thing
that even comes close:
OhHolyCrap.
We spent 4 days and just shy of 60 hours learning the ins and outs
of Combat Focus Shooting so that we could accurately and
efficiently communicate the program to students. We spent the first
of those day on the range...no, that's not quite right; for any
other course itwould havebeen the first day, but for
us it was roughly half of the first day, as the entire session ran
well past 9pm. The rest of the week was spent not on becoming
better shooters, but learning to be better teachers.
We studied a little of everything: anatomy, physiology,
neurophysiology, psychology, philosophy, and more. By the end of
the fourth day, which is when testing was done, my brain was fried.
I don't even remember the final written test, but I do remember
nearly passing out somewhere on page three (serious blood sugar
drop, complete with tremors and sweating.)
Apparently I finished it. At least, I think I did!
This isn't like most other instructor courses. Most of the time, an
instructor certificate is a matter of showing up, shooting well,
and having your check clear. CFSID is different;Rob
Pincusis committed to producing
good teachers, not just good demonstrators. That showed in the
caliber (pardon the pun) of the people who were there, as I'd be
confident in recommending any one of them as a competent and
knowledgeable instructor.
There's a reason that, historically, less than 50% of Combat Focus
Shooting instructor candidates pass the course. It's that tough,
and takes a phenomenal amount of mental discipline just to make it
through.
----
As it happens, my return trip routed me through Chicago, where I
spent nearly three hours waiting for my next flight. Turns out
thatTam was in Chicago at the same
time. Wish I'd known, I'd have
loved to finally meet her.
----
We also got to study some (unintentional) modern art, courtesy of
an ancient video projector that refused to hold a sync signal with
Rob's new MacBook:
Yes, that's Rob Pincus getting all Warhol on his students.
----
I don't usually plug local businesses, but this one deserves
it.
The day before I left, I discovered that my old camera had died. It
powered up, but none of the controls worked. (It will still take
pictures, but the exposure control is fried and the autofocus
appears to be only sporadically active.) We had planned to upgrade
our camera later this year, but this forced our hand: we needed it
now.
I spent that day not packing, but running all over Western Oregon
to find the camera I'd decided on. I finally found the body, but
the lens I wanted wasn't in stock anywhere. I decided to pick up a
used optic as stopgap measure, while I waited (and recovered
financially) for the one I really wanted. Trouble is that none of
the camera stores I called carried much (or any) used equipment.
About that time I remembered seeing a yellow pages ad for a little
one-hour photo place located in a small town fairly close to us. I
had it in my mind that the ad said something about used cameras,
and since phone calls are free I dialed their number. A pleasant
young lady answered the phone and said that yes, they had used gear
and that they had several suitable lenses for me.
What I found when I walked intoFocal Point
Photographyblew me away. This is a tiny
shop, located in a small farming community in a rural area, and it
is filled with photo gear. From Speed Graphics to the Canon EOS 5D
Mark II, these folks have a little of everything. Piles of used
gear (literally), a surprising selection of lighting equipment new
and old, even darkroom stuff, all stuffed (literally) into a
two-story building in little ol' Dallas, Oregon. It was like going
back in time, to what camera stores used to be before the age of
big-box homogenization. I don't know if they do mailorder, but
they're so accommodating I suspect they would. If you're looking
for just about anything photographic, particularly if it's out of
production and now hard to find, give them a call: (503)
623-6300.
I have no affiliation other than as a satisfied, if somewhat
amazed, customer.
Well, it turns out that I'm not alone at the Blessed Bovine
Abattoir -Rob Pincus has a new videoup at the
Personal Defense Network giving his take on the concept of the
stance. Watch it with an open mind.
This week is dominated by SHOT Show news, and in the midst of all
the shiny new goodies it's hard to remember that self defense isn't
just about hardware. Guns and ammo are easy to write about, so
that's what most people concentrate on. As a result, you find lots
of sites that deal with hardware, but precious few with the
software so necessary for survival.
PDN is the new source for self defense articles, tips, and video
lessons on the net. Rob Pincus, the Managing Editor, has gathered
some of the best authorities from around the country to staff PDN,
with a simple goal: PDN aims to be the leading destination of
high-quality, personal defense content online, as well as a
no-nonsense gathering place for those serious about arming
themselves for defense in every aspect of their lives.
This isn't the same old "9mm vs. .45ACP" stuff you find in the
magazines or on the gun forums - the information at PDN is at a
higher level. You'll learn some new techniques, some refinements of
your existing skills, and some vital topics that other sites just
won't touch (check out "Dealing with a Gun Shot Wound During Training
Class".)
It isn't all about guns, either; self defense is more than simply
shooting people, and PDN delivers vital information to help you
expand your hand-to-hand and less lethal skills
("Don't Bring A Gun To A Knife
Fight" is a great introduction to
why the gun isn't always the right answer.)
There's lots more, from fitness to legalities to tactics, all
written by some of the best people in the business. You'll hear
from master trainer Rob Pincus as well as suchrenowned expertsas Tony Blauer, Michael
Janich, John Brown, Marty Hayes, Andy Langlois, Kent
O’Donnell, and Paul Haberstroh. (Oh, and some guy named Grant
Cunningham - anyone know who he is?)
Check out the site, watch the videos, read the articles, andjoin
the forum. Check in often, as there's
a lot more great content coming at PDN.
AN
ADVENTURE:Spent some time last week
working on a project withRob
Pincus. You'll have to wait a
while to hear the details, but a good and educational time was had
by all.(Yes, Rob, it's still
raining here.)
LUBRIPLATE
COMES THROUGH:Got an email from Alex
Taylor, a District Manager at Lubriplate. They're now selling the
superb SFL #0 grease in consumer quantities in theironline store! Comes in a 14oz can for
$23.01, plus shipping. Glad to see them recognizing the firearms
market; now let's see if we can get them to sell their FMO-AW oil
in small quantities too!
THIS
DOESN'T HAPPEN EVERY DAY:Remington recently announced
that they've produced theirten millionth 870 series
shotgun. I knew they were popular,
but ten freakin' million? I would never have guessed anything close
to that. The shotgun, it appears, is alive and well in
America.
THIS
IS JUST WRONG:I'll take some of what I
just said back: certain shotguns are alive, but not well.
Apparently trying to out-silly theS&W TRR8, Stoeger recently announced
the availability of theDouble Defense- a tactical side-by-side
shotgun. Yes, a SxS with a fore-end rail. Black, of course. (Folks,
I couldn't possibly make up something like this. It takes a
marketing department to do so.)
I
CAN SEE CLEARLY NOW:A University of Alabama prof
has claimed to haveinvented a revolutionary sighting systemthat promotes
"intuitive aim." Knowledgeable readers will recognize the concept
as being eerily reminiscent of the Steyr "trapezoid" sights as used
on the 'M' and 'S' series pistols, which have been available for a
decade now. Hmmm...
A few weeks back, I took some flak for suggesting that a working
knowledge of cognitive science - especially neuropsychology - was a
valuable instructional tool. Such knowledge allows an instructor to
better serve his/her students, and gives the students the tools
they need to self-correct aberrant behaviors. Some apparently don't
believe this, or perhaps simply don't understand why.
Some years ago I was having a specific shooting problem, one which
I had a great deal of difficulty solving. During a course I
approached my instructor, a person of some renown in the business,
with the issue. I was hoping to gain an insight as to what I could
do to solve the problem, but the response was a curt and dismissive
"dry fire." I countered that I had done quite a bit of that, and it
wasn't helping. "You need to do it more," was the
conversation-ending reply.
As it happens the problem couldn't have been helped by any amount
of dry fire, but it took me quite some time to figure that out. In
retrospect it was obvious, but only because I'd gone to a great
deal of trouble learning how the brain works (without which I'd
never have found the solution.)
A little close observation will support his contentions; for
instance, I notice that even relatively new shooters have no
problem learning how to reload their autopistols. Push the button,
the magazine drops out, insert new magazine, release slide using
whatever method one prefers. Easy, right? Physically, yes.
The issue comes when it's time to reload during a string of fire.
When the gun goes empty, the student usually try several times to
shoot again, only slowly realizing that there is a problem. They
tip the muzzle up and observe that the slide is locked back, then
stop for a second or two while their mind confronts the situation:
"Oh, I need to reload!" The physical manipulation of the reload
proceeds smoothly and quickly, compared to the awkward moments
before the decision to reload was made.
Dry reps will not make the situation better, but rather will
reinforce this behavior. Rob explains why.
(Interestingly, I've observed the same phenomenon among some
"experienced" instructors. They may have practiced slide-lock
reloads dry, but since that practice lacked context they never
developed the reflexive sequence of recognizing an empty gun and
reloading it efficiently.)
Read the article carefully, as there is some terrific information
to be gleaned.
Xavier recently posted a letterfrom - and his
response to - one of his readers. The exchange (and the comments
that follow) bring up important issues in the area of Second
Amendment activism. It isn't always black-and-white.
---
When you've finished reading Xavier, pop over to Breda's place and
readthis related articleshe posted about a month
ago. (I realize it's a bit late, and I'd meant to bring it up
earlier, but just kept forgetting.)
---
Rob Pincus is one of the more thoughtful trainers working today.
He's got a great post up on the Breach-Bang-Clear blog aboutputting techniques on
pedestals. Highly recommended
read.
---
Speaking of Rob, I discovered that he has ablog of his
own.
Good stuff.
---
Not just techniques get put on pedestals; equipment does too. There
are the 1911 people, the Glock folks, the "any caliber as long as
it begins with '4' " crowd, and so on. I suppose one could accuse
me of doing the same thing with wheelguns (retro pedestal?), but
I'm on record as saying - more than once - that the revolver isn't
the perfect tool for everyone and every purpose.
For example, a number of years ago I was engaged in an activity of
some risk. For that, I forsook my beloved revolver for a Glock and
all the high capacity magazines I could fit under a suit coat. I
believe in picking the right tool for the job; it just so happens
that, for some jobs, the revolver is at least one of the right
tools.
You're
reading... The Revolver Liberation
Alliance! The blog about revolvers,
training, self-defense, and shooting in general (along with an
occasional surprise!)