Thursday, January 26, 2012 Filed in:
Rifles, General gun
stuff
More of the 2012 SHOT Show!
It seems that I’m always looking at new riflescopes. I'm
pretty particular about image quality, and given how I tend to
treat field gear (roughly!) I also need a scope that will stand up
to abuse. In past years I've been happy with the price/performance
balance of the IOR/Valdada and Leupold scopes I’ve owned, but
their optical quality isn't as good as the more expensive brands.
I’ve had the privilege to use a Schmidt & Bender scope,
and while I love the optical (and mechanical) quality I can’t
afford the stiff tariff! I’m thus in a constant quest for
something approaching the quality of the S&B, while costing
closer to the Leupold. Believe it or not, there may in fact exist
such a scope.
At SHOT I managed to stumble upon the Premier
Optics booth. Premier is familiar
to me (and I suspect a few of you) as the maker and installer of
custom reticles in Leupold scopes. Unbeknownst to me, a couple
years back they decided to start making their own scopes. They
hired some very experienced German scope makers to do the
engineering, then started building them here in the U.S. I've got
to say that what they've come out with is stunning!
Premier was showing their two basic lines: the Tactical line, which
features 34mm tubes and the biggest, best adjustment knobs I've
ever handled; and the Light Tactical line having 30mm tubes and
smaller (but still big) knobs. I examined the scopes closely, and
did a quick-and-dirty optical evaluation. I could find no obvious
spherical or lateral color aberrations and no field curvature. The
scopes have great contrast while color, to my eyes, was a little on
the cool side (but not so much that there was a cast.)
The Premier rep assured me that all of their scopes would pass a
box test with flying colors and return to zero perfectly. Given
their long experience in military and long range competition
circles, I’m inclined to believe them!
I was particularly taken by their Light Tactical 3-15x50. I has
very solid click adjustments, and they even built in a mechanical
turns counter so that you don't get confused trying to remember how
many clicks you've put into the adjustments. Neat!

Turns counter,
underneath dot on upper turret, shows the number “1” -
meaning the turret has been rotated one full
turn.
As noted, optical quality was top notch, which is not surprising
considering the pedigree. All reticles are in the first focal
plane, making rangefinding with the mil-dots a snap at any
magnification.
I did a double-take when I looked through their new 1-8x Tactical
scope. At magnifications under 3x you see a red dot, designed for
speed of acquisition and rapid close-quarters shooting. Once the
magnification is set beyond 3x, the reticle magically changes into
a standard cross-hair mil-dot! It's a cute trick, and I can see
this scope being very popular with AR-15 shooters who want its
unique attributes.
Like with anything else, quality costs - but not as much as it
might from some of the German brands. Yes, you’ll spend north
of two grand for the cheapest of their scopes, but given the very
high construction and optical quality I think that’s a
bargain.
There were quite a few vendors of what has come to be called
‘tactical gear’, things like pouches and bags and
load-bearing equipment, at SHOT. One I'd not heard of is
Marz Tactical
Gear, a Phoenix-area company who
proudly marks their stuff as Made in USA. They showed a couple of
products that intrigued me.
First was a first aid kit pouch perfectly sized for a trauma kit.
Called the "Patrol IFAK", the pouch will hold a tourniquet,
pressure bandage, a roll of hemostatic gauze, and a few
incidentals. The cool part is that the back is covered with Velcro,
and they have a matching plate that straps onto the backside of an
automobile headrest. This keeps the kit in a known and easily
accessed location; in use, you simply grab the handle and rip the
kit from the mounting plate. You can then take it to where it is
needed. Very useful; I think I'll be buying a couple of them.

The other thing that caught my eye was what they call their "Field
Kit". It's a large piece of waterproofed Cordura nylon attached to
a couple of zippered pouches. The pouches can hold cleaning
supplies, lubricants, or even spare parts. When unrolled you have a
decent-sized work surface to catch parts and keep dirt away from
mechanisms, with the pouches on one side for easy access to the
aforementioned incidentals.

It would make a great field cleaning station or armorer's
go-anywhere emergency shop, and might be very useful for the
instructor who occasionally needs to fix a student’s gun. A
neat little idea to make life in the field (or at the range) a
little easier.
All week I kept hearing about Mossberg's new "tactical" lever
action. At least a half-dozen people told me that I just had to go
see it, so I did.

“Tactical”
has officially jumped the shark.
My initial reaction: “you’ve GOT to be kidding.”
Where to start? Mossberg managed to design out all of the lever
action's positive attributes while adding very little to its
usability. The collapsible AR-style stock wobbles and doesn't have
a comfortable grip; the rails add unnecessary weight and make
holding the forearm quite unpleasant; and the action was, to put it
charitably, rough.
The myriad protrusions of the butt stock and fore end rails simply
destroy the smooth, snag-free handling that is one of the chief
virtues of the lever action. It's a rifle that has been styled as
opposed to designed, perhaps by someone who might not have had the
opportunity to become familiar with the lever action and how it is
best employed.
Available in .22LR or .30-30, I'm sure it will sell - just like the
Taurus Judge sells. I'll stick to my traditional models, thank you,
as they've proven themselves capable of a wide range of tasks,
without poseur bolt-ons, for quite some time now.
(This is a perfect example of my belief that the rifle,
particularly the lever action, is a general purpose tool. The more
crap you hang on it, the more specialized and therefore less useful
it becomes. My AR-15s are pretty much stock, and I've found that
they're the most versatile in that configuration. As my eyes
continue to deteriorate I may have to fit them with optics, but
even then I'll make sure that the choice will leave them usable for
the variety of tasks I expect to encounter. The same can be said of
my lever actions. Someone at Mossberg, in my opinion, just
doesn’t Get It.)
More to come tomorrow - stay tuned!
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: shot.show, sights, optics, tacticool,
lever.actions, wtf ?
Wednesday, June 30, 2010 Filed in:
Rifles, Accessories
From The Firearm Blog comes news about a new
iPhone/iPod Touch app called Mil-Dot Rangefinder which claims to "take the
math out of ranging targets.” Intriguing idea.
Sadly I have no mil-dot scopes in my inventory; several scopes with
rangefinding reticles, but no mil-dots. This app is therefore
useless for me, but looks pretty neat and will probably be of great
value to those who do have appropriate optics.
I must admit that I feel my inner Luddite surfacing when
considering things such as these. A huge benefit of the mil-dot is
to allow rangefinding in the scope, without having to use
externally powered systems or devices. Will the shooter become as
familiar with his equipment as his technologically backward
counterpart? What happens if he leaves his iPhone at home, or if
the battery dies?
Not that I'm throwing stones, as my glass house (well, glass-faced
iPhone anyhow) contains the superb Ballistic
FTE. I love that app, though it
has come at the expense of memorizing my rifle's drop table at
various distances. In the old days, which is now a scant five years
ago, I'd tape the drop table to the stock for quick reference.
Ballistic FTE has made me lazy, and I don't even have a table made
for a couple of my rifles - let alone having one taped to their
stocks. What happens if I leave my iPhone at home, or if the
battery goes dead?
Miss, I suppose. My inner Luddite is laughing at me.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: apps, optics
GETTING
THE MESSAGE: I've been harping on
the failures of "Rule #1" for some time now, and it
seems that the attitude is catching on. Slowly, but at least
progress is being made.
IT
ISN'T JUST ME: I've recently expounded on
the issue of
dogmatic teaching in the self defense world,
and I'm not alone in my criticism. Check out this post from Roger Phillips
over at
warriortalk.com, then read the entire discussion. (I've never met Roger,
don't know him from Adam, but he makes sense. Can't say that about
everyone.)
POCKET
COMPANION: no, not a J-frame!
From Dustin's Gun Blog I learned of a new
iPhone/iPod Touch app called Legal Heat. It's an interactive
version of their printed guide to concealed carry and gun laws in
all 50 states, written by attorneys and instructors. It' a great
idea, and something that's needed. Unfortunately, despite the
viability of the concept I cannot in good conscience recommend this
particular app.
There is a big issue with Legal Heat's usability. The pages are
just images of the book, which means they're pictures and not text.
This sounds inconsequential, but it's not. When you bring up the
laws on a state, because it's showing the whole page the text is
tiny; unreadably small. To read it, you need to magnify the image
by pinching. (The usual double-tap doesn't work, because it doesn't
work on full-frame images!) Once you magnify the image to read the
text, you have to continually scroll back and forth because images
don't wrap text. Finally, the app doesn't support screen rotation;
it only displays in portrait orientation, which exacerbates the
scrolling issue.
Frankly, iPhone users are accustomed to a higher level of
application quality than Legal Heat delivers. If they would simply
make their pages actual text and enable screen rotation I'd be
comfortable recommending it. As it stands, even at $1.99 it's not
worth the hassle.
DEAL
ALERT: My background in commercial
photography has left me more than a little anal retentive with
regards to optics, particularly when it comes to binoculars. I'm a
fan of porro-prism designs, as they a) have better
three-dimensional perspective, b) are brighter, and c) cost less
than roof-prism types for any given level of optical quality
(resolution/contrast.)
Minox makes some of the best porro-prism binocs. The optical
performance is exceptional, and the build quality matches the
glass. They make an 8x and a 10x version, and at a street price of
roughly $550 they are something of a bargain; you'll need to spend
roughly twice as much to get a roof prism of comparable
performance, and you still won't get the perspective advantage that
the porro-prism design gives you.
Despite their advantages, porro-prism designs are distinctly
unfashionable these days and don't sell well regardless of brand.
Roof prisms are what people buy, and Minox has bowed to the market:
they've discontinued the 10x model. SWFA
is closing them out at $299.95, which has to be
classed as a screaming good deal. You won't find anything even
approaching their optical performance for that kind of money. (Yes,
I grabbed a pair - for that price, I wasn't about to pass them
up!)
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: safety, dogma, apps, optics