Wednesday, November 09, 2011 Filed in:
Humor, Rifles
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 Filed in:
Technology, Techniques &
Training
Yesterday Apple announced a new iPhone, and with it an advanced
software to add voice control to that phone. (“Siri”?
Who names these things?)
Almost immediately the blogs and tech sites were abuzz with
inevitable comparisons to the competition, complete with tables
breaking down the products feature by feature.
I found it amusing that they all had one line that said 'voice
control', with a simple "YES" or checkmark on each product. Some of
the more adventurous would take pains to point out that the
competition had 'voice control' for some time, and Apple was just
catching up. What they failed to take into account was the relative
sophistication and integration of the feature on all the products;
love 'em or hate 'em, Apple's new voice assistant goes well beyond
the simple "call Bill at work" kinds of control that phones have
had for years. The software anticipates and evaluates natural
language requests in a way that hasn't yet been done on a consumer
device, and interacts with the phone's functions in a wider way
than we're accustomed to.
(My best friend was the founder of a software company which did
pioneering work in the field of computer control via voice
recognition. Even he's impressed with how far Apple was able to
push this technology, and he's about as jaded an expert in that
field as you could ever find. He’s also one of the best
shooting instructors I know, which gives me the perfect segue into
this article’s actual topic!)
My point is not to sell phones - personally, I don't derive my
self-worth from what I buy or what you don't buy - but rather to
point out the folly of making bullet point comparisons. If you just
looked at the bullet point of voice control and saw the checkmark,
you wouldn't come away understanding the vastly different ways in
which that feature has been implemented.
This goes well beyond phones, as lots of people do the same thing
when they take defensive shooting classes. I call them "checklist
students" - people who make decisions as to what school or class
they'll attend by looking over a list of topics being covered. I've
actually talked to people who have chosen one class over another
because of the number of topics covered, without understanding the
depth of the instruction or the unique approach of the
instructor.
I've also seen students request refunds from instructors when the
simple number of things they learned wasn't the same as in other
classes they've attended, even though the student made no effort to
understand or become competent in those things that were taught.
The checklist is in control, not their desire to learn nor their
appreciation of their own skill development.
There are instructors out there who will throw a million different
topics into a class and give the students perhaps a couple of
minutes with each, then dash on to the next item on the agenda.
There are other instructors who cover a fraction of those topics
but cover them thoroughly, giving students time and opportunity to
really start to develop some proficiency. Unfortunately, the former
tend to be the more successful - checklists, it would seem, sell
classes as well as phones, cameras, cars, and just about everything
else.
If you buy a phone via a checklist, the worst that happens is that
you don't have the functionality of another phone. You can always
get another. When it comes to your skill development, particularly
the ability to successfully defend your own life, the stakes are a
little higher. Make your training decisions based not on an
ambitious list of topics, but on an understanding of what, how and
why your instructor does what he/she does.
Leave the checklists to those who would rather brag than
learn.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: gun.skool, georges.rahbani
Wednesday, April 13, 2011 Filed in:
My Life, Techniques &
Training
Over at the Personal Defense Network, they've put up a profile of yours
truly. Based on an interview I
did recently, it covers my views on teaching and the state of the
training business. Hope you enjoy it!
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: classes, combat.focus, gun.skool,
georges.rahbani, personal.defense.network,
rob.pincus
I spent this weekend assisting at a defensive rifle class with
Georges Rahbani, and sometime during the weekend thought of a great
article for today.
Then I forgot what it was.
My usual habit is to carry, in the left pocket of my shirt, a small
pad and a mechanical pencil. When I have an idea I jot it down,
thus preserving it for a time when I can make use of it. That's
assuming, of course, that I remember to look at the thing!
The weather was pretty warm this weekend (about 90 degrees) and we
were in the sun for most of the two days. I'd shed my normal
pocketed button-front shirt for a more comfortable short sleeved
Henley. My pad and pencil, of course, was in the regular shirt and
when the aforementioned great idea struck, I was without a means to
record it. Thus this morning's rambling version of "my dog ate my
homework!"
Luckily Chris over at The Anarchangel posted something worthy of
commentary. Go read it, then come back for a little
discussion.
I tuned in for the first episode of Top Shot, recognized it as yet
another overblown social manipulation festival common to reality
television, and promptly turned it off. My spare time is quite
limited and I have to make hard decisions about what I do with it.
Even with guns and shooting Top Shot didn't make my cut, so I
didn't know what transpired until Chris filled me in.
Those who live in landlocked states probably have no concept of
just what the United States Coast Guard does. Here in Oregon, where
Coast Guard helicopters and rescue crews are a common sight, we
have a deep appreciation for the sacrifices those men and women
make. Despite being ridiculed (or even worse, ignored) they go out
and do their job to the best of their ability every day of the
week.
Those in the other services are only in danger when they've been
activated and deployed, and their tours of deployment are limited
in duration (a good thing, do not misunderstand.) The USCG is
always on deployment, whether doing rescue work, interdicting
smugglers, or protecting our Navy's operations in foreign ports.
(That's right - when the U.S. Navy needs help, they call the Coast
Guard!) When I was growing up it was widely said that you were more
likely to be killed in the Coast Guard in peacetime than in the
infantry during wartime. While that may not be literally true, it
serves to illustrate the tough job USCG does.
Much of that is because the nature of their missions requires them
to always be in harm's way. One of their primary duties is to
protect lives in America's waters, and here in Oregon they do so
constantly. The USCG's rescue swimmers and helicopter pilots are
the best that can be found; until you've witnessed a Dolphin SAR
helicopter hovering nearly motionless just feet away from a cliff
face, in high winds and torrential rain, you have little
appreciation for the skill of those crews. I don't know where one
goes to recruit such people, but they must have ice water injected
into their veins upon enlistment. They are amazing to watch, and
when they appear on scene there is a very strong feeling of relief
- even if you're not the subject of their attention.
So, to Caleb and all the other past and present members of the
United States Coast Guard, and especially to those stationed here
in Oregon, thank you. We appreciate your service, your sacrifice,
and above all your professionalism.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: bloggers, oregon, georges.rahbani
Monday, February 01, 2010 Filed in:
Techniques &
Training, Reloading, Revolvers
MY
WEEKEND: It's not often I get to be a
student these days, but it's important for any instructor to do so
now and again. Last week I got an invitation from
Jeff
Varner, one of ICE Training's
certified Combat Focus
instructors, to
sit in on his class in Vancouver. Unfortunately I had to cut out a
bit early due to a prior commitment, but I enjoyed the class
nonetheless. Thanks, Jeff, for the invite!
DRAW
FAST, HOLSTER SLOW: Tam alerts us to a ND that
happened at a Todd Green class. In his commendable reporting of the incident, Todd
says "Never be in a rush to
holster your pistol. We all know it, we say it, we teach it. Not
all of us do it." So true.
As instructors it's easy for us to forget that reinforcement, and
sometimes enforcement, are necessary parts of our job. Especially
when we're dealing with "advanced" students, we tend to go easy on
the reinforcement of fundamentals for fear that we'll be resented
for belittling their ability or experience. We have to resist that
tendency, and we need to do so consistently. When warranted,
enforcement (up to and including ejection from class) has to
happen.
The only instructor I've ever seen who is absolutely consistent in
this regard is Georges Rahbani (TBRIYNHO.)
Even in his advanced rifle classes, which are invitation only and
have stringent prerequisites, you will hear "safety on" and "finger
in register" (index, if you prefer) commands at the end of a string
of fire. He never wastes an opportunity for reinforcement at any
level of training or ability.
When Georges encounters failures to heed commands or instruction,
he has a way of bringing the point home to the student: he/she has
to publicly deposit a dollar bill into a pot. (The students have a
friendly shoot-off at the end of class to win the pot.) This has a
non-confrontational, yet still very chastening, effect on both the
offending person and the rest of the students; I've seen it work on
countless occasions. I don't know where the idea comes from, but
I'm giving Georges the credit.
THE PROBLEM WITH ELECTRONIC SCALES: I recently sat down to work
up a new .308 load. I turned on my RCBS electronic scale, waited a
couple of minutes, and starting weighing charges. Much to my
surprise, the weight of the charges thrown by my powder measure
increased each time! I'd forgotten that electronic scales need
protracted warmup periods before accuracy and repeatability can be
expected. After a half-hour of warmup, it settled down and gave
correct readings. Word to the wise: keep your mechanical scales
around to double check the electronic ones, or buy a set of check
weights.
HERE
COMES DA JUDGE: From The Unforgiving Minute comes this gem:
"The inexplicable
success of the Taurus Judge still depresses the hell out of me.
Taurus keeps cranking out new versions, each more grotesque,
hideous and nonsensical than the last, and people KEEP BUYING THE
GODDAMN THINGS. Just another sign that our culture is doomed, I
suppose."
(The opinions of the contributor do not necessarily reflect the
views of the Management of this blog. Then again, they just
might.)
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: combat.focus, gun.skool,
safety,
bloggers, georges.rahbani
Monday, November 30, 2009 Filed in:
Self defense, Techniques &
Training
In
a previous episode, I talked about doctrine,
dogma, and cliché. One particular subject is very often the source
of instructional dogmatism, and sometimes spills over into cliché:
the shooting stance.
Since we're talking about self defense, let's start with the
conclusion: as I study surveillance films of actual shootings, and
as I play with the concepts of force-on-force training, I'm struck
by the fact that violent encounters rarely involve an identifiable
stance. The players, especially the defender, are shooting from
whatever position in which they happen to find themselves.
If that's the end result, do we even need to worry about stances?
Why do we bother spending the time working on the isoceles,
Chapman, or Weaver stances when we're probably not going to be
using them when reality comes barging into our lives?
Over Thanksgiving I was discussing this with Georges Rahbani
("The Best Rifle Instructor You've Never Heard
Of".) For many years his 'Fighting
Rifle' triad has started with basic stances ('platforms', in
rifle-speak) and ended up with shooters using whatever stance they
happened upon in the course of the encounter. He explained that a
basic stance allows the student to do two very important things:
first, to eliminate a variable that keeps them from focusing on the
necessary stuff like trigger control and sight picture. Second, it
helps to develop the level of confidence necessary to be able to
control the shot no matter what. Once those have been achieved, the
notion of a stance can be jettisoned on the way to a better
understanding of a violent encounter.
Some may immediately think of the term 'training wheels', but I
prefer to call the stance a 'scaffold': a temporary device that
allows us to build something. In the case of a defensive shooter,
we're building a skill set. Without the support of the scaffold -
the solid, repeatable stance - it's difficult, if not impossible,
to build those skills. With it, the student can focus on the truly
important things, secure in the knowledge that they are operating
from a stable base.
The problem comes when the instructor doesn't understand the true
nature of the shooting stance. In those cases, the stance becomes
an end unto itself: it drives the instruction, rather than serving
as an instructional tool.
A few years back I had an encounter with an instructor who didn't
understand this. He went to great lengths explaining why his
preferred Weaver stance was the "only stance anyone should ever
need." When queried about physical makeup, gun/hand fit, and other
variables that affect the success or failure of any given stance
with any given student, all he could do was sputter that the Weaver
was "proven" to be superior. His dogma was well on the road to
cliché.
I've met many shooters who were victims of such shortsighted
teachers. More than once have I observed graduates of multiple
shooting classes displaying the necessity of getting into just the
"perfect" stance in order to shoot. Forced out of that comfort
zone, they literally cannot hit the target. Their teachers were so
focused on stance that they forgot about the rest of the act of
shooting. The stance had become a destination, rather than the
journey which it should be.
Roger
Phillips, one of the new breed of
fight-focused instructors, puts it very well: "Situations dictate
strategies, strategies dictate tactics, and tactics dictate
techniques……techniques
should not dictate anything."
Yes, you need to
learn a stance that is comfortable and repeatable for you.
Understand, though, that when shooting for your life your favorite
stance is more than likely going to be abandoned for whatever
position the situation allows. Wouldn't it be a good idea to train
for that eventuality?
Use a preferred stance to build your trigger control and sighting
skills; once that's done, learn to shoot from a 'non-stance'. Get
used to being able to deliver combat accurate hits from any angle,
any position, while still or moving. If you've used the basic
stance properly, you'll find that you no longer need it (at least,
for this kind of shooting.)
Ironic, isn't it?
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: gun.skool, georges.rahbani, dogma
Wednesday, October 28, 2009 Filed in:
General gun
stuff, Humor
Last weekend I was assisting at a Defensive Shotgun course taught
by Georges Rahbani ("The Best Rifle
Instructor You've Never Heard Of"). A couple of the
participants were discussing a problem with a ParaOrdnance pistol
when I walked up. "Well, it's not like you should be surprised", I
said, "when the brand's name tells you everything you need to
know."
They stared at me blankly.
"Para- is a prefix meaning 'similar to' or 'resembling' ", I
continued. "So, Para-Ordnance means that it's only 'sort of a gun'
."
I'm here to tell you that some people are seriously humor
impaired.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: georges.rahbani
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 Filed in:
General gun
stuff, Techniques &
Training
In college I minored in music performance. Being just out of high
school (read: thoroughly stupid) I thought I was a hot musician,
harboring dreams of becoming a professional trumpet player. Like so
many other aspiring performers I really had no idea what the world
of a professional musician actually entailed, but I was absolutely
sure I had what it took.
One of my professors, an accomplished professional trombonist, made
it his job to bring us post-adolescents into the real world.
Shortly into my freshman term, he was talking with a few of the
members of the trumpet section after class. The talk turned to the
requirements of a "pro", and all of us were convinced we had the
Right Stuff. Our prof had heard this kind of chatter before, and
bet our first chair player that he didn't yet possess the bare
minimum skills necessary for the job.
Trumpet players are usually narcissistic personalities, the kind
who don't back down from a fight, and the kid said "you're
on!"
The prof sighed and said simply "get out your horn. I want you to
blow a perfect half-note G above the staff" (trumpet players in the
audience will understand.) The kid smirked, dropped his case to the
floor and pulled out his horn. "Wait a minute", said our teacher.
"I said a perfect G. No warmup. Just one perfect note; in tune from
start to end, solid attack, no slop or waviness, crisp decay. You
have one and only one shot. Go."
I shouldn't have to tell you the kid failed - miserably. Then
again, none of the rest of us would have done any better. We were
clueless: none of us yet knew enough to understand how much we
didn't yet know.
Fast forward a few decades, and the shooting range serves up the
same lesson. Georges Rahbani, "The Best Rifle
Instructor You've Never Heard Of" , has a way of impressing on
his students how they should assess their own abilities:
"You
are only as good as you are, on demand."
What you can do right now, without warm up or sighting shots,
without excuses or alibis, is the true measure of how good you
are.
This is different from how most people gauge their ability. Most
folks would take their rifle to the range on a nice sunny day,
settle in comfortably at the bench, fire a bunch of rounds, then
shoot a 1" group. They're so proud of that group they take the
target home and hang it in their garage or office. "I'm hot
stuff!", they'll think - after all, they have the target to prove
it!
The next day at the range it's raining, they've had a fight with
their spouse, can't get comfortable on the cold bench, and now
their best group doesn't even break 3". "That's not me", they'll
say to themselves, "I shoot one-inch groups!" The alibis flow like
PBR at a fraternity house, and serve to obscure the fact that the
3" group wasn't the anomaly - the 1" group was. The larger one is
the true indicator of their skill.
It's not what someone can do when everything is going their way
that shows ability; it's what they can do under suboptimal
conditions that does. If a person can't shoot until getting into
just the right stance, with perfect foot placement and textbook
body positioning, then that person still has a lot of work to do to
master the fundamentals. (I've seen people who can shoot pretty
well on a concrete pad, but go all to pieces on a gravel range.
They can't get into their comfort zone.)
This is one thing if we're talking about plinking, but becomes
another thing entirely when the subject turns to self defense. The
other guy isn't going to wait for us to get into the perfect stance
we learned from our guru; we need to be able to deliver rapid,
multiple, properly placed shots from whatever position the
situation dictates, under whatever conditions it hands us. That
requires the courage to admit to ourselves that maybe - just maybe
- we aren't quite as good as we think.
Right here, right now, no warmups, no excuses - how good are
you?
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: georges.rahbani
Monday, October 13, 2008 Filed in:
Rifles, General gun
stuff
This past weekend marked our last rifle class for the year. As
often happens, we came away with our unusual (In this day and age)
opinions about rifles and gear validated and vindicated.
Georges Rahbani, our chief instructor (and my vote for the best
"urban rifle" teacher you've never heard of) has a saying: "thou
shalt not hang sh*t on thy rifle!" His point is that adding geegaws
to a basically sound firearm rarely improves shooter performance,
and often results in lessened mechanical performance. The
ever-popular "tactical latch" for the AR-15 is such an accessory,
and the installation of one may pose an unforeseen risk.
For those who've never seen a "tac latch", it's a large appendage
that replaces the standard latching lever found on the left side of
the AR's charging handle. (I'm still not really sure of it's
purpose, but all the "high speed, low drag" folks appear to have
them on their rifles. The latch's large "wing" would, it seems to
me, in fact increase drag and decrease speed - but hey, what do I
know?)
In all fairness, it should be mentioned that there is one good use
for the tac latch: to be able to operate the charging handle with a
low-mounted scope, in the same way that a hammer extension performs
on a lever-action rifle. Outside of that, however, they serve no
useful purpose that I can discern.
If you're absolutely convinced that you really need this accessory,
take a piece of friendly advice: DON'T install it on the stock
aluminum charging handle! The increased leverage from the oversized
latch causes fractures to develop around the charging handle's
pivot pin; the "t" part of the handle can then snap off at
inopportune times. Yes, I've seen it happen.
There is an all-steel charging charging handle available from
Brownell's (and no doubt other fine retailers), and it is a far
better choice for the installation of the tac latches. Do yourself
a favor and spend the few extra dollars; it's worth it to avoid the
problem.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: georges.rahbani