The
Truth Is Out There: I've mentioned Kathy
Jackson's CorneredCat site as the best resource on
the web for those women who want to get involved in the firearms
world. This week on the ProArms Podcast, Gail Pepin interviews
Kathy about one of her all-time classic articles:
"How to Make Your Wife Hate Guns."
The interview is
even better than the article, and is a must-listen for any man out
there who wishes for his wife/significant to start shooting.
Guys, I'm not kidding - you need to listen to this podcast. Kathy's
interview starts about 20 minutes in, preceded by Dr. Paula Bratich
talking about concealed carry in Illinois.
Better
Late Than Never: Prior to the SHOT show, The
FIrearms Blog reported that Ruger was going to show a .357 version
of the LCR. It was only slightly premature, as Ruger showed
it off at last week's NRA Convention. Not for me, thanks, but
I'm sure that there are those who will love it.
The
Bad Guys Have An Advantage: An interesting article over
at PoliceOne.com asks "Why do bad guys seem to do so well in
gunfights?" Worthwhile reading.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: bloggers, women, ruger, .357, attacks
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 Filed in:
Ammunition, General gun
stuff, Self defense
This morning I got a very nice email from a concerned gentleman in
a southern state. His NRA instructor gave him numerous pieces of
incorrect information about his new GP100, one of which I've heard
many times before: "Don't carry Magnums, because the muzzle flash
will blind you in a self-defense shooting!"
With all due respect, bull twaddle.
The .357 Magnum is notorious for muzzle flash, based largely on
some well-known pictures from the 1980s. These days, even the
Magnum uses flash-suppressed powders, and muzzle flash with the
.357 has been dramatically reduced.
Still, the misconception remains that any muzzle flash will blind
you and make it impossible to deliver followup shots. In my
experience, that isn't the case.
I once did an experiment, in front of witnesses, on our club's
indoor range - using not some wimpy .357 or even .44, but a Dan
Wesson .445 SuperMag with a 3" barrel. I personally loaded the
rounds to "full house" status, which means maximum velocity,
recoil, and flash.
We turned off the range lights except for one in the adjacent
classroom, which gave just enough illumination for me to make out
the IDPA target about 20 feet downrange.
KA-BOOOOOOOOM! If you've never experienced a SuperMag on an indoor
range, it's a treat. If, that is, you like lots of noise,
concussion, and muzzle flash. We're talking muzzle flash that
witnesses confirmed extended 5 feet from the barrel. I wish we'd
taken pictures.
Guess what? I could still see my target; I wasn't blinded at all.
So I fired another shot. Then another. Still no flash induced
blindness. I could still see my target, but most importantly I
could still hit it. Understand: I'm not saying that it had zero
effect on my vision. I could see the afterimage of the fireball,
but it wasn't at all debilitating even in near darkness.
Is this conclusive proof? Of course not, it's just one person's
experience - but it's a heck of a lot more experience with the
subject matter than most gunstore commandoes appear to have. No
matter how impressive the fireball, it just doesn't seem to possess
sufficient intensity to markedly reduce one's vision.
If a non-flash-suppressed SuperMag won't do it, I hardly think a
.357 with modern suppressed propellants could. Of course I'm
willing to be proven wrong, but at this moment I consider it ill
advised to pick a round (caliber or brand) based solely on muzzle
flash characteristics.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: .357
Monday, July 27, 2009 Filed in:
General gun
stuff, Competition, Humor
A number of years back my wife and I served as coordinators for the
defensive pistol matches at our gun club. Our matches were somewhat
similar to IDPA, but without the endless rules to make everything
"fair." We enjoyed a cadre of participants that were very involved,
and loved to build sets for stages.
(Some of them got a little carried away; one particular gentleman
once designed a stage that featured cardboard cows. Yes, cows,
complete with udders. He's a very creative sort.)
We held our matches on our club's metallic silhouette range, so we
had only a large open field in which to set up stages. We'd usually
set up four "open" stages (you could see the entire thing), but
also liked to set up one secret stage - the participants couldn't
see anything until they were actually in it. The way we usually
accomplished this was to hang large tarps on portable stakes to
block the view, but there were other approaches.
One particular match several guys got together and constructed a
dark tunnel. The premise was that you were walking down an alley at
night, and targets would swing out or come charging toward you. It
was a technical marvel, and all contained in a narrow structure
made of wood and black plastic ("visqueen.") As I recall, it was
about 8 feet wide, 8 feet tall, and perhaps 30 feet long.
Since the premise was darkness, the entire thing was sheathed in
that black plastic - including the roof. It took quite some time to
build, so the guys had been on the range the day before to do the
construction. When we arrived the next morning to start the match,
we found that it had rained overnight. That wasn't a problem,
because the black plastic roof had kept everything dry. What we
didn't think about were the large puddles of water on that
plastic.
Since I was the match director, I got to shoot first. I was using a
Ruger SP101 with the 2-1/8" barrel and fire-breathing 125grain JHP
magnums. The range officer and I entered the structure, closed the
door, and the buzzer went off.
I saw the first target and put two rounds into it, and immediately
heard peals of laughter behind me. Outside of the enclosure, the
other shooters were becoming hysterical.
I finished the stage (as I recall, there were three more targets)
and exited the enclosure to find the laughter had diminished only
slightly. People in the crowd told me that my first shot had
created such a large amount of pressure in the enclosure that the
sides were pushed out and the pooled water on the roof had been
thrown twenty feet into the air. The effect, they said, looked like
a Looney Toons cartoon of a stick of dynamite exploding in a
barrel.
In the heat of the moment I didn't really notice the concussion,
but the range officer mentioned that he didn't want to follow me so
closely any more!
-=[ Grant ]=-
Tags: .357
Wednesday, October 10, 2007 Filed in:
General gun
stuff
Back in the "olden days"
(no, kids, that does not mean the 1970s) it was common to carry a
revolver and a rifle that used the same ammunition. There is still
a lot to recommend the practice! If you have a wheelgun in .357,
.44, .32-20, .41 Magnum, or .45 Colt, Marlin makes a lever action rifle
to take your
ammunition.
Let's consider the .357: in a revolver the .357 is a formidable
cartridge, but In a rifle it gets a big boost in performance with
surprisingly low recoil. Many people use the .357 carbine as a deer
gun at moderate ranges, and there are even some who swear that they
can be used for elk. I'll dispute that latter contention, but as a
short-range deer gun it is superb.
Of course the .357 rifle will also handle .38 Special ammunition.
Using light loads, it can be used for jobs like plinking cans and
hunting squirrels. I ran across a fellow a few years ago who used
his for hunting sage
rats!
It should go without saying that recoil from these loads is nearly
non-existent.
As a home defense gun it is easily handled by all qualified members
of a family, no matter how sensitive they are to recoil. I don't
have to tell you of the .357's reputation for "stopping
power"!
Light, fast handling, and very low recoil, it may be the very best
"all around" rifle you could own. If you don't have a lever action
to complement your wheelguns, you're missing out on a whole lot of
fun - and utility as well.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: lever.actions, .357