In 1935, a fellow by the name ofRoy
Strykerwent to work for the federal
government. Specifically, he took over the job of managing the
Historical Section of Roosevelt's Resettlement Administration.
Almost immediately the organization morphed into theFarm Security Administration, and his section became the
Information Division.
Without putting too fine a point on it, Stryker's job was
propaganda - to give the Administration what they needed to justify
spending money that they didn't have. To further this aim, he came
up with an idea: he'd send out a bunch of photographers to make
pictures that would both tug at America’s heartstrings and
provide support for Roosevelt's policies. He gathered a bunch of
talented people from varied backgrounds - writers, painters, and
budding photographers - and sent them over the country to make
pictures.
While we can certainly debate the means of the program, the ends
were spectacular. Stryker's team shot over 164,000 pictures,
producing hundreds of iconic images and launching the careers of
many talented photographers. So good was the group that they would
later be transferred to the Office of War Information to document
the country’s entry into World War II, though their tenure
would last only a year.
Of those hundreds of thousands of images they shot, only 644 were
in color. Color film was quite expensive, even for the government's
pockets, but more importantly couldn't be reproduced in the
newspapers of the day. Its use was therefore quite limited, and the
photos somewhat rare.
Here are 70 of those 644, including some from a
couple of my favorite FSA photographers: Jack Delano and Alfred
Palmer.
(What happened to Stryker? In 1943 he went to work for Standard
Oil, who foresaw the need to polish their own public image. Several
of the FSA photographers, now unemployed after the OWI cut them
loose, went to work to make Standard look good. They succeeded, and
the Standard Oil photographs of that period still stand as supreme
examples of industrial photography. It’s too bad that Stryker
died in 1975 - I’m sure BP could use his services right about
now.)
In theFriday
Surprise for the 6th, there were two bonus
questions. A couple of people came close, but didn't get all the
details. The Leopolds referred to in the title were Leopold Mannes
and Leopold Godowsky, friends who happened to be professional
musicians and amateur photo chemists. Their work in color film led
directly to the invention of Kodachrome. The connection with
Rhapsody in Blue? The song's composer, George Gershwin, had a
sister named Frances - who was married to Godowsky.
---
It seems odd to me, but I get lots of inquiries about where to buy
targets. My favorite source isLaw Enforcement
Targets, which carries a huge line
of paper and cardboard products. For defensive and "tactical"
training, their stuff is the best. My other source, which carries
more traditional targets (NRA, IPSC, and IDPA) isAlco Target
Company. I've done business with
both for years, and have never had a reason to complain.
---
I've mentioned this before, but do check out the forums over at
thePersonal Defense Network. There are some great
discussions there, and the only thing missing is YOU!
The roll was shot by photojournalist Steve McCurry, and the images
on it range from New York to India to Parsons, Kansas - where the
last Kodachrome processing line is located. It, too, will be going
the way of the dinosaur this December, when the equipment will be
shut down for good.
Bonus points: can you
decipher the meaning of my title? Extra bonus points if you can do
so without a search engine; super extra bonus points if you can
tell me how 'Rhapsody in Blue' is related to
Kodachrome.
In 1791, the French Assembly decided that the purpose of capital
punishment was to end a miscreant's life, not to cause him
unbearable pain. A committee was formed for the purpose of devising
a pain-free method of execution that was suitable for both upper
and lower class undesirables. How egalitarian of them!
One of the committee members was a Dr. Joseph-Ignace Guillotin.
While he was opposed to the death penalty, he believed that making
it more humane would lead to its abolition. (The logic behind this
escapes me, but apparently doctors often have this failing: one Dr.
Richard J. Gatling, inventor of the gun that bears his name,
believed that the creation of a terrible weapon would inspire
people to no longer entertain the idea of war. Didn't work for him,
either.)
The French committee eventually came up with a beheading machine,
and because of the good doctor's promotion of the new "humane"
method his name was associated forever with the contraption.
But just how humane is the guillotine?This article at Damn Interestingraises all kinds
of questions about just what happens at the instant one's head is
separated from its support mechanisms. Personally, I hope to never
find out!
Ronald Reagan was halfway through his first term as President when
I took my first trip east of the Rockies. It was also my first trip
via airliner, and though I'd flown quite a bit in small aircraft
the view from 30,000+ feet was new to me. I was heading to
Rochester, NY. Traveling from Portland to Rochester on Delta
Airlines entailed a stop in Detroit, which also meant a trip over
Lake Michigan.
If you've followed the story so far you'll deduce that I'd never
seen any of the Great Lakes. Oh, I knew all about them; I'd studied
geography in school. I knew that they were actually inland seas,
that they had their own weather, that they were the largest group
of freshwater bodies on earth. What I didn't know, or more
correctly didn't fathom, was just how big they were.
As the plane crossed Lake Michigan I was struck by the fact that
all I could see was water. I finally grasped the reality of the
Great Lakes, and the stories I'd read about shipwrecks and lost
souls suddenly became understandable. In that vast expanse of
water, some of it nearly a thousand feet thick, it would be very
easy to lose a vessel in one of the lake's infamous storms.
In 1898, that's what happened to the steamship L.R. Doty. She was
carrying a load of corn destined for Ontario when a powerful storm
armed with thirty-foot waves sent her to the lake floor. The 320
feet of cold, salt-free water that sat on top of her preserved her
remains in almost perfect condition.
Those remains were just recently found, 112 years after her final
trip.Great storyfrom the Milwaukee Journal
Sentinel; be sure to check out thephoto galleryof the wreck.
When I was a kid I dreamed of converting the fuel oil tank in our
garage into a submarine. It was a 350 gallon flattened oval tank,
no doubt familiar to millions of baby boomers whose furnaces ran on
liquid fossil fuels, and I just waited for the day that I could get
my hands on it.
I had big plans for my submarine: first I'd explore the depths of
the pond on our 'back forty', then I'd take it down to the river
and search the bottom for...I'm not sure what, but I just knew I'd
find something. Little things like how I'd get air to breathe or
how I'd see where I was going were mere trivialities. (After all,
didn'tSeaviewhave windows? I'd have them
too!)
Naturally nothing ever came of my plans, but that didn't stop me
from being fascinated with small submarines. The Japanese mini-subs
of World War II were particularly interesting, and I read
everything I could about them. It was known that five had attacked
Pearl Harbor, but only four had ever been recovered. The fate of
the fifth remained a mystery.
I hope everyone enjoys their three-day weekend, but do take a least
a moment to reflect on why this holiday exists. Nothing maudlin, no
overblown sentimentality, just a request that you think about it
for at least a few moments as you fire up the grill.
I found this on Digg a few days ago, and thought it was intriguing.
There is much about the Mayan civilization's technology that we
still don't know, and this is opens up another set of
questions.
Makes the dream of time travel all the more tantalizing.
I usually eat my breakfast in front of the computer. I check my
personal email, look in at Twitter and Facebook, read George Ure's
blog, look at all the blog feeds to which I subscribe, and maybe
even check what's for sale on Craigslist.
One of the Facebook updates this morning was fromRob
Pincus, who is heading for
Rochester (NY). That brought back memories, as in my former life I
traveled to Rochester on an occasional basis, one time staying for
the better part of two weeks. Astute readers will deduce that these
trips had something to do with the Eastman Kodak Company (EKC, as
it was known - Kodak was extremely fond of acronyms and
abbreviations), and that deduction would be correct.
In the early- to mid-Eighties, which is when I visited, Kodak owned
most of Rochester - and what they didn't, Xerox did. Kodak's
facilities were huge even by Detroit standards, all based on sales
of film and associated equipment and supplies. As digital
photography eroded film's dominance, Kodak (which had been
willfully dismissive of the digital threat throughout the period
under discussion) saw their business decline precipitously.
Barely into the new century, Kodak was closing buildings at a rapid
pace. They demolished a few, auctioned off some others, and sold
what they felt they didn't need but which would still generate
cash. One of the latter was a complex known as the Marketing
Education Center, or - in EKC-speak - MEC.
MEC is where they held seminars, training sessions, and business
meetings. Every time I went to Kodak, MEC is where I ended up. It
was a gorgeous campus, looking more like a community college than a
corporate office.
MEC sat next to the Genesee River, and featured a dining hall with
floor-to-ceiling windows that looked out over the river and a
placid meadow. The view from the tiered seating was so perfectly
New England, regardless of the season, that visitors joked the
windows were actually Duratrans - Kodak's trade name for large,
backlit transparencies. The food was't bad, either!
This little trip down memory lane got me to wondering: whatever
happened to MEC? As it turns out, pretty much nothing. Kodak
cleared out and sold it for about $3.5 million to an investment
concern in 2004, and it appears to be sitting vacant today.The campus, with 120 acres
and four buildings, is currently for saleat an asking
price of only $9.9 million.
P.S.: Speaking of
acronyms...at one point Kodak decided to do some corporate
reshuffling, and the technicians who serviced their large
photofinishing and photocopying equipment were inexplicably
transferred to the control of the newly renamed Consumer Equipment
Service. At roughly the same time, those technicians were given the
title of “Field Engineers.” The in-joke was that since
they were now FEs, working for CES, that their corporate acronym
was to be FECES. Upper management was not at all
amused.
While you may not be familiar with her work, Megan Prelinger has
been busy chronicling America’s space initiatives, focusing
on how they were sold to the public. She’s put together a
great book: "Another Science Fiction,” which is largely a
collection of advertisements for space contractors during the Cold
War.
SImultaneously recruiting employees while dangling the lure of
space exploration to the masses, these ads ran in such magazines as
LIFE and National Geographic. I remember many of them, but
Prelinger's book is the first to collect them and show how vital
they were in shaping a new vision of space.
Inthis must-read interview at
WIRED, Prelinger talks about the
impact of space advertising, what could have been bigger than
Apollo, and how countercultural utopias figured into the space
race. Fascinating.
My fascination with old and abandoned things often leads to dreams
of great discoveries. Though I've been to a few abandoned places -
all of which are pretty well known, at least locally - I'm
handicapped by geography. Here in rural Oregon, there just aren't
many such places.
There weren't enough people here to have produced a large
urban/industrial base a century ago, our technological history
doesn't go back much more than 175 years in any case, and we've
never exactly been a hotbed of military activity. Thus my dreams of
being the first (or, at least, one of the very few) to visit such a
site remain elusive.
Other people are more fortunate. A British film crew just last year
found the remains of the Aqua Traiana headwaters, the beginnings of
a lost aqueduct that once supplied Rome with fresh water. It's
beautiful and amazingly well preserved, and all lying below a pig
pasture near the village of Manziana, just northwest of Rome.
For many years I've wandered the Northwest visiting ghost towns and
abandoned settlements, and always in the back of my mind are the
unanswered questions: why did people leave? What was is like to
live in a dying town? When did people finally figure out that their
town was destined for the dust bin of history? Did it happen
suddenly, or was it a slow, agonizing extinction?
These questions come to the forefront as I watch the continuing
downfall of one of America's proudest cities.
I'm not saying that Detroit is going to disappear like, oh, Bourne
(Oregon) did. It might, it might not. But it's clear that the
city's contraction leaves much doubt about its future, and the
glorious past of the former powerhouse remains to confront and
confound the present residents.
Today a rogue regime can acquire nuclear force simply by writing a
check. A really big check, no doubt, but child's play compared to
the old days.
If you wanted an atomic bomb back then, you had to work a lot
harder.
You see, we were absolutely convinced that our sole opponent in the
Cold War - the Soviet Union - wanted to bomb us out of existence.
We had our plans, our bombs, our missiles - and so did they.
We were always trying to find out what they were up to, and they
were doing likewise. That tug-of-war gave us a time of espionage,
spies and high intrigue.
Somehow, The Underwear Bomber just isn't as, well, romantic.
To illustrate my point, one of those Cold War skirmishes was fought
by an Iowa-boy-turned-Soviet agent named George Koval.It's an interesting story.
The siteEnglish Russiaentices me to
visit the former Soviet Union - the sheer number of abandoned
installations makes my head spin. Today the site beckons me with
two related stories about abandoned railways in the former
superpower.
First, a look at anever-operational line in northern
Siberia, apparently built at
Stalin's personal request. The reason for a railroad from nowhere
to nowhere remains a mystery, though in all fairness we do the same
thing with highways in Alaska.
The second is of alocomotive
depotin the same part of the
country, but these were all operational - until the USSR broke
apart. At some point, everyone just walked away...
The SHOT Show, that yearly orgy of all things that go 'bang',
starts next Tuesday. The products shown there will be arriving on
dealer's shelves over the coming months, but the ads will show up
almost immediately. That's how commerce is done.
It was serendipitous, then, that I recently ran across a site
calledVintage
Ad Browser. The site collects images
of old ads for all kinds of products, including guns and ammo. Just
like the SHOT Show, you'll find ads aimed at hunters, collectors,
and those interested in self defense:
Take a look - how many do you remember from your youth?
A lot of controversy still swirls over President Reagan's
space-based initiatives, collectively referred to as "Star Wars."
While a lot of Americans didn't take him seriously, some very
important Soviets did.
Once upon a time, two geeks met in college. They had some neat
ideas about the world of computers, and were anxious to put their
ideas into production. They started a little company.
Shortly after they incorporated, they introduced a new computer -
one that was more accessible, more flexible, and under the control
of a single person. They didn't make many of them, and very few
exist today, but with it they changed the face of computing
forever.
No, I'm not talking about Jobs & Wozniak. I'm thinking of Ken
Olsen and Harlan Anderson, and the company they founded -Digital Equipment Corporation. DEC, as it would come to
be known, introduced what was really the earliest commercial
incarnation of the personal computer: the PDP-1.
The PDP-1 certainly didn't look like what we've come to expect of
the PC. Nevertheless, it started the downsizing of computing power,
and introduced a concept critical to the modern PC: user
interaction, as opposed to batch data processing. This shift was
the necessary step to creating true personal computers, and DEC got
there first.
Interactivity opened up huge new vistas for the computer. The PDP-1
has the distinction of initiating things we now take for granted:
text editing, music programs, and even computer gaming. (The very
first computer video game, 'Spacewar!', was written for the PDP-1.
Yes, you have DEC to thank for your Wii.)
Back in '51, the Atomic Energy Research Establishment in
Oxfordshire welcomed a new member to their staff: a computer. Today
we don't even bat an eyelid when a new PC shows up in the office,
but back then computers were a Big Deal. (After all, how many new
staff members get their own office - the largest one in the
building?)
The
Harwell Computer, later to be known as
"WITCH" (Wolverhampton Instrument for Teaching Computing from
Harwell), now occupies a unique position in computing history. It
holds the distinction of being the world's oldest surviving
computer withelectronically-stored data and
programs. All the original parts are
present and it is capable, in theory, of being operated.
Though it hasn't been switched on for over 35 years, it is
nowbeing restored to operational statusat the Museum of
Computing at Bletchley Park. They expect the restoration to be
completed next summer, at which point the WITCH will be able to
claim another title: oldest operational computer, beating out
theFerranti Pegasuswhipper-snapper at London's
Science Museum.
The LIFE website this week unveiled aphoto retrospective of Project
Mercury, America's first human
spaceflight program. If you look at the picture captions, you'll
notice one name on most of them: Ralph Morse. There's a good reason
for that.
Ralph Morse was a staffer at LIFE (and later TIME) when he was
assigned to cover a press conference in Washington in 1959. That
event was the announcement of the Project Mercury astronauts.
Sensing the long term importance of the announcement, Morse
contacted his editor and told him that there would be a lot of
public interest in these men. He suggested that the magazine assign
someone permanently to NASA, which was then less than a year old.
Morse got the job.
It was a good choice; Morse had already been with LIFE for over a
decade, bringing back some of the most well known pictures in their
archives. NASA was a fledgling agency, and Morse had gotten himself
in on the ground floor of what would become the Space Race.
Over the next couple of decades, Morse would become an insider at
NASA. He got exclusive access, and was even allowed to place his
cameras in restricted areas his competition at NEWSWEEK couldn't
even dream of. Along the way, he produced some of the most iconic
images of the various NASA projects.
It all started at that press conference, where an idiot reporter
(some things never change) asked the astronauts which of them
expected "to come back alive." Morse grabbed this shot of the
astronauts showing their mettle:
Some of his shots were very well known...
...while others weren't:
All of them, though, came fromthe camera of an inventive geniuswhose enthusiasm
for his job knew no bounds. Were it not for his eye, his ingenuity,
and his nose for news, we wouldn't have this great visual record of
our nation's greatest achievements. George Hunt, at one time LIFE's
Managing Editor, said “if LIFE could afford only one
photographer, it would have to be Ralph Morse.”
Ralph is now 92, but unfortunately for us gave up photography some
years ago.
I decided that I'd raked enough muck for one week, and that you
deserved a day off. So, it's Friday Surprise time again! (Don't
worry, I'll resume the Self Defense series on Monday.)
Today we're going to see what happens when a megalomaniac decides
that he needs to export the American Way Of Life into a jungle. In
Brazil.Let's just say things didn't go as
planned.
This Teletype is identical to the one I used in high school to
access a computer timeshare system. Back in the mid-'70s, practical
personal computers were still a ways off, and even minicomputers
(like the DEC PDP-11) were far too expensive for most high schools
to purchase. The affordable way to computer power was to buy a
subscription to time on a mainframe computer, and dial in on their
telephone lines.
Our school was out in the boonies (no, seriously, we were) and we
linked to a computer located in Portland (OR). We used the ASR-33
above to interact with the computer. The dial on the right was used
to call one of the access numbers; if it was busy, we tried the
next one.
As I recall, we had three numbers on which we had access, and if
all three of them were busy (other users of the service), we had to
wait until a line was free. For those who have grown up never
having used a rotary phone, there was no such thing as speed dial
or automatic redial!
We could use the paper tape reader on the left of the machine to
feed in a program, or to save a program from the computer's memory.
At the blazing speed of 10 characters per second, it took a LONG
time to feed in a program - sometimes 30 minutes or more. We had a
couple of large filing cabinets full of paper tape rolls, programs
that other students had written or ones which the company supplied
to us.
The computer output was printed on the typewriter in the center of
the console. It used a roll of paper that was about 8" wide, and in
our case was a dull yellow color.
Yes, I'm old, but your turn is coming, kids - someday your children
will be laughing at the idea of your beloved iPod!
In 1874, The Netherlands had been only a few years divorced from
Belgium. They had a small, weak army, no real allies, and not a lot
of money. They did, however, worry about invasion from German, and
so decided to fortify Amsterdam.
Remember the "not a lot of money" thing? Their poverty lead them to
observe that concrete was expensive, but water was cheap. Their
logical conclusion was to build a wall of water to keep invading
armies out. They'd do this by purposely flooding the farmland
around their own city. Seriously. They thought it was a great
idea.
Of course, during World War II theStelling van Amsterdam(Defence Line of Amsterdam)
was obsoleted very quickly by mechanized armies and air power. All
that's left now are a few national monuments and some parks.
I now realize that I like looking at beautiful sunrises more than
beautiful sunsets. I'm sure there is some deep psychological
significance to that preference, but it as yet escapes me.
---
Everyone, it seems, is making a "tactical" pen these days.
Benchmade, Schrade, Tuffwriter, Hinderer, Surefire -and now Smith & Wesson. Who will be next?
I have nothing against the concept, as it's simply a return to the
roots of the familiar Kubotan (the techniques for which were
originally intended for the common Cross-type pen.) These, though,
all look like rejects from The Mall Ninja Outlet Store. I have half
a mind to make one myself - classically styled out of real
rust-blued steel, of course.
---
One of the better (most balanced) preparedness blogs extant is Jim
Rawle's SurvivalBlog.com It's one of the few blogs on my morning
"must read" list, and has been since I found it several years
ago.This morning he posted the sad newsthat his wife
Linda has died after a long illness.
He's shared the progress of his beloved in the blog, and while not
a shock it's still depressing to hear. My wife and I extend our
heartfelt condolences to Jim and his family.
---
It's necessary, if one is to maintain proper perspective, to learn
from those whose experience is different from yours. Take, for
example, aninterview with a WWII Soviet tank crewman(thanks to Tam, who finds the most amazing
stuff.) What he says about the Sherman tank, the Tommy gun, and the
.45ACP cartridge are very interesting and definitely challenge
certain widely held opinions.
(When you read what he says about the mighty .45, think back to the
very similar stories regarding the .30 Carbine.) If you have any
interest in WWII, armaments, or the nitty-gritty of battle, it's a
great read.
One might think that this era in history is the most well
documented that has ever existed. Why, we have photography and
sound recording and movies (and their digital equivalents.)
Everything, it seems, has been saved for posterity. How much better
preserved we are than our forebears!
Yep, you'd think so. And you'd be dead wrong.
There are huge gaps in our archival record, and oddly enough they
have to do with the very things that should be most easily
chronicled: our technology. Obsolete technology is disappearing,
and with it a vital understanding of what we as a species have
accomplished in this world. Decorative arts seem to be deemed
worthy of perpetuation, no matter their relative importance, while
everything else is consigned to the scrap heap.
Take just the computer - there are surprisingly few organizations
who have made an effort to preserve this recent technology. With
programmable computers being no more than about 60 years old, we
should have a very good record of all that has passed in their
development. We don't. Old computers are rare, and the earliest
(physically largest) machines are virtually all gone. Of those
first pioneers we have nothing but a few bad photos and the
occasional fragmentary drawing.
That's just the tip of the iceberg. There are many other gaps in
our historical records through which technologies, people,
organizations, and companies have fallen. There are a few places
attempting to preserve bits and pieces of our technological past,
and one of them is theSouthwest Museum of
Engineering, Communications and Computation
(SMECC).
SMECC maintains a fascinating site that gives a good feeling for
the breadth of their collections. Particularly valuable are the
first-person chronicles of the people who actually made the things
in the museum's collection.
A warning: their site is perhaps the worst example of Microsoft
FrontPage design. It's not nice to look at, not well laid out, and
you'll have to poke around to find the gems. It feels like a
throwback to the early '90s internet, which I suppose one could
argue is appropriate for a museum. (With all that, it's still
better than the average MySpace page.)
Any self-respecting geek could easily spend days there. Whether
you're into computers, radios, or microscopes, SMECC has something
for you.
Back in 1999 there was a Titan missile base for sale in California
- Chico, if memory serves. If the salesman's information was to be
believed, it was it great good condition, unlike most such
abandoned facilities. I was fascinated by the possibilities of one
of those huge complexes, but it was my brother who came up with the
bright idea to buy the thing, convert it into a "Y2K Survival
Community", and sell condos to rich people skittish about the
coming millennium.
He figured that the three silos - each 150 deep and 55 feet in
diameter - would net 45 condos of about 2,300 square feet each.
Were there that many gullible millionaires who could be relieved of
their money, if they could be assured that their families would
survive the coming catastrophe? People in Hollywood are infamous
for their susceptibility to even wilder schemes, so it seemed
plausible.
Of course we never got beyond the talking stage, and as we all know
nothing much happened on New Years Day 2000. It was fun to
speculate and scheme, though!
That was as close as I ever got to one of those behemoth
underground complexes. I've always wanted to visit one, but never
have, and thus have settled for doing so vicariously.
Just as I did withthisandthisfrom
www.terrastories.com
I've featured a number of decay-chronicling websites, but this one
is unique.onlynDetroit.comdoesn't just show the
deterioration of a once-proud city, it gives the why and how of
urban decay. In its many pages you'll learn the stories behind the
landmarks, where they came from and how they happened to get where
they are today. Along with the analysis is the occasional
prescription for renewal, and a happy ending or two as some
eyesores get refurbished and reopened.
The photography isn't of the same standards as some urban
exploration sites, spelling errors abound, and the text sometimes
describes scenes for which there are no pictures - but those are
minor quibbles that only help prove that the whole is greater than
the sum if its parts. onlynDetroit.com is obviously the work of
people who have great affection for their city despite its flaws,
and the same can be said of their site. A great place to kill some
free time.
The only area in which I feel inferior to Europeans is in the
history of our respective lands. I once worked with a fellow who
grew up in England, who told me the house in which his family lived
was the newest on the block - and it was built in the mid-18th
century. Here in the U.S., we just don't have century after century
of defined habitation to study. Given my love of old and abandoned
buildings, it's torture learning about the great ruins the
Europeans get to explore!
I'm novexillologist, nor do I play one on TV. I
am, however, fascinated by historical flags. The synthesis of
design, color, and history make them irresistible (to me, at
least.)
Take the flags of the American Revolution, for example. Everyone
knows the Gadsen flag:
Far fewer are familiar with the Fort Moultrie flag:
An acquaintance of mine once experienced a burglary of his house.
They got away with some valuable items, but I wondered just how the
thieves were planning to profit from them. They couldn't pawn them,
and if they tried to sell them on the street they'd be laughed to
the curb. I couldn't imagine a thief stupid enough to steal this
guy's stuff.
You see, this acquaintance was an electrical engineer who collected
weird pseudo-medical devices. He'd found a surprising number over
the years, and apparently he's not alone - there are a lot of
quackery collectors who have put their finds on the net.
One of my favorite items is the The Neu-Vita Oculizer:
From www.americanartifacts.com, it is supposed to fix your eyes so
that you no longer need glasses. It has two sets of eye cups; the
soft rubber ones use a crank and pulley system to rotate them
against your eyes, while the other side carries hard rubber
eyecups. They have a concave faced plunger to poke the eye when the
rubber bulbs are squeezed, and vacuum can also be applied by
covering the air intake hole and releasing the bulb.
Yeah, just what I want to do to my eyes! Anyhow, that's just one of
the many places on the net that you can find the history of
quackery. (Sadly, most of the sites have designs that seem stuck in
the mid-1990s and a surprising lack of decent images.)
I've been collecting conspiracy theories for the ammo shortage, and
I recently heard a great one that supposedly came from a local gun
store: FEMA has been buying ammunition companies, then shutting
them down to eliminate all civilian ammunition sources.
One needs an awful lot of foil for a tin hat that big...
---
Uncle and I have something in
common: here in Oregon, our
legislature also passed a "no texting" law. We went further, though
- we added that you couldn't use a handheld cel phone at all. Then
we enacted $2 billion of new taxes and spending in the state with
the second-highest unemployment in the nation. We're number 49!
We're number 49! Go team!
If it's as accurate as expected, I may have to own one. (Sure, I
could build one myself, but I'm too busy doing guns for other
people. Remember the parable about the shoemaker's children?)
Now, if we could just get them to cease doing business with H-S
Precision...
---
Dr. Helen brings us the storyof a woman who
fought back against her knife-wielding rapist. Read the comments -
some insightful, and some very amusing (in a train wreck sort of
way.)
---
From the Irish Timescomes news that the
powers-that-be want to ban "practical" shooting (i.e. IPSC, IDPA.)
The Irish Minister for Justice, Dermot Ahern, had this to
say:
“It’s
simply not in the public interest to tolerate the development of a
subculture predicated on a shooting activity which by the liberal
standards of the US is regarded as an extreme shooting activity."
He said any cursory research on the internet showed that these
activities were marketed as being at the “extreme end”
of handgun ownership and were “anathema to the tradition of
Irish sporting clubs”.
Kodachrome
They give us those nice bright colors
They give us the greens of summers
Makes you think all the world's a sunny day, Oh yeah
I got a Nikon camera
I love to take a photograph
So mama don't take my Kodachrome away
Kodachrome wasn't the first time the company had influenced musical
history, however. It's true that Kodachrome was invented by a
couple ofamateur chemistswho were alsoprofessional musicians, but the influence I'm
thinking of goes far deeper.
As it happens George Eastman, the founder of Eastman Kodak, was an
aspiring flutist and music fanatic. His love of making and
listening to music led him to found theEastman School of Music, cementing his place in
American music history.
Now you're probably thinking "Eastman School of Music? Never heard
of it!" Most people, when asked to name a prestigious music school,
immediately think "Juilliard." While Juilliard is a fine school and
better known to the general public, those with a deep knowledge of
musical education will often quietly refer you to Eastman. Since
1921, Eastman graduates have enjoyed a solid reputation for being
"musician's musicians", which persists to this day - it is often
ranked as the top music school in the country in major media
surveys.
George Eastman was a remarkable
individualwho also gave major grants
to engineering and technical schools such as MIT, and involved
himself in a range of social and business innovations. It could be
argued, though, that giving the world both Kodachrome andFrederick Fennellwould have been enough for
any one person.
In January 1940, theSoviet
Union was at war with Finland. Just a few months earlier,
the Soviets had signed a non-agression pact with the German
government, which besides promising to be Best Friends Forever,
divided up the countries of Eastern Europe between the two powers.
The two chums lost no time in invading and carving up Poland, and
that success prompted Uncle Joe Stalin to go for the first country
on his own shopping list: Finland.
While his generals mapped out invasion plans, Finland was issued a
set of demands to adjust their borders and "lease" part of their
territory to Moscow. They refused, and in late November of 1939 the
Soviets attacked.
Though eventually negotiating a truce, Finland managed to inflict
severe casualties on the Red forces. Nikita Khrushchev would later
state that his country had lost a million soldiers, while the
Finnish casualties amounted to 26,662.
Forty-six of that million were killed when their submarine, dubbed
S-2, was sunk in the waters between Sweden and Finland on that cold
January day.
The actual location of the wreck, and the precise cause of the
sinking, remained a mystery until just a few months ago. After a
decade of searching, a team of Swedish and Finnish divers located
the S-2 and found out just what had happened.
Many people have heard of theMaginot
line,
a series of fortifications designed to protect France from invasion
by Germany. As you may have heard, it didn't work all that well -
the Germans simply went around it, through Belgium and the
Netherlands, and right into Paris for coffee and gloating.
You may not have heard of theMannerheim line. It was Finland's
fortification intended to protect it from Russian aggression.
During the Winter War (where the Soviets sustained losses heavy
enough to make them wish they'd never set their sights on Helsinki)
the Mannerheim sustained heavy damage. Unlike the Maginot line, the
Mannerheim was very lightly constructed and took the full force of
the Russian advance. The majority of the installations were
destroyed, leaving little behind but memories.
Back in 1959, Peter Sellers made a film that, today, is sadly
forgotten: "The Mouse That Roared."
The film relays the story of the tiny Duchy Of Grand Fenwick, which
declares war on the United States. (There is a lesson in the clip
that seems to have been lost in the intervening decades, but I'll
leave that to your discovery.)
The mythical Duchy, though, has little on some of the tiniest
'countries' in the world, places whose origins and history are even
more bizarre than Hollywood could concoct.
During the 1930s and 1940s, the Farm Security Administration (FSA)
and the Office of War Information (OWI) shot tens of thousands of
photographs. The vast majority - and the images we most associate
with their work - were in black and white:
However, there were a number of assignments which were shot in
color. That number was far smaller, likely because of budget
constraints, but produced some stunning images:
The Friday Surprise, for anyone who's been paying attention, is
often devoted to my love of the old and abandoned. (My arch
nemesis, TomW, will no doubt be along soon to point out that
revolvers fit into those categories. Thought I'd beat you to the
punch, Tommy!)
Where was I? Oh, right...anyhow, many times I'll drive along a
little-used road out on the middle of nowhere (Oregon has a lot of
that) and see an abandoned homestead. They always get me to
wondering: why did people walk away from that home? Why didn't
someone else take it over? Was it a lack of something, or an
overabundance of something else? Of course I never find the
answers, but the questions come back with the next deserted
abode.
With that in mind, It's not surprising that I found this
article,Wrong Side Of
The Tracks, more than a little
interesting. It's an informed look at how neighborhoods become
extinct, about how a single house may not always be the whole
story, and how this kind of occurrence isn't confined to the
hinterlands. A great read.
Or, How I Stopped Worrying And Learned To Love The Cruise
Missile!
It's late in World War II. You're Adolf Hitler. Things aren't going
all that swimmingly: the Russians are using your troops as
landfill, the British and Americans took out your vacation home
(along with everything else) in Dresden, and your girlfriend is
tired of the amount of time you spend at the office.
What's a despot to do?
That's right - you bring in whatever weapon designers you have left
after your latest loyalty purge, and tell them you want to be able
to precisely target those dastardly Brits - down to the very
building in which Churchill buys his favorite cigars.
Lo and behold, one of those designers comes up with a human-guided
bomb launched from a glider (because powerful digital computers and
GPS systems are still a little ways off, and conscripts are cheaper
anyway.)
Well, you're not alone. This blob of corroded bronze was discovered
off the Greek isle of Antikythera in 1900. In the decades since,
archaeologists have been baffled by (and no doubt argued
about)just what the thing was - let alone what it
did.
The Antikythera Mechanism, as it came to be known, remained an
enigma until the 21st century - when advanced imaging techniques
allowed researchers to see into the amorphous blob, identifying
gears and inscriptions. As it turns out, the Mechanism is amechanical computer to predict astronomical
data- the solunar cycle,
eclipses, and even Olympic years and the intersection of all of
those.
From those images, a British gentleman - one Michael Wright - was
able to build a working replica of the Mechanism. Here, for the
first time in over 2,000 years, you can see what it actually
did:
The Mechanism is exciting in two ways: first, and most obvious, is
that is shows a level of mechanical design and workmanship that is
a full millennia ahead of what we thought was possible. Scientists
date the mechanism to about 100 B.C.E, and comparable clockwork
mechanisms don't show up again until more than a thousand years
later.
Second, it suggests that the people who constructed it had an
understanding of the concepts of a heliocentric (sun-centered)
universe, which would not become accepted for nearly 1,500 years
after the Mechanism had been built.
What is interesting to me is the idea that knowledge - in this
case, mechanical and astronomical - can be forgotten, at least in a
cultural sense. In this age of abundant and ubiquitous information,
it is hard to accept it as a perishable commodity. It makes one
wonder: what else have we forgotten?
Many years ago, I worked with a fellow who'd been raised on the
east side of London. His stories about the Thames were romantic and
intriguing: you could, he swore, walk along the banks of the river
and pick up small items - clay pipes, etc. - that dated back four
or five centuries. That wasn't surprising, he said, in a land where
a 300-year-old house might be the new one on the block.
I never made it to England to find out if what he said could really
be done, but there's no doubt of the history of the country. In our
little land we get excited about something that is a mere century
old, but in England that probably wouldn't rate a yawn.
Given that the Thames is so historically important, and that it
flows through one of the most densely populated areas of the
planet, its treasures should be well known. That, however, is not
the case. A recent salvage expedition in the Thames Estuary - which
is the area where the Thames runs into the North Sea - netted some
seven forgotten shipwrecks, ranging from 1940 all the way back to
1665.
The interesting thing to me is that the operation was carried out
in waters "up to" 16 meters deep - that's only about 50 feet. You'd
think that some of those wrecks would have presented navigational
hazards over the years, thus charted and hardly in need of
discovery. It's when you combine the size of the Estuary (it's
huge), the water visibility (roughly zero), and the extreme tides
(up to 13 feet!), you begin to see how such things might get
lost.
Back in the 1950s, General Motors was at the top of their game.
Their cars were selling well, and many consider 1957 the peak of
their design and marketing prowess.
At lot of that was due to their concept or "show cars." Like today,
those were vehicles built to show their prowess and to gauge
consumer reaction. Some of their design details would make it to
production, some wouldn't, but they were all interesting to see -
even a half-century later.
That's a quote from one of my favorite photographers,Lifemagazine's fantastically
greatRalph
Morse, about his rivals atNewsweek. Ralph, it was said, was of
the "old school" - a term once used to describe a code of behavior,
before the "hip hop" generation co-opted it to describe MTV's
previous seasons.
It's ironic that Ralph's words came on the eve of his coverage of
the first Space Shuttle launch in 1981, because it wasthis article
on Soviet cosmonaut deathswhich brought them back to
me. The combination caused me to think not only about the attitude
of the gracious winner, but of the trials and tribulations of the
losers in all high-stakes games.
While I'm proud of U.S. achievements in space (I am a child of the
Sputnik Era, after all), I'm simultaneously saddened at the loss of
life experienced by our (former) enemies. I'm not talking about the
maudlin, paralyzing, "new age sensitive man who cries at the drop
of a hat" kind of sadness, but rather a genuine empathy for those
who attempt something great and leave the world poorer by their
absence.
Like our astronauts, the cosmonauts were proud of their homeland.
They were willing to put their lives on the line to advance not
only their nationalistic pride, but something more. There was an
altruistic component to their flights, which they seemed to know
were advancing science and technology to benefit all those who were
firmly anchored to terra firma. Even as we celebrate our own
successes we need to be reminded that we are as much in their debt
as they are in ours.
We see where we are today only because we stand on the shoulders of
all those who came before us.
I suspect, in this Age of Wii, that board games are solidly out of
fashion. When I was a kid that was most assuredly not the
case!
Growing up on the farm, there was no such thing as cable (or
satellite) television; music was on vinyl records, not iPods; and
personal computers, let alone the internet, weren't even on the
horizon. Board games were therefore a significant portion of our
recreational activities, and we looked forward to getting together
with friends and playing our favorites.
The king of games, of course, was theall-time best seller: Monopoly - "by Parker
Brothers", as the TV commercials reminded us. Kids liked it, adults
liked it. Everyone, it seems, enjoyed passing the time by passing
"GO" - and collecting $200.
I just came up with a hot idea for a film script. We take an
archeaologist who is obsessed with the Holy Grail, and we set him
out on a search for it...and we'll throw in some evil Nazis who are
just waiting to get it for themselves! Wouldn't that make a great
movie??
DARPAwas founded to
do fundamental, high-risk research into science and technology that
could be used for military purposes. Today that sounds ominous and
vaguely sinister, but in the 1950s it was exciting and
patriotic.
One of their
projects was called ARPANET(Advanced Research Projects
Agency Network), intended as a way for DARPA staffers and
researchers to disseminate information and share computing
resources. It introduced email, file transfers, and even voice
protocols into common use, all made possible through the magic of
packet switching - another DARPA innovation. This groundbreaking
computer network would, with their guidance,evolve into what we now call the
internet.
(Funny, isn't it - the internet upon which you can read
anti-military and anti-American rants until your eyes launch
themselves from their sockets is the product of an American
military project. Euro-weenies will no doubt point out that the
World Wide Web was the invention of an Englishman working at a
Swiss lab, but his contribution - important as it is - was simply a
way of easing access to information on the already vast internet.
His work would not even have been necessary had it not been for
DARPA.)
The computer network wasn't DARPA's only development, of course -
the magnificent Saturn V rocket and the computer mouse both came
from the think tanks at the agency. How's that for a wide ranging
legacy?
When I was a wee lad, America was at the forefront of space
exploration. By the time I was old enough to know what was going
on, we'd recovered from the shock of the Soviets beating us into
space, and had responded in a big way with Gemini and Apollo
programs.
In those days, our grade school classes would literally come to a
halt as we gathered around a television set to watch a liftoff or a
splashdown. The mighty Saturn V rockets - spewing a fireball that
remains unequalled for sheer excitement - would take our astronauts
into space for yet another thrilling mission. Landing men on the
moon was our crowning achievement, watched by just about everyone
in the country.
Space flights were national events on a scale that I haven't seen
since - and probably never will again. The SuperBowl and American
Idol Finals may draw larger audiences, but in terms of captivating
our collective conscious, of instilling pride in our country and
what we were capable of doing, they will ever equal the NASA of the
mid 20th century.
There are very few things that can start a raging debate like
politics, religion - or the Civil War. Get a few people together,
perhaps with some adult beverages, ask them what started the war,
and wait for the fireworks.
(Personally, this Yankee reserves his invective for President
Lincoln. Regardless of the actual cause of the conflict, the fact
remains that he was the first President to invalidate whole
sections of the Constitution to further his schemes. That modern
day leftists rail against President Bush's encroachments on civil
liberties, but give the far more Machiavellian Lincoln a free pass,
never fails to astonish me. But I digress...)
Anyhow, the actual conduct of the war itself is fascinating. In
just a few short years, we leapt from smoothbore muzzleloaders to
self-contained metallic cartridge rifles. (There were times when
both would serve on the same field of battle, a clash of
technologies that would be roughly analogous to having Sopwith
Camels and F-15s serving in the same theater of operations.)
Espionage, sabotage, psychological warfare, and manipulation of
public opinion as tools of war saw similar advancements. Not all of
the operations would work out too well, though, andthe story of
Captain Thomas Henry Hines is a great
example.
As a child of the West, I'm generally not one to get excited about
the upper-right quadrant of our country. I've visited the
northeast, and in general am not all that attracted to the region.
However, one thing the inhabitants of the region have that
I'mquitejealous of are layers of old
infrastructure, just waiting to be explored.
In the distant past my job occasionally required me to travel to
upstate New York. Even the things that residents of the area
consider commonplace - say, the remnants of the Erie Canal - just
fascinated me, because of the long and storied past of that
engineering marvel. Thus I spent a large portion of my "off" time
visiting local museums and historical attractions.
On one visit to the Rochester area, I took the time to follow the
Canal's path from there to Tonawanda. Since I was in the
"neighborhood" - literally just a few miles - I made the short hop
up to see the fabled Niagara Falls. (It must be said that even I,
somewhat jaded by
close encounters with much higher waterfalls, was amazed at Niagara
Falls. It's worth the trip.)
One of my favorite
abandoned/unknonwn/old technology subjects is the fabled Beach
Pneumatic Transit System in Manhattan. Nothing exists of it today -
neither facilities nor artifacts - butthis article
at Damn Interestinggives the best overview I've
seen of the ill-fated project.
As you may have guessed from
previous entries, history fascinates me. Not in the sense of
ancient history, or even battle locations and dates; the history
I'm interested in is the history of technology. I'm interested in
the history that was displayed in what used to be known as "science
and industry" museums, before those institutions got caught up in
showcasing meaningless "interactive" exhibits carefully crafted so
as not to "offend" anyone (while managing to avoid any real
education in the process.)
Anyhow, part of the history of technology is how products were
represented to the buying public. The product logo, aside from
showing the pride of the people who made it, served as a point of
reference (and sometimes of reverence) for those who might decide
to own the thing.
Students of espionage and
surveillance (which every security-conscious person should be)
understand how intelligence is actually gathered, and it isn't the
way it happens in Hollywood.
Those who watch too much TV think that security breaches come fully
formed - that damaging information is gleaned nearly whole, needing
only a few minor details filled in to make it valuable. While that
may occasionally be true for satellite imaging, when putting
together information gathered "on the ground" it is more like doing
a jigsaw puzzle.
In reality, it is the small bits of information, gleaned from many
sources, that form the picture one's opponent seeks. Even seemingly
innocuous minutiae, in the hands of a skilled intelligence analyst,
can help to flesh out a growing body of actionable information.
Such little things - usually gathered informally and from the
unwitting - are amazing valuable to the right person.
Back in World War II, the military needed to impress this concept
on the U.S. population. "Mass media" back then meant radio,
newspapers, and - most graphically - posters. Lots and lots of
posters. Eye catching, colorful posters - works of art in their own
right.
For those that actually
remember the dawn of the computer age (my first computer experience
was on a time-shared GE 600-series mainframe), looking over old
computer advertisements brings a flood of reactions: amusement,
embarrassment, and the occasional "I wish I'd bought their stock
when it was first offered." (Of course, there is also the "I'm glad
I didn't buy any of their stock!")
Take a look
at these vintage ads.I particularly like the one
explaining what email is - not just for the content, but for the
company promoting the concept. (Honeywell, once a player in
mainframe computers, is perhaps best known these days for making
thermostats - which is what they made before they bought their way
into the computer business.)
If you've been reading this
screed for any length of time, you know my fascination with old and
abandoned places. WebUrbanist, a site that deals with various
cultural scenes and artifacts from all over the world, has
sometimes fed this addiction of mine.
- I got an email from a fellow who referred to me as having an
"influential position" in the industry. Huh?? Since when? Does he
know something I don't? Apparently I didn't get that memo...and
neither did anyone at Ruger, Dan Wesson, or Colt. (I notice that I
have yet to be invited to any industry junkets - I hear about them
fromAFGWWWTRA.
It's probably because I don't have a big enough audience here at
the Revolver Liberation Alliance. Guess I'll have to get a regular
column in one of the magazines, then I'll get invited to all the
"right" parties!)
- Thanks to all who expressed sympathy for my tendonitis. It's
healing, slowly, but improvement has been noticed. I managed to get
in a fairly normal work schedule last week, though I still can't
lift anything that is moderately heavy and requires a strong grip -
say, a quart of milk out of a grocery sack on the floor. I hate
this whole aging process; I honestly thought that I could somehow
avoid it. Silly me.
- Someone emailed a query regarding a rumor he'd heard: that Colt
had sold the rights and plans for the Python to Wilson Combat, who
were to begin producing them "soon." I don't know where to start
with this one, but suffice it to say that it is far more suited for
April 1st than November 1st. (Should you ever be involved in a game
of "gunsmith trivia", both Bill Wilson and I started out in life as
watchmakers. True story.)
- Finally, Tam recently postedanother in
her "Sunday Smith" series: the Model 15. I just wish she'd show
equal love to the Colts in her collection. (Uhh, Tam, you DO have
non-reciprocating Colts in your safe, don't you? Tam?
Hello??)
You may recall that back during World War II, we developed the
first operational nuclear bomb. It was a massive effort, with the
epicenter in Alamogordo, New Mexico. So, why was it called the
"Manhattan Project"?
Many believe that it was a name picked to draw attention away from
the desert southwest, to confuse the enemy by calling it by
something completely unrelated to the project. A little security
sleight-of-hand, as it were.
Owing to my unnatural fascination with old and abandoned things, I
find the concept of an aircraft boneyard to be absolutely
irresistible. The most famous of them is no doubt theAerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Centeroutside of
Tucson, butthere are
others.
The Russianshave such
things, too, and they can be a
fascinating glimpse into the "other side" of the Cold War.
It's confession time: I'm a
geek. A card carrying,
spent-all-my-high-school-time-in-the-library,
know-how-to-use-a-sliderulegeek. I love computers,
think physics should be taught in kindergarden, and generally find
technology of all kinds (modern to ancient) fascinating.
Seems I'm not the only gun blogger to claim that moniker: the
infamousTam purports to be a geek, too - but is she? Is
shereally?
Oh, yeah, she makes a big deal about her old computers - but did
she ever have aDEC
PDP-11/70(runningRSTS, no less) in her garage
like I once did? I think not!
I, on the other hand, can prove my exalted status beyond a shadow
of doubt, as I possess theultimategeek credential: an amateur
radio license. No, not your simple no-code-Tech paper, but a real
I-passed-the-Morse-code-test-and-have-HF-privileges-to-show-for-it
General class ticket. In the world of the terminally socially
inept, the ham radio license is Da Bomb. Let's see you beat THAT,
Tam! Hah! Hah-hah-hah!
(I think I've been reading far too muchMogambo Guru. But I digress...)
This nerd calling-out is just a pathetically unimaginative way of
introducing today's topic: anabandoned Ionospheric Research Stationhidden deep in
the Ukrainian wilderness. You see, such installations are all about
antennas, and any ham radio operator worthy of the title is really
into antennas. I sure am; I have books about antennas, have
pictures of antenna installations, and generally love looking at
anything to do with antennas - the more esoteric, the better!
They don't come much grander than this one, courtesy - once again -
of that web site for all geeks, Dark Roasted Blend. (If after
viewing the site you have an irresistible urge to buy a pocket
protector, I cannot be held responsible!)
The "buddy movie" has become
a staple in Hollywood's bag of banal plot staples. They've given us
cop buddy movies, firefighter buddy movies, private eye buddy
movies, superhero buddy movies, and even suicidal women buddy
movies.
In the hands of a master, though, even a cliche becomes fresh and
intriguing. The master, in this case, is Akira Kurosawa, and the
movie in question is the superb "Dersu Uzala."
Dersu is a Nanai hunter who befriends - and is befriended by -
Captain Arsenyev, who is leading a surveying expedition in Siberia
just after the turn of the 20th century. Dersu is the
quintessential mountain man who is completely at home in nature,
while Arsenyev (and his crew of soldiers) are distinctly out of
place in the vast wilderness. Dersu becomes Arsenyev's friend,
showing him not just how to survive in the unforgiving landscape
but also a bit about the meaning of life.
Watch this clip, and note how Dersu not only sees subtle clues
around him, but how he cares for those who he may never meet:
Their friendship grows out of mutual respect, not bravado; what
they share is a heartfelt concern for the land and the people who
inhabit it, as well as the welfare of each other.
The movie is based on the autobiographical novel of the same name,
written by the real Captain Arsenyev about the real Dersu. Kurosawa
had read the book and desperately wanted to bring it to the big
screen, and in the 1970s finally got his chance - spending two full
years filming in the wilds of Siberia. The result may, as some
critics have suggested, be Kurosawa's most beautiful (and certainly
most underrated) work.
Because it is a true tale, this movie teaches us more about the
nature of friendship than anyone in Hollywood can fathom. There are
no plot twists and no happy ending; like life, it proceeds at its
own pace up to the poignant conclusion (which itself brings up back
to the start of the film, reminding us of the cycle of life.)
I saw this film many years ago, and I remembered it as being a
great story. Understand that I'm not a film buff - frankly, I find
it hard to sit through a whole movie - and certainly not a big
Kurosawa fan. That it is one of only a handful of films I actually
want to own tells you that it is something truly special.
Thanks to the generosity of a close friend I now have my own copy,
which I will treasure. The film is hard to find, but it is worth
the search. IfNessmukmeans anything
to you, Dersu Uzala will be one of your favorites too.
I'm sure that by now you're
quite tired of hearing about my interest in abandoned, secret, and
underground places. I love exploring such things, and rarely turn
down the chance to visit an old mine or poke around in the ruins
ofFort
Stevens, right here in Oregon. The
older, danker, and creepier they are the more i like them. I can't
explain this fascination, not even to myself!
I've been thinking that perhaps I've touched on this subject a bit
much, and thought that it was only fair to give some balance - a
counterpoint, as it were - to this keen interest of mine. Just so
you know that there are some places I definitely don't want to
explore, I give youabandoned bio-chem warfare
facilities.
I've previously mentioned
that I have a fascination with abandoned places, and even more for
abandoned/mothballed spaces that are underground.
Well, the folks over at Dark Roasted Blend have someamazing pictures of old underground
facilitiesaround the world. You won't
believe the Tokyo Storm Water System! (OK, it's not really
abandoned, but it's still awfully cool.)
(As you might have guessed, I'm a fan of the History Channel's
showCities of the Underworld. Check it out!)
Tam profiled another
revolver at The Arms Room this weekend. HerSmith & Wesson .44 Hand Ejector 2nd
Modelwas made in 1920, and has
period mother-of-pearl grips. She calls it a "tired" piece - and it
is - but I like honest wear on an old gun. Great historical
information in the article, as always.
---
I've played around a bit with the Steyr "M" series and their
"trapezoidal" sights, and have yet to form a strong opinion one way
or the other. (My wife loves them, and Massad Ayoob thinks they're
neat, so apparently they have some utility - despite being
relegated to the top of a self-shucking firearm. Blech.)
Apparently the Steyr effort wasn't lost on the folks at SureSight,
who've developeda sight that
is obviously inspired by Steyr's(though by no means a copy.)
Interesting - too bad they don't make them to fit revolvers, as I'd
like to try them out. (Just because I shoot a revolver, and have
something of a reputation as a Luddite where firearm sights are
concerned, doesn't mean that I'm totally opposed to something that
will help me shoot better. They simply have to show me some marked
advantage over what I have now!)
---
Speaking of sights, the Israeli company NorthEast Technologies
(NET) has developed what they are not-so-modestly referring to as
a"revolutionary" handgun sight. Basically, it's a long
fiber optic that mounts to the rear of the slide, replacing the
front and rear sights. (It reminds me of the late and hardly
lamented ASP Guttersnipe that was mounted on their namesake
modified S&W 39 autpistol.) Simply place the glowing red dot on
the target, and pull the trigger - at least, that's how NET says it
works. Hmmm...where have I heard that one before?
Still, if it works well and has no major disadvantages, it may
prove to be useful for some folks. Like the SureSight, I'll believe
it when I see it. (Maybe I was actually born in the "Show Me"
state?)
So you're on your way home
from a hard day's work in Cameroon. You pass through a small
village, where everyone is dead. No external evidence of foul play,
and it appears that they died very quickly - in the midst of their
daily activities.
The deaths aren't limited to people. Animals for miles around died
in their tracks, and just like the humans show no signs of foul
play. The toll would eventually be 1,800 people and double that
number of animals, all killed at the same time.
Investigators were baffled. Eventually, though, they did find the
answer - and it was one worthy of a television show. It turns out
that the mysterious killer had more in common with a bottle of soda
than with a psychopath.
Back when I was a teenager, I
apprenticed to a master watch- and clock-maker. He was an older
fellow - in his early 70s - and had been in the business for a very
long time.
I enjoyed looking around his shop in spare moments, as he had many
old and wonderful gadgets on his jam-packed shelves. One one high
shelf, way in the back, was a little vial of off-white liquid. I
asked him what it was, and he said "radium paint. We used to use it
to make the numbers on dials visible in the dark. Don't touch
it!"
He never did explain to me why I shouldn't touch it, but I obeyed
his command and forgot all about it. That is, until I ran
acrossthis article
on US Radium, the company that made the paint
in that little bottle.
During World War II, Oregon had
the singular distinction of being attacked by the Empire of Japan
not once, not twice -but on three separate occasions.It would seem that the war
planners in Tokyo had it out for us!
In early 1942, Fort Stevens - which stood guard at the mouth of the
Columbia River - was shelled by the Japanese submarine I-25. Just a
few months later that same submarine, this timefitted with
an underwater aircraft hangar, launched a small airplane and
bombed our southern coast. Finally, in 1944, the Japanese military
launched aseries
of balloon bombsagainst North America, most of
which landed in the forests of Oregon. One of those balloons landed
in south-central Oregon, and killed 6 people - the only war
casualties to occur in the mainland United States.
So, why Oregon? Basically, because we were the most convenient yet
lightly defended target available to them. There is a lesson in
that...
In 1988, at a facility near
Henderson, Nevada, something really bad - and really loud -
happened.
Pacific Engineering Production Company, aka PEPCON, was a producer
of ammonium perchlorate - a very powerful oxidizer for rocket fuel.
Ammonium perchlorate, as it happens, is very unstable and doesn't
like fire one little bit.
Coincidentally, there was a repair crew on a television transmitter
tower nearby, and not only did they witness the whole inferno they
also captured an incredible video sequence of the main explosions.
You just have to see it - watch for the shock wave as it travels
across the ground!
Gukanjima ("Battleship"), also
known as Hashima ("Border") Island sits a mere 15 kilometers from
Nagasaki. It is one of 505 uninhabited islands of the Nagasaki
Prefecture - but it was not always that way.
In 1890, Japan's industrialization was just gaining steam, and they
needed coal to make that steam. Mitsubishi (yes, that Mitsubishi)
bought the island that year, with the intention of mining the coal
reserves that stretched beneath it. Mitsubishi built a city on the
tiny island (only 15 acres) that eventually housed an incredible
5300 people - giving it, for a time, the highest population density
on earth.
By the 1960s, coal had fallen out of favor around the world, and
Japan was no exception. They began shrinking operations at the
mines, and in 1974 closed the mines - and the island -
completely.
Today the empty city stands, its once-bustling buildings being
reclaimed by the force of wind and rain. Travel to the island is
prohibited, but some intrepid photographers have made the trip to
capture haunting images like these.
You know, I had a pretty darned
good childhood. I grew up on a small farm, outside a small town (I
remember when the town passed the 1500 resident milestone) that was
nestled in the foothills of the Cascade Range.
After chores were finished and if there were no other pressing jobs
to be done (like hauling hay), I got to do what I wanted. I could
go down to our pond and fish, or take off with my friends Dan
and/or Tom for an overnight camping trip - all with very little
administrative (parental) hand-wringing. Even a two-day trip up the
river and into the woods wasn't out of the question, though such an
outing did prompt some worrying from my mother.
Not a bad way to grow up!
Living as I do in suburbia, I long for the time when we would run
into the forest with little more than a small tent, a blanket, a
sheath knife, maybe a couple cans of baked beans, and a fishing
pole. (If we planned our trip into a particular area that we knew
contained several small caves, we didn't even bother with the
tent.) Woodcraft, such as shelter building and fire making, was an
expected part of any well-balanced upbringing. I miss those
days.
I have found a way to keep the hunger for simpler times at bay: I
curl up with Nessmuk.
What is a Nessmuk? Properly, the question is phrased "Who is
Nessmuk?"
Nessmuk was in normal existence one George Washington Sears. Sears
was a slight, asthmatic individual who was born in 1821 in
Massachusetts, and spent much of his life - at least, that portion
when he wasn't working just to finance his next adventure - in a
canoe or on a boat or in the woods.
He was able to combine his love of the outdoors and his
considerable talent as a writer by having narratives of his
adventures published inForest and Streammagazine.
He wrote two books,WoodcraftandCamping,
which are still in print - combined into one volume titledWoodcraft and
Camping(no surprise there, right?!?) It
is still available to this day, which must be some sort of record
in the publishing business. (Another book, calledAdirondack
Letters,
is a compilation of his articles in Forest and Stream.)
Woodcraft and
Campingis
not a thick book, nor is it solely a "how to" manual. It is the
collected wisdom and insights of a man who lived just to be able to
commune with nature. Nessmuk wrote in a beautiful, lyrical style
that makes the reader salivate with the desire to get out into the
wilderness.
At only $6.95, I believe it to be one of the greatest bargains - as
well as one of the "must haves" - in outdoor literature. I cannot
recommend this book highly enough to anyone who enjoys living in
and exploring the wilderness, or even just dreaming about it!
Today's cel phone technologies
rely on something called "spread spectrum," which is a fancy way of
saying "frequency hopping." In spread spectrum, a data stream - in
this case a voice - is transmitted using radio waves whose carrier
rapidly switches between many frequencies, using a prearranged
sequence known to both transmitter and receiver.
The reason the spread spectrum is so important - aside from being
resistant to interference and very difficult to intercept - is
because it makes more efficient use of scarce bandwidth. Spread
spectrum makes it possible to carry more information - more
conversations - amongst a limited number of frequencies.
But this use is very recent. Prior to the invention of the cel
phone, frequency hopping was used to make military radio
transmissions more secure. Using frequency hopping makes it far
more difficult for an enemy to intercept your signal, and to use
direction finders to pinpoint your location. Of course, it isn't
just for voice! Frequency hopping makes it possible to have
radio-control munitions, such as bombs and torpedoes, that your
enemy can't jam into uselessness.
Now as useful as this is, one would think that the concept
originated deep in some Pentagon think tank - but you'd be wrong!
The idea came from the fertile mind of a beautiful woman, the
actress Hedy Lamarr.
I'll let you read the articles below to find out about her valuable
contribution to the world of communications
technology!
Aside from my preoccupation with
personal flying machines, I'm also fascinated by abandoned
buildings, old mines, and - even though I can't swim -
shipwrecks!
The schooner Milan operated on Lake Ontario and Lake Erie,
shuttling grain and other staples with its crew of nine men. In
October of 1849, it was heading to Cleveland with a load of salt
when it started taking on water. Despite the efforts of the crew,
the Milan sank into the cold depths of Lake Ontario, coming to rest
in over 200 feet of water.
The wreck was located in 2005, and a surprise awaited its
discoverers: it sits upright, completely intact, on the bottom of
the lake - even its masts are in place, sticking straight up from
the deck as they did when on the surface! It is a superbly
preserved example of early American sailing technology, and is an
important historical find (in addition to just being really
cool!)
This thread at GlockTalkseemed oddly familiar to me.
People routinely ask about the lifespan of a particular gun, while
at the same time suggesting that somehow the guns of yesteryear
would last longer under use than today's offerings. I'm not sure
that this is the case.
Let's jump back to, say, 1935 or so. Someone has just bought a new
.38 Special revolver (take your pick of quality makers) and a box
of ammunition - a box that might last them for a decade or
more!
What I've managed to decipher from the "old folks" I've talked with
is that they just didn't shoot guns all that much. There weren't a
lot of competitive shooting events back then, and even those that
existed demanded less ammunition in a year than a typical IDPA
match consumes in a weekend. A box of handgun ammo (50 rounds) per
year was considered a "lot" of shooting by many of these folks; at
that rate, our mythical revolver would be considered to have been
heavily used, having only seen a total of 3500 rounds!
Flash forward to 2006, and a certain maker says that their gun has
an "expected lifespan" of 6,000 rounds. Doesn't sound like much to
us, but it may be two or three (or possibly ten) times the number
of rounds that guns sold in 1935 would expect to see over their
lifetime.
Perspective, people. There is a lot to complain about in the
craftsmanship (or lack of same) coming out most of today's
manufacturers, but one generally can't fault the durability of the
guns.There are exceptions, of course, but in the aggregate
I suspect that your average GP-100 will last longer than the folks
of 1935 could even imagine.
Russian photographer Sergei Mikhailovich Prokudin-Gorskii made
quite a number of photographs prior to the communist revolution of
1918. What makes them unusual is that they are in vibrant
color!
Prokudin-Gorskii invented the technique to do this. What he did was
to shoot 3 nearly identical black-and-white negatives in rapid
succession - through narrow-band red, green and blue filters - then
show them on a screen through those same red, green, and blue
filters to produce color images. With today's digital techniques,
it is possible to assemble these images and view them easily.
During my photographic career, I experimented with his technique
with marginal success, but of course modern color films and papers
made this cumbersome process superfluous. At the time I was playing
with this, I did not know that Prokudin-Gorskii had invented it. It
was, after all, the tail end of the Cold War, and very little was
publicized about Russian technology. It wouldn't be until the fall
of the Berlin Wall, and the disintegration of the Iron Curtain,
that such things became known.
Today, the Library of Congress has one of the largest, and the
only digitally reproduced, portfolio of Prokudin-Gorskii's
groundbreaking work. Absolutely fascinating to view, and a "must
see" for history and technology buffs!
When we think of images of World War I, we think "black &
white." But color photography, though in its infancy and quite
expensive, did exist - and was used to capture images of the event
and environs.
This sitehas a
number of pictures taken by the French during the last two years of
"The Great War." Wonderful slices of history, and rarely
seen.
One of my favorites:
This picture show Swiss soldiers
standing guard at the border with France. Switzerland, as you know,
was neutral during the war; images of their soldiers during that
time period are a bit hard to find. To find one in color is a rare
treat. (If you look carefully, you can tell that the picture was
taken through the chicken wire that served to delineate the
borderline.)
I must say that it's a bit unnerving to look through these images,
and not because of gore or mayhem (there isn't any.)
Black-and-white pictures are an abstraction, which is why
photographers like to dabble in the medium. Color, on the other
hand, is "real" - it is a record, where black-and-white is an
interpretation. These pictures draw you in, and make the situations
being captured on film a bit less theoretical. They are almost
haunting...
Saturday, June 3,Montenegro declared independencefrom Serbia. Montenegro, along with
Serbia, had been a part of Yugoslavia since they joined the Balkan
union in 1918.
Just what does this have to do with revolvers? Well, there is a
revolver commonly known as a "Montenegrin revolver", and often said
to have been designed or made in Montenegro.
The trouble is that there isn't a shred of truth to those
tales!
The Montenegrin is more properly termed a Gasser, having originated
in the Austrian arms factories of Leopold Gasser. Gasser had
factories in Vienna and St. Polten. His guns were widely available
in the Balkans, and were in fact adopted by the Austro/Hungarian
army.
Why, then, did these 11mm revolvers get attributed to Montenegro?
There are two explanations: first, that their 11mm Long chambering
was originally issued to the Montenegrin army for a single shot
carbine. The second, more romantic and interesting, is that King
Nicholas of Montenegro had made the ownership of such arms
mandatory for his male citizenry. It was also said that the King
had a financial stake in their sale!
As interesting as the tale is, though, there seems to be no hard
evidence to support the King's supposed order. The name continues
to live on, even if we never know absolutely where it
originated.
Today, original Gasser revolvers fetch a pretty penny on the open
market. If looking at one, make sure it is marked from the Gasser
factory - there were any number of knock-offs made in workshops in
Austria and Belgium. Such arms are sometimes of questionable
manufacture and value, though are often labeled with the misleading
moniker of "Montenegrin revolver" by their over-enthusiastic (if
ill-informed) sellers.
Happy Independence Day, Montenegro!
-=[
Grant ]=-
|
Follow
me!
You're
reading... The Revolver Liberation
Alliance! The blog about revolvers,
training, self-defense, and shooting in general (along with an
occasional surprise!)