Couldn't come up with anything topical for today, so I thought I'd
talk about animals.
I now have a cat in the shop. My in-laws had a kitten they needed
to give away, and it ended up in the shop with me. I'm hoping the
little furball will eventually develop the skill to catch the mice
that inevitably come in from the adjacent wooded area. This would
be in stark contrast to our house cat, who runs screaming in terror
at the sight of anything resembling feline obligation.
Speaking of stupid animals, you may recall a post almost exactly a
year ago regarding our dog, who refused to sleep in his house. He
spent the last two years sleeping (through rain, wind, snow and
ice) simply curled up in front of our door. Miracle of miracles, he
started sleeping in the doghouse this week! I have no explanation
for his sudden change of heart, though he just celebrated his
second birthday - perhaps he's getting smarter as he ages.
He now lays in his doghouse and looks out at the rain with an
expression on his face that says "yup, I'm a smart dog! I sure am,
yup yup yup yup yup..."
I remain convinced that he is a stupid mutt. Which, as I think
about it, makes him eminently qualified to run for Congress.
Sadly, my dog's fleas aren't terribly talented, unlike the fleas
chronicled in Dark Roasted Blend'sentry on Victorian flea
circuses.
That, however, isn't the end of the story. In the aforementioned
article I learned of a blog devoted to flea circus research.No, I'm not
kidding.
There are some really odd blogs out there. As I always say, though,
“everyone needs a hobby!”
-=[
Grant ]=-
P.S.: It just occurred to me that there may be even odder blogs
floating around the intertubes. Post your strangest blog finds in
the comments. (No extremely profane sites oranythingdealing with sexual
fetishes. We want to see odd, not disgusting.)
It seems fitting that, since we started off with a musical number
set in inter-war Germany, that we see some money from that general
time. I'll leave you with the infamous 500 Million Mark note, which
by mid-1923 wasn't enough to buy a load of bread:
Today, you can buy one of those notes for less than $10.
It's a Hollywood staple: man and woman driving down road. Obviously
lost. Woman suggests man stop at gas station and ask directions.
Man refuses, insisting he knows exactly where they are. Hilarity or
tragedy ensues, depending on the theme of the movie/TV show.
Aircraft, as you may have heard, are vulnerable to missiles.
Whether launched from the ground or another aircraft, even a small
missile can easily down the largest plane. One of the few defenses
to an incoming missile is the dispensing of chaff (small metallic
particles/strips) and flares, both of which are intended to fool
the navigation systems that guide missiles to their prey.
What's odd is how pretty those countermeasures can be.
Even odder, this pic - along with many others - can be found at a
site calledEnvironmental Graffiti.
The siteEnglish Russiaentices me to
visit the former Soviet Union - the sheer number of abandoned
installations makes my head spin. Today the site beckons me with
two related stories about abandoned railways in the former
superpower.
First, a look at anever-operational line in northern
Siberia, apparently built at
Stalin's personal request. The reason for a railroad from nowhere
to nowhere remains a mystery, though in all fairness we do the same
thing with highways in Alaska.
The second is of alocomotive
depotin the same part of the
country, but these were all operational - until the USSR broke
apart. At some point, everyone just walked away...
My sister is an organist, and one of her ambitions is to someday
build a custom house - around a pipe organ. If you aren't familiar
with what that entails, let's just say it would need to be abighouse.
Pipe organs, even modest examples, arelarge instruments. As they increase in
complexity, though, they grow seemingly exponentially. A large
organ can have thousands - even tens of thousands - of precisely
tuned pipes that produce notes when fed with pressurized air. Just
the valving to make one of these behemoths work is mind-boggling in
complexity.
Even the part you can see - known as the console - can make a 747
look positively simple:
Main
console, Atlantic City Convention Hall organ, from
http://www.acchos.org
For more great pictures of pipe organs,check out this Dark Roasted Blend
story.
The LIFE website this week unveiled aphoto retrospective of Project
Mercury, America's first human
spaceflight program. If you look at the picture captions, you'll
notice one name on most of them: Ralph Morse. There's a good reason
for that.
Ralph Morse was a staffer at LIFE (and later TIME) when he was
assigned to cover a press conference in Washington in 1959. That
event was the announcement of the Project Mercury astronauts.
Sensing the long term importance of the announcement, Morse
contacted his editor and told him that there would be a lot of
public interest in these men. He suggested that the magazine assign
someone permanently to NASA, which was then less than a year old.
Morse got the job.
It was a good choice; Morse had already been with LIFE for over a
decade, bringing back some of the most well known pictures in their
archives. NASA was a fledgling agency, and Morse had gotten himself
in on the ground floor of what would become the Space Race.
Over the next couple of decades, Morse would become an insider at
NASA. He got exclusive access, and was even allowed to place his
cameras in restricted areas his competition at NEWSWEEK couldn't
even dream of. Along the way, he produced some of the most iconic
images of the various NASA projects.
It all started at that press conference, where an idiot reporter
(some things never change) asked the astronauts which of them
expected "to come back alive." Morse grabbed this shot of the
astronauts showing their mettle:
Some of his shots were very well known...
...while others weren't:
All of them, though, came fromthe camera of an inventive geniuswhose enthusiasm
for his job knew no bounds. Were it not for his eye, his ingenuity,
and his nose for news, we wouldn't have this great visual record of
our nation's greatest achievements. George Hunt, at one time LIFE's
Managing Editor, said “if LIFE could afford only one
photographer, it would have to be Ralph Morse.”
Ralph is now 92, but unfortunately for us gave up photography some
years ago.
If you ever get to attend a major shooting match, one thing that
will impress you is how accessible the top competitors are. If you
want to meet Rob Leatham or Jerry Miculek, no problem - they're
usually happy to shake hands and talk.
The same is true for the top jazz musicians. Jazz is a personal
music, and because of the smaller fan base getting to meet even the
biggest names is relatively easy. Imagine being able to walk up to
a well-known pop or rock artist and being able to do that. Unless
you're a buxom groupie with a purse full of cocaine, their security
staff isn't likely to let you get within a country mile of the
star! Jazz musicians aren't like that, and I've had the experiences
to prove it.
My interest in jazz matured in high school, which is also where my
first brush with fame occurred. I went to school with the brother
of Alan Yankee, who at the time was a saxophonist in theStan
KentonOrchestra. Kenton was my
idol, then and now, and meeting Alan was a highlight of my young
musical life. Little did I know that it was only the
beginning.
When I was attending college in Portland (Oregon) in the early
'80s, there were a bunch of jazz clubs in the city. Portland was
known as a jazz town, and major players would often make a stop on
their way between San Francisco and Seattle. We had not one but two
jazz radio stations (one commercial and one funded by a local
college), as well as an internationally regarded jazz festival.
Life was good for a jazz musician and lover of the genre.
By the turn of the century, the Festival had been reduced to a
weekend in one of the city parks, one of the radio stations was
gone and the other played more blues than jazz, and virtually all
of the jazz clubs were no more. I was lucky enough to meet quite a
few notable jazz musicians before jazz disappeared from
Portland.
Freddy
Hubbardplayed a single set at one
of the local clubs, to a packed house. Despite the cramped
surroundings, he made sure that he got around and shook people's
hands before jetting off to who-knows-where.
One of the high schools managed to snag the greatClark Terryfor a benefit concert. The
school was in a bad part of town, and the concert was not well
promoted. Still, I was surprised at the sparse crowd. For a city
with a jazz reputation, it was embarrassing. That didn't stop Clark
from putting on a great show, and I told him as much when we met
afterwards. "I"ve played bigger crowds, but that's not important -
I'm just happy that people appreciate my music." Clark is known as
a consummate gentleman, and his reputation is well deserved.
One summer a local college held a small jazz festival, and the
headliners were guitaristsHerb
Ellis and Barney Kessel. During a break between
acts, I went to use the facilities. Standing at the next urinal was
Herb himself, and we started talking. I normally wouldn't remember
a conversation from almost 30 years ago, but the surreal setting
burned this one into my mind: gardening. After finishing our
respective business, we went outside and sat at a bench, still
talking gardening. Nice guy, that Herb. (For those who think the
sun rises and sets on rock guitarists like Van Halen, check out the
link - Herb is the gray-haired gentleman. Perhaps you'll learn
something.)
TheWoody
Herman Big Band, one of the most popular in
the history of jazz, made a surprise visit to Portland one year. I
don't remember the details, but for some reason they unexpectedly
found themselves in town. Somehow they managed to find a venue at
one of the colleges, which had an open auditorium that day. Word
went out on the jazz radio stations that tickets were available for
that evening - dirt cheap, with all proceeds going to some charity.
The place was jammed, and the band was in top form. Later I got to
thank Woody for the unexpected treat, and expressed my appreciation
to number of the band members as well. One of them was Frank
Tiberi, who would later take over the organization after Woody's
death.
TrumpetersPete
and Conte Candoliappeared in Portland one
year, and of course I saw their show. At the time the Candolis were
at the top of their game; it was virtually impossible to find a big
band that hadn't had one (or both) in their trumpet section at one
time or another. I got to meet Conte, but Pete disappeared
somewhere after their set was over. The next day The Oregonian
newspaper had a review of the show. The writer, who apparently knew
nothing of jazz, lamented that when they soloed together they often
hit "clashing notes." I wrote a letter to the editor that said
something along the lines of "yeah, that happens with simultaneous
improvisation, you moron!" They didn't publish it, which wasn't a
surprise.
I remember taking my buddy and roommate, Ed, to see a
then-unknownDiane
Schuur. Between sets I introduced
myself and told her Ed was dying to meet her. She giggled and I
motioned Ed over; he was quite taken with her. That was
understandable, as she was a terrific singer and a wonderful
person. I hope she hasn't changed in the intervening 25-odd years ;
she certainly still sings well.
Of course, there has to be the exception that proves the rule, and
in jazz that wasMaynard
Ferguson. I found him to be the
single rudest person I'd ever met in music. That attitude had
rubbed off on some of his band members, as the rest of his trumpet
section was as obnoxious as he was. (His sax players, who
apparently didn't get as much attention, were nicer. I almost felt
sorry for them.) I originally chalked the snub up to his having a
bad day, but have heard from many people since who tell me that it
was SOP with him.
If memory serves it was the second Mount Hood Festival Of Jazz that
featured an appearance by a young and highly toutedWynton
Marsalis. I ended up
(unintentionally) running into him around the venue, and though he
was polite enough, I frankly didn't find much in his music to be
impressed with. I haven't heard anything from him since which
changes that impression. My contrarian opinion hasn't seemed to
hurt his record sales, though, and I hope he doesn't hold it
against me!
My favorite trumpet player is the late, greatRed
Rodney. In the early '80s he had a
quintet with the phenomenal Ira Sullivan, a group which to this day
gets my vote as the most overlooked in jazz. They showed up in
Portland once, and my buddy Bob and I were there front row, center.
Between sets Red ambled over and introduced himself, and asked if I
was a trumpet player. Confused, I asked him how he knew; he said
that I was the only one in the audience who "got" what he was
playing. I never did quite understand what he meant, but he sat
down at our table to chat and eat his dinner. It remains my
favorite jazz experience, and on that note I'll leave you with this
video of Red at his best.
Kodachrome
They give us those nice bright colors
They give us the greens of summers
Makes you think all the world's a sunny day, Oh yeah
I got a Nikon camera
I love to take a photograph
So mama don't take my Kodachrome away
Kodachrome wasn't the first time the company had influenced musical
history, however. It's true that Kodachrome was invented by a
couple ofamateur chemistswho were alsoprofessional musicians, but the influence I'm
thinking of goes far deeper.
As it happens George Eastman, the founder of Eastman Kodak, was an
aspiring flutist and music fanatic. His love of making and
listening to music led him to found theEastman School of Music, cementing his place in
American music history.
Now you're probably thinking "Eastman School of Music? Never heard
of it!" Most people, when asked to name a prestigious music school,
immediately think "Juilliard." While Juilliard is a fine school and
better known to the general public, those with a deep knowledge of
musical education will often quietly refer you to Eastman. Since
1921, Eastman graduates have enjoyed a solid reputation for being
"musician's musicians", which persists to this day - it is often
ranked as the top music school in the country in major media
surveys.
George Eastman was a remarkable
individualwho also gave major grants
to engineering and technical schools such as MIT, and involved
himself in a range of social and business innovations. It could be
argued, though, that giving the world both Kodachrome andFrederick Fennellwould have been enough for
any one person.
In 1997, NASA launched the Cassini spacecraft to study the planet
Saturn. It finally reached the ringed planet in 2004, and started
sending back some positively amazing images. The craft continues to
work perfectly, and as a result the mission has been extended to
2010.
Many people have heard of theMaginot
line,
a series of fortifications designed to protect France from invasion
by Germany. As you may have heard, it didn't work all that well -
the Germans simply went around it, through Belgium and the
Netherlands, and right into Paris for coffee and gloating.
You may not have heard of theMannerheim line. It was Finland's
fortification intended to protect it from Russian aggression.
During the Winter War (where the Soviets sustained losses heavy
enough to make them wish they'd never set their sights on Helsinki)
the Mannerheim sustained heavy damage. Unlike the Maginot line, the
Mannerheim was very lightly constructed and took the full force of
the Russian advance. The majority of the installations were
destroyed, leaving little behind but memories.
During the 1930s and 1940s, the Farm Security Administration (FSA)
and the Office of War Information (OWI) shot tens of thousands of
photographs. The vast majority - and the images we most associate
with their work - were in black and white:
However, there were a number of assignments which were shot in
color. That number was far smaller, likely because of budget
constraints, but produced some stunning images:
Way back in the mid-70s I was a geeky high school student whose
career dreams were split between playing trumpet in the Stan Kenton
band, or designing optical systems for spy satellites. Kenton died
in 1979, which quashed my first ambition, and a dismal showing in
differential calculus (don't ask) convinced me that engineering
wasn't my forte, either.
(What happened between then and now is a long story...)
Anyhow, back to high school. Our science teacher was an ex-JPL
scientist who'd taken early retirement and ended up in our small
Oregon town. This was a major score for a backward mountain
community, and he was a wealth of information. I took every
advanced physics and chemistry course our little school
offered.
One day, he presented to the class what was then a very recent
scientific find: the existence of a natural nuclear fission
reactor. That's right, a nuclear reactor where atoms were split
without human design or interference, and long before humans walked
the earth. At the time, despite learning all the details, I found
it hard to believe that such a thing had happened. I understood
that it was theoretically possible, but it seemed fantastic that
just the right physical conditions necessary to sustain natural
fission had occurred anywhere.
In 1936, an audacious Henry Luce changed the way we looked at the
world. He took a staid publication, gave it a new,
photojournalistic makeover, and created the legendary LIFE
Magazine.
Luce hired the best photographers he could find, and sent them out
to cover whatever was interesting - if not always the biggest
story. LIFE became the must-read periodical for the next several
decades, owing to a combination of superior illustration and good
writing. People of my generation, and those of the previous one,
can easily remember at least one great LIFE photo - if not a whole
bunch. That's what LIFE was about, and it is not too great a
stretch to say that LIFE defined American photojournalism.
Many of LIFE's photographers would become well-known, like Margaret
Bourke-White...
Alfred Eisenstadt...
Gordon Parks...
Ralph Morse...
Robert Capa...
Joen Loengard...
Co Rentmeester...
...as well as many more whose names weren't as familiar, but were
stupendous "shooters" in their own right. LIFE was THE gig to have,
and it attracted (and got) the best talent.
Now, in the digital era,Google and TIME have teamed up to bring the entire
LIFE photo archive to the web. The hundreds of thousands
of images in the LIFE vault are being digitized and indexed by
Google as fast as their scanners will scan. At this moment, only
about 20% of the collection has been archived - but more photos are
added every day, and they hope to be finished with the project in
mere months.
The collection includes everything - photos that have been
published, and those that haven't. You'll get to see images that
didn't make the "cut", those that weren't good enough to be
published, as well as those iconic images for which LIFE was so
well known.
Nope. This is the Middle East. Yes, it is! It's the beautiful
country of Lebanon.
Hard to believe? What's hard to believe is that people go to Dubai
instead of Baalbeck!
I have good friends who are from Lebanon; from them I've learned a
great deal about the country, the people, and the history. Lebanon
is truly the jewel of the Middle East, with a beautiful coastline,
verdant valleys, and ski resorts. (Yes. Skiing. In the Middle East.
With real snow on real mountains, unlike the artificial stuff that
attracts crowds in Dubai.)
Why, you may ask, is Lebanon known for war and strife instead of
scenery and recreation? The answer would take pages upon pages of
explanation; let's just say that when a healthy national pride is
replaced with violent sectarianism you get hell instead of
paradise. The Lebanon of the late 20th century (and, it appears,
the 21st as well) was closer to the former than the latter, which
tends to explain why the mention of the country brings to mind
bombed-out Beirut instead of the gorgeous Bekaa Valley.
I've
previously mentionedmy appreciation for the work
that NASA has done over it's 50-year history. NASA grew up right
along with me - or me with it - and NASA was always doing the
exciting stuff boys of that era were smitten by: Astronauts. Fast
planes. Rockets. The Moon.
(It wasn't just spectacle, though; NASA was the catalyst for
technological progress that continues to be felt today. A
surprising number of the things we now take for granted can be
traced directly back to some NASA project.)
We learned about the exploits of the engineers, technicians and
astronauts through NASA-supplied pictures in the magazines of the
day. My early interest in science was kindled by those pictures,
and some of them I still remember.
NASA documented everything, but not all of their photos were of
general interest. A large percentage of their images were never
seen by the general public because the media was understandably
reluctant to publish anything of interest only to nerds. Through
the magic of the internet, however, we now have ready access to
some of those great pictures.
The agency has launched anew site just for NASA
images. You can search or browse
and download your selected pictures, drawings, and illustrations -
some of them of quite high resolution. You'll find lots of
astronomical images, of course, but you'll find all kinds of other
things too.
Two of my favorites from the 1969 launch of Apollo 11, taking the
first men to the moon:
Saturn V rocket
FTW!
If you're a science buff like me, you can spend large amounts of
time on their site. I recommend that you not try this a) at work,
or b) when your significant other expects you to be paying
attention to him/her/the kids/household chores/your dinner guests.
You have been warned!
Portland, Oregon has for years had one of the highest numbers of
movie theater seats per capita. Oregonians, it would appear, can't
get enough of the silver screen. (Save for this Oregonian, who sees
one theater movie every five years or so whether he needs to or
not.)
It seems to have always been this way. Portland had a large number
of neighborhood movie theaters up through the '60s, and many of
those buildings are still standing. The theaters were converted to
other uses, and some of them actually retained some of their former
features. Finding and exploring those old locations is a hobby for
some, an obsession for others.
Back in the early '80s, when I was doing some moonlighting as a
commercial photographer, I was retained by an older gentleman to
photograph the abandoned Egyptian Theater in northeast Portland.
The theater, originally built as a vaudeville venue, had been
converted to the newfangled "moving pitchers" in the early '30s. It
operated until 1962, when it was closed and used as overflow
warehousing space for the chemical company which had purchased the
location.
The gentleman who hired me was a serious movie buff, and was
writing a book on old Oregon theaters. He wanted me to shoot
pictures of the interior of the Egyptian. (I got the job because i
was the only photographer he found who could light an entire large
interior without benefit of electrical outlets or a generator. The
power in the building had been shut off for years, the wiring
having been declared a fire hazard. I'll leave you to guess how I
pulled it off.)
Once in the building we found many of the seats still in place; the
entire balcony was intact, as were the Egyptian-motif decorations
and appointments throughout. There were torn ticket stubs littering
the floor and even remnants of coming attraction posters in the
lobby.
When theater closed, the awning (shown in this 1933 photo) was
removed, and the front of the building simply covered with a false
wall. The ticket booth and original doors were still there!
It was a surreal experience, as if the building was simply waiting
for the janitors to arrive to clean up for that evening's
business.
The building was torn down in 1989; sadly, the book never
materialized. I had a good time, though.
What brought this to mind wasthis article at WebUrbanist about abandoned movie
theatersacross the U.S. (Somewhere
in storage I have my shots of the Egyptian, but exactly where is a
mystery. Until I can find them, you'll have to make do with
WebUrbanist's article!)
If you're under 40, the nameDouglas Engelbartprobably means nothing to
you. It should, though, because a huge amount of the machine on
which you're reading this sprang from his fertile mind.
Engelbart (yet another product of Oregon, having been born in
Portland) worked at Stanford Research Institute (SRI) before the
dawn of the personal computer revolution. Many of the things we now
use without a second thought were developed by him, or made
possible by his work: bitmapped screens, the graphical user
interface (GUI), hypertext, and networking. The very birth of the
internet occurred when his lab at SRI and it's counterpart at UCLA
networked their computers to become the first two nodes ofARPANET.
His greatest moment would have to be his "Mother of All Demos" in 1968. In that
presentation, he introduced to a stunned world the early working
implementations of video conferencing, teleconferencing,
interactive text, email and the aforementioned hypertext. It is,
perhaps, the single most important event in the history of modern
computing.
One of his inventions revealed for the first time at the Demo was a
new invention: the computer mouse. It would take over a decade
before his now-common pointing device finally reached the market
(attached to the ill-fated Xerox 8010 Star Information System), and
several years after that before it came to the notice of the
general public (as an integral part of the original
Macintosh.)
(John C. Dvorak, computer pundit, wrote in 1984 of the new Mac and
Engelbart's invention : "The Macintosh uses an experimental
pointing device called a 'mouse'. There is no evidence that people
want to use these things." Dvorak is not known for his prescience,
which surprisingly fails to deter his continued employment.)
When I was a wee lad, America was at the forefront of space
exploration. By the time I was old enough to know what was going
on, we'd recovered from the shock of the Soviets beating us into
space, and had responded in a big way with Gemini and Apollo
programs.
In those days, our grade school classes would literally come to a
halt as we gathered around a television set to watch a liftoff or a
splashdown. The mighty Saturn V rockets - spewing a fireball that
remains unequalled for sheer excitement - would take our astronauts
into space for yet another thrilling mission. Landing men on the
moon was our crowning achievement, watched by just about everyone
in the country.
Space flights were national events on a scale that I haven't seen
since - and probably never will again. The SuperBowl and American
Idol Finals may draw larger audiences, but in terms of captivating
our collective conscious, of instilling pride in our country and
what we were capable of doing, they will ever equal the NASA of the
mid 20th century.
Owing to my unnatural fascination with old and abandoned things, I
find the concept of an aircraft boneyard to be absolutely
irresistible. The most famous of them is no doubt theAerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Centeroutside of
Tucson, butthere are
others.
The Russianshave such
things, too, and they can be a
fascinating glimpse into the "other side" of the Cold War.
Before Honda, before Kawasaki, Yamaha or Suzuki, motorcycle racing
was dominated by the great Italian marques. Legendary companies
like Gilera, Moto Morini, and MV Augusta held consecutive world
titles, some of which would stand for years. All of these makers
had their adherents, but the undeniable "big boy" of Italian
motorcycle racing was Moto Guzzi.
The company was formed when three friends - Carlo Guzzi, Girogio
Parodi, and Giovanni Ravelli - were serving in the Italian Army
during World War I. Part of a flying unit, they had complimentary
skills: Guzzi was a talented, though as yet amateur, engineer;
Ravelli was an up-and-coming name in racing before the war; and
Parodi, like his successful father, had demonstrated business
acumen. The three agreed to pool their talents and form a company
to make motorcycles. Ravelli, sadly, was killed only days after the
war was finished, but Guzzi and Parodi soldiered on to form the
company they'd all dreamed about.
Guzzi designed the machines and Parodi (whose father financed the
enterprise) handled the business aspects of the fledgling firm.
They knew that the key to commercial success was a reputation in
racing, and thanks to their combined skill they were almost
immediately successful at both. Only four months after their first
prototypes were completed, company rider Gino Finzi picked up first
place at the prestigious Targa Florio - a win that surprised the
industry.
The company rapidly expanded their pool of engineering talent, and
they would flex their muscle by making amazing motorcycles: a
magnesium-cased, supercharged 250cc; a 4-cylinder supercharged
500cc in 1930; and a 3-cylinder supercharged 500cc machine in 1940.
Despite these advances, their racing reputation would be made with
their more pedestrian - but wonderfully engineered - single
cylinder twin-cam motorcycles.
Those bikes quickly came to dominate the 250cc and 500cc classes,
racking up win after win. In 1934 they cemented their hold on the
top 500cc class with their introduction of the two-cylinder
500ccbicilindrica,
which allowed them a spectacular win in both the 250cc and 500cc
classes at the Isle of Man TT race in 1935. in 1953 they entered
the hotly contested 350cc class, again with a twin-cam single, and
won every World Championship until 1957.
By the mid-50s, though, they were losing ground in the "top dog"
500cc class. The twin-cam singles were decidedly out of date, while
thebicilindricahad been
inexplicably killed off in 1951. Guzzi needed a new bike that could
not just take on the increasingly successful Gilera and upstart MV
Augusta designs, but would rule over them.
Chief designer Giulio Carcano put his considerable talent to work,
and what emerged in 1955 stunned the world: a water cooled, 500cc
V-8 motorcycle. With dual overhead cams and a separate carburetor
for each cylinder, this audacious design pumped out a
then-unheard-of 72hp at a scarcely believable 12,000 rpm. Guzzi was
ready.
Sadly the tire, brake and suspension technology of the day weren't
up to the demands of the magnificent engine, and theotto
cylindrinever achieved the success
intended. Moto Guzzi retired from racing entirely at the end of the
1957 season, and the bike was shelved. This didn't stop it from
leaving a stumbling block for its rivals, though - in its short
2-season career it set several lap speed records which would end up
standing for more than two decades, a parting shot to those who
would succeed them.
Today only two authentic examples remain, both in the possession of
the Guzzi company in the picturesque Italian town of Mandello del
Lario. They occasionally fire one up for a demonstration run on
their test track behind the factory. The sound of the engine is
unmistakable, and reminds us that there was a time when Italy did,
in fact, rule the world - or at least a small part of it.
You know, I had a pretty darned
good childhood. I grew up on a small farm, outside a small town (I
remember when the town passed the 1500 resident milestone) that was
nestled in the foothills of the Cascade Range.
After chores were finished and if there were no other pressing jobs
to be done (like hauling hay), I got to do what I wanted. I could
go down to our pond and fish, or take off with my friends Dan
and/or Tom for an overnight camping trip - all with very little
administrative (parental) hand-wringing. Even a two-day trip up the
river and into the woods wasn't out of the question, though such an
outing did prompt some worrying from my mother.
Not a bad way to grow up!
Living as I do in suburbia, I long for the time when we would run
into the forest with little more than a small tent, a blanket, a
sheath knife, maybe a couple cans of baked beans, and a fishing
pole. (If we planned our trip into a particular area that we knew
contained several small caves, we didn't even bother with the
tent.) Woodcraft, such as shelter building and fire making, was an
expected part of any well-balanced upbringing. I miss those
days.
I have found a way to keep the hunger for simpler times at bay: I
curl up with Nessmuk.
What is a Nessmuk? Properly, the question is phrased "Who is
Nessmuk?"
Nessmuk was in normal existence one George Washington Sears. Sears
was a slight, asthmatic individual who was born in 1821 in
Massachusetts, and spent much of his life - at least, that portion
when he wasn't working just to finance his next adventure - in a
canoe or on a boat or in the woods.
He was able to combine his love of the outdoors and his
considerable talent as a writer by having narratives of his
adventures published inForest and Streammagazine.
He wrote two books,WoodcraftandCamping,
which are still in print - combined into one volume titledWoodcraft and
Camping(no surprise there, right?!?) It
is still available to this day, which must be some sort of record
in the publishing business. (Another book, calledAdirondack
Letters,
is a compilation of his articles in Forest and Stream.)
Woodcraft and
Campingis
not a thick book, nor is it solely a "how to" manual. It is the
collected wisdom and insights of a man who lived just to be able to
commune with nature. Nessmuk wrote in a beautiful, lyrical style
that makes the reader salivate with the desire to get out into the
wilderness.
At only $6.95, I believe it to be one of the greatest bargains - as
well as one of the "must haves" - in outdoor literature. I cannot
recommend this book highly enough to anyone who enjoys living in
and exploring the wilderness, or even just dreaming about it!
That was my dear, departed
father's question whenever I was found to have done something that
wasn't all that bright. Of course, any self-respecting 10-year-old
knows how to answer: look at the ground, shuffle your feet, and say
(sotto
voce) "I
dunno."
Unfortunately, once you become of age and start asking yourself the
same question that tried-and-true answer know longer works. As luck
would have it, sometimes it takes a while before you ask.
Sometimes, it takes years. The great part about this delay is that
it allows you to once again say "I dunno!"
This is a story about just such an event.
Here in Oregon we're blessed with some phenomenal scenery. From our
gorgeous Pacific Coastline to the high desert east of the Cascades
(a treasure unto themselves), there is something here for every
taste. One of the most visited natural wonders is Multnomah Falls,
located just a short 45-minute drive from downtown Portland.
The spectacular waterfall - the second-highest year-round fall in
North America - is fed by a spring way up on Larch Mountain. In
fact, it's not the only falls served by that spring: there are
several other (much smaller, of course) falls that the water
travels over before reaching the "big one."
(From the U.S. Forest Service
website.)
Multnomah Falls is 620 feet high - a straight drop of 542 feet,
then a bit of a pool, then another drop of a mere 69 feet. A
footbridge spans the small canyon over the top of the smaller
section, and leads to a trail which snakes its way up the side of
the mountain to a viewpoint at the top. There, safely contained
behind fences and guardrails, one can look over the incredibly
scenic Columbia River Gorge.
However, back in 1982 there were no such amenities at the top -
just a small sign that warned visitors (those hardy enough to make
the steep climb) to stay on the trail. That didn't stop my buddy Ed
and me from doing something stupid, however!
A quick digression: Ed and I were aspiring photographers who spent
our days selling Nikons and other assorted high end gear to people
who also aspired to be photographers. Most of them, however, would
never put themselves on the line for "that shot"; we, on the other
hand, continually stick our various body parts in harm's way just
to get pictures that no one else would dare.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how we found ourselves in the
middle of that cold little river at the edge of Multnomah
Falls!
I decided that I wanted a different shot of the falls - one that no
one else would take. So we lugged our 35 pounds of gear (per
person, you understand) up the trail and sloshed out into the
water.
I walked to the edge of the falls, where I found a couple of rocks
between which I could wedge my Pentax KX-Motor camera on its Bogen
Monopod and shoot at a low enough shutter speed to capture the
movement of the water. I framed the scene to show the water going
over the edge on its way to the bottom (542 feet below my, umm,
feet) as well as a glimpse of the river and gorge, and made 3
exposures.
Once I developed the film, into my archives the negatives went - to
be resurrected here for the first time in a quarter century:
Looking at this shot today sends chills down my spine. It was
foolhardy in the extreme; I was literally leaning out over the edge
of the falls to take the picture, knee-deep in cold water, just a
slip away from certain death. I was either invincible or ignorant -
I'll leave it to you to determine which.
It shouldn't surprise you to learn that this wasn't the first - nor
was it the last - stupid thing we did in the name of photographic
immortality. My wife, one would think, would be used to this sort
of thing - yet when I told her the story (several years later), she
asked "what the hell were you thinking?!?" Need I tell you my
answer?
You're
reading... The Revolver Liberation
Alliance! The blog about revolvers,
training, self-defense, and shooting in general (along with an
occasional surprise!)