Friday, December 30, 2011
Tomorrow night we'll be celebrating the arrival of the New Year and
looking back at what 2011 has wrought. I, for one, am glad that
2011 is almost behind us (and on Monday you'll discover one of the
reasons why!)
I look forward to 2012 with both elation and trepidation. This next
year will bring a presidential election that is already shaping up
to be one of the most hideous of recent memory, in the midst of a
fragile economy and growing discontent amongst the citizenry. The
threat of violence on a large scale has never been as high as it is
right now, and giving some attention to your own personal
protection plans would be a prudent resolution to make this
weekend.
On a more optimistic note, there are a lot of really neat things in
the works for 2012! I hope to kick the new year off by breaking
some big news in January, and if the rumors I'm hearing are true
the upcoming SHOT Show may hold some great things for revolver
enthusiasts.
In the next couple of months I’ll be adding a new lever
action class to my course offerings, as well as a few other
surprises - including videos!
Enjoy your weekend, celebrate safely and sanely, and check back in
on Monday for a raucous and somewhat tongue-in-cheek blog entry -
one sure to get some people's blood pressure up!
-=[
Grant ]=-
Monday, November 28, 2011
I hope everyone had a good Thanksgiving weekend - ours was filled
with windstorm destruction and a blown head gasket on my primary
vehicle. My spare time for the next couple of weeks will be filled
with hauling debris and fixing an engine. Why can't these things
happen in summer, when it's nice to be outside working?
---
Thanksgiving weekend seems these days to be filled more with
thoughts of football than of peaceful coexistence with one's fellow
man. Here in Oregon we had our annual Civil War Game - Oregon State
University versus University of Oregon, the prize being the
opportunity to play in another game of some sort. (No, I don't
follow college football - does it show?) I personally find it
rather sad that folks can tell you who's playing, why they're
playing, who the head coaches are, and even the names of a couple
of ousted coaches from a college clear back in Pennsylvania - but
can't name five of the top physics programs in the country.
(Just for the record, this is not age-related curmudgeonliness - as
my siblings will gleefully tell you, I had precisely the same
opinion as a kid.)
---
Someone (could have been Tam, but I’m not
absolutely positive) recently turned me on to a cool gun
blog: Forgotten
Weapons. Lots of great stuff about
guns you may not even know existed, presented with a decidedly
scholarly bent. Immediately became one of the few in my daily RSS
feed.
---
A couple of days ago I found out that my new book, The
Gun Digest Book of the
Revolver, is being sold in the U.K.
by Amazon. As of this morning the folks across the pond only had
two copies left, which sounds as though it's a big seller over
there. Then again, they may have only ordered three copies total -
this realization serving to keep my ego in check!
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: old.technology, bloggers,
books,
book.of.the.revolver
Wednesday, July 06, 2011
Haven't come up with anything to say. Luckily Chris Byrne has, and I agree with his
take.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: bloggers
Monday, May 23, 2011
Back
on track - I hope: My apologies for not getting
a post up on Friday. Thursday evening our dog fell ill and the very
first thing Friday morning I made the half-hour drive to the vet,
dog in tow. They put him under the knife shortly after arrival, and
I made it back home with him in the late afternoon. We're still
awaiting the results of a biopsy but at this point things are
looking pretty good. Amazing how much of a scare a sick dog can be.
(He now weighs in at 96 lbs. No wonder I can’t easily pick
him up any more.)
Maybe
not quite: This weekend I was working
on a number of projects around the place. I've got three retaining
walls to build this summer as well as lots of general land clearing
to do (a perennial task here in the rainforest.) As I was hooking a
brush cutter up to the tractor to work on the latter I managed to
smash the middle finger of my right hand between a drag link and
the tractor. This morning it's still quite painful, especially when
typing. (When you're as bad a typist as I am you need every finger
you've got!)
This
just in: As I was preparing to upload
this post an email from Ed Harris alerted me to a company
selling free
range squirrel in a can. Certainly less messy than
doing it the old way, but less fun as well. (Don't think of them as
cute - think of them as delicious!)
Happy Monday.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
I'm not going to blog a whole lot today, mainly because I'm busy
trying to get a couple of tricky jobs out the door this week. There
is something on the horizon about which I'm somewhat excited; more
as it develops, but if it turns out as I hope I think a lot of you
will be excited, too.
Now for that favor: do you know someone who is high up the food
chain at Qwest Communications? I've got an issue with our DSL
service at the house and have gotten several conflicting stories
from their customer disservice folks. This morning I was greeted
with a rather rude call from one of their people who grudgingly
issued a rebate on my bill while simultaneously challenging me to
go find someone else. Of course, he knows full well that there is
no one else out here in the sticks. (There's always satellite, but
from the people I've talked with it's hardly an alternative.)
I'd love to talk with someone who a) is in a position to give me a
real answer, b) isn't a jerk, and c) might be able to actually
cause the problem to be solved. I’ve been a reasonably happy
Qwest customer up to this point, and I’m surprised
they’d so easily write off a good customer in these sketchy
economic times.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Monday, May 02, 2011
Too much to do, not enough time to do it. Maybe later.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Monday, April 18, 2011
You may have noticed that there was no Friday Surprise last week.
In fact, it wasn't until yesterday that I noticed there was no
Friday Surprise! Apparently I simply lost track of what day it was,
one of the risks of working by and for oneself.
---
I need your help. I'm looking to scope a few old .22 rifles, and
would like to find some vintage scopes to do so. What I'm looking
for are the Weaver Model A4 (4x power, 3/4" tube) or the '60s
vintage Bushnell Custom jobs with the integral full-length
dovetails (also 4x magnification.) Yes, I've tried the usual places
(eBay, etc.) and for such a common item they just don't show up
very often. They're not exactly high dollar attractions, and I
suspect that's the reason no one bothers to list them on the
auction sites -- not enough return on investment.
Should you happen to possess one of these, and should its optics be
in excellent condition, and should you wish to part with it, drop
me an email.
--
Speaking of .22 rifles: there are tons of inexpensive autoloading
.22s in the marketplace, and if they're not Ruger 10/22s no one
seems to take much notice. I've talked to more than one person who
bought a Mossberg or Savage or Marlin .22 auto at a gunshow and
sold it off immediately because it "didn't work right." They
usually end up going to Wally World (or the local equivalent) and
getting a 10/22 on sale, secure in the knowledge that the Ruger
will work where those "cheap guns" wouldn't.
I've salvaged several of those gun show rejects, and with only one
exception (where I had to replace an extractor) they were returned
to proper function simply by cleaning the bolt. A .22 rifle is a
dirty beast, and over decades of shooting the extractor and firing
pin channels become caked with goo (a technical term used by
gunsmiths.) By pulling the bolt from the gun and getting rid of
that sandy, greasy mess you can solve 90% of functioning
problems.
Cheap .22 rifles are to be celebrated, not feared. They're easy to
fix and loads of fun, even if you can't buy carbon fiber geegaws
for them.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: rimfire, maintenance, autoloaders, vintage
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Regarding organization, I'm like the guy with his feet in a bucket
of ice and his hair is on fire: "on average, I'm comfortable." On
average, I'm organized.
My organization goes in streaks. I'll get the urge to clean,
arrange, and organize my workspace, and once done it slowly - over
a period of time - degrades once more into chaos. At some point the
organization mania comes back, I fix everything up, and the process
repeats itself. The cycle takes months.
I'm in the organization part of that cycle, and it hit yesterday
afternoon: I finally got tired of digging my way across the shop to
find the lathe ("I know it's here somewhere.") I started by
clearing some of the workbenches of their layers of stuff: at the
bottom of one pile were some new FedEx boxes I'd gotten from their
depot perhaps five - maybe six, who knows - months ago.
I spent the remainder of the afternoon inventorying bags of
commonly used parts that had simply been dumped in a bin on
arrival. (If I need a spring, for instance, I go to the organized
parts drawers to see if I have one. If not, I paw through the
incoming parts bin. I always find what I’m looking for, but
the routine chews up precious time. And it’s annoying.)
The great part is that once I'm finished the shop will seem newly
spacious. There are times I think I need to move to a bigger
location, then I clean everything up and I find space I didn't even
know I had! That's the payoff, but unfortunately it never lasts.
Sooner or later the clutter returns, and I'm back to scouting new
digs. Won't I ever learn?
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to find the broom and dustpan. I
think I saw them over by the lathe...
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: dammit
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Sorry for not having a post on Monday. If you tried to check in,
you probably found that the site was down. My hosting company,
Dreamhost, experienced a system-wide outage on Monday which took
down all of their client sites as well as their own. My site came
back up, sporadically, sometime Monday afternoon. It wasn't until
Tuesday night, however, that I could actually get access to upload
anything. Everything seems to be back to normal (knock on
wood.)
First things first: On Monday I taped an interview with Doc Wesson
for the Gun Nation
Podcast. He'll be playing it
tonight on a LIVE streaming podcast episode he's calling "The Wheel
Of Love". It starts at 9:pm EDT, and you can listen live at this
link. He'll even be taking
call-ins (which gives me an idea...)
Yesterday Breda over at The Breda Fallacy posted a little
rant about lightweight snubnose
revolvers for women. Tam picked it up this
morning. I read both and agreed
with pretty much everything they said, but I had this odd feeling
I'd read it all before. Oh, now I remember! That's because I've
written the same thing. More than once. More than twice. Great minds? Well, I don't
know that I can claim to have one, but they certainly do. (If you
listen to the Gun Nation podcast tonight, you'll probably hear me
tell Doc that the snubnose revolver is an 'expert's weapon', not
something for a beginner.)
In a previous life I dealt with police reports on a fairly regular
basis, and I was always amused at the language and syntax in the
writing. One Deputy, who was forever on 'the outs' with his
supervisors for not playing the game, was once reprimanded for
using the phrase "I watched him...” instead of the more
official-sounding "I observed as the suspect..." This memory came
back when I read a Miami Herald article about a Florida Highway
Patrol firearms instructor who was shot in the derriere by her
supervisor. The official report was that the supervisor was
'inspecting' the weapon, which is apparently FHP-speak for
"screwing around with". Were I in charge I'd be sorely tempted to
allow Trooper Mellow Scheetz ('Mellow'? Seriously?) a penalty kick
at her supervisor's privates, just to bring home the lesson, then
do some remedial safety training that doesn’t allow for
the “but I thought it was unloaded!” defense.
That's it for today. Be sure to check out the podcast this
evening!
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: women, safety, bloggers
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Over the next week or so I'm going to be deleting some of the older
posts here. Don't worry, nothing important is getting dumped, but I
am getting ride of the superfluous stuff: a lot of the Friday
Surprises, news announcements that are no longer news, and that
sort of rot.
The reason? The blog files are taking up far too much space on the
server (hey, this costs money!) It's also taking longer to upload
each new post, as the server doesn't calculate things like the tag
cloud on the fly; it's generated as the files are uploaded. This
means that each day's upload gets slower than the last, and I'm
impatient!
The plan is to do the housekeeping on a rotating basis, so that at
least the last six months are maintained in their entirety. After
that, the less useful or noteworthy stuff will go into the
bit
bucket.
-=[ Grant ]=-
Monday, January 10, 2011
- I wrote a few weeks back about a new
feline inhabiting my workplace.
Some disagreement exists regarding the name of said feline - I
think "ShopKat" is perfect, my wife prefers "Cali" - but the little
furball is already doing good work. Mice infiltration is down, and
she's managed to snag one or two rodentia herself. This is in stark
contrast to the lazy cat at home, who spends all of his productive
time curled up in front of the woodstove.
- Several people have asked if I managed to find a line of
shirts
I like. So far readers have
suggested two good candidates: the Overland long sleeve from Triple Aught Design
($$$ but made in the U.S.), and the Safari Shirt from Long Grass (made in
South Africa, but not so much $$$.) I’ve not actually ordered
either yet, but I'll get around to trying them in the next month or
so. Thanks for all the suggestions!
- My wife came home with a big surprise recently:
Sparky's Root
Beer, elixir of the deities, is
once again available in Oregon. I can't tell you how happy and
excited I was to find that I now have semi-regular access to my
absolute favorite brew! I say semi-regular, as it's only carried by
the local speciality food retailer, but the fact that I can get it
at all is cause for celebration. My fellow Oregonians, gettest thou
to your local Market Of
Choice and try Sparky's for
thyself!
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: sources, root.beer
Monday, January 03, 2011
Welcome to 2011! I hope everyone had a happy and safe New Year's
celebration.
Whether you're just tuning in, or you've been here for a while, I
think it's worth pointing out the three things that make my blog
different from every other in the firearms/self defense
field.
First, I long ago made the commitment to writing a large percentage
of original content. That is, things that I wrote myself, as
opposed to taking from others. My goal was (and still is) to
provide information to my readers that they may not find anywhere
else. Many bloggers simply link to other's work, perhaps adding a
few comments of their own along the way. Don't get me wrong -
sometimes that commentary is insightful and adds to the enjoyment
of the material. It's just not what I want to provide to my
readers.
I want my readers to come away informed. Sometimes I'm forced to
resort to linking to other's original work, namely because I don't
have time to write lots of original content each week, but my goal
is to have at least half of what you read be mine alone. I think
over the past few years I've done a little better than that.
Second, I'm not attempting to monetize this blog. Monetization is
the act of leveraging ones readers to generate income, and it's the
big thing these days. There have been books, DVDs, websites,
podcasts, and - yes! - blogs devoted to earning big money by
blogging. Supposedly the way one does this is to write lots of
short posts linking to other's work (bringing us back to that whole
original content thing), which in turn attracts readers to the blog
- the end game being to derive ad revenue from their visits.
That's just not 'me'. You'll notice that there aren't any Google
ads, pop-ups, or resource-hogging Flash animations here. That's
because I'm not trying to fund this blog; it rides for free on the
website to which it's attached. The website carries the expense,
leaving me free to deliver original, informative content in a way
that doesn't try to extract money from my readers. Someone who just
wants to read my scribblings can do so in peace and without ever
venturing into the rest of my site.
Finally, I don't "hit whore". Hit whoring is the practice of
writing something about a currently popular topic that raises the
passions of the reader and virtually dares him/her to visit and
respond. Entries sprinkled with phrases and keywords calculated to
appeal to search engines also come under this classification. This
is a very popular technique to use when monetizing a blog: one
simply links to someone else's content, adds a few lines of
emotional appeal to one side or the other, formats it in such a way
as to mimic the likely terms someone might Google, and presto - the
hits are a'comin!
For instance: this year you're going to see a lot of hit whoring
related to the centennial celebration of a certain autoloading
pistol invented by a certain gun designer who lived in a certain
western state known for having a large population of a certain
religious group. If I were hit whoring, I'd mention all of those
proper names (and the gun's nomenclature, and its caliber, and the
certain self defense teacher from a certain other western state who
retired as a commissioned officer from a certain well-regarded
branch of the military to open a certain training facility whose
symbol was a certain black bird and who was famous for popularizing
this gun during the '70s and '80s.)
Once I'd mentioned that gun, and it's designer, and it's caliber,
and everything else a reader might Google, I'd make it hit bait by
writing such things as this certain gun being "the best
EVAHH!!!!!", and this certain designer "the greatest EVAHH!" and
the caliber with which it was most identified as being "the best
EVAHH!!!!" This would be carefully crafted to appeal to the myopic,
die-hard fans of the gun/designer/caliber, and impressionable youth
who can't spell.
I could also engage in reverse hit whoring. That's where I do the
same kind of name-dropping, but instead of fawning praise I write
things like this certain gun being an inefficient, unreliable
example of design-by-committee (the gun's manufacturer and end user
having significant input into the design) or how the gun's inventor
was a hack with limited talent (after all, the guy couldn't even
design a revolver.) That is, if I wanted to engage in such
nonsense.
You'll kindly notice that I've not mentioned anything or anyone
specifically, and because I was careful not to use any common
search terms or proper names in any of the preceding no one is
going to find this original post by Googling. That means I'm not a
hit whore, which means I can't monetize my blog, which accounts for
the fact that I'm not rich!
So much for virtue.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: bloggers
Monday, December 06, 2010
Not much to say right now. I'm in the midst of my annual push to
get as much out the door for Xmas as I can, and today blogging
takes the backseat.
-=[ Grant ]=-
Monday, November 22, 2010
You may notice that commenting has changed. For the last several
years I've been using HaloScan/ECHO/JSKit, and my account is up for
renewal next month. The company decided that they needed to
dramatically increase the cost of their service, do I've jumped
ship to Disqus. The look is different, and it has a bigger choice
of options for both you and me.
Unfortunately the existing comments from JSKit didn't import
properly, so it looks like we've lost those. I'm still working on
it, though!
-=[
Grant ]=-
Monday, November 08, 2010
Two people I know have started new blogs in the last week or so,
and I believe they're both worth your time to check out.
Fellow instructor Omari Broussard and I met at the Combat Focus
Shooting Instructor Development course I recently
mentioned. Omari's done a lot of
training in armed and unarmed combatives, and he's kept a logbook
(multiple logbooks, actually) of all the courses he's attended. His
blog is called, appropriately enough, the Training Log
Blog.
Keeping a training log is an idea endorsed by a wide range of
instructors. Doing so gives you a legal record, a way of reminding
yourself of lessons learned, a chronology of your development as a
student, a chronicle of your evolution in thought, or perhaps just
an opportunity to reminisce about good times and good people. A
training log is all of these things, and more. So important is this
process that Rob Pincus wrote the Training Log Book to make it
easier to keep up with the task.
In my case I've been remiss about doing this. Despite my slightly
OCD nature I've just not been as disciplined about this as I should
be. Omari, however, has kept detailed logs over the past several
years, and his blog is all about sharing those many entries with
you. Expect to learn what's important to him, what he's changed his
mind about, and how he's grown through what he's learned. Omari's
blog stands a good chance of becoming
the must-read blog for those who
are serious about their training and personal growth. He's off to a
great start.
Speaking of Rob Pincus (what a segue!), you're probably familiar
with him from his articles in SWAT Magazine - or perhaps his
television appearances, his DVD instructional series, or maybe even
his books (the aforementioned Training Log Book, and his
essential Combat Focus Shooting: Evolution
2010.) Rob's always in the
public eye, but there's something you don't know about him.
He's homeless. By choice. He decided that would be a good name for
a blog, and so it was born.
The Homeless By Choice
blog details Rob's life without a
permanent residence. Rob travels more than three hundred days a
year, and a while back he decided that it was silly to maintain a
home base that he never saw. He put all his stuff in storage and
resolved to live on the road as a preferred condition.
I know that doesn't sound so unusual, as many people live full time
in motorhomes and have no fixed residence, but Rob doesn't have an
RV - he lives in hotels with what he can carry on his back! The HBC
blog covers his life on the road: where he goes, what he does,
where he stays, the people he meets and the things he sees.
If you ever wanted to read a blog where you could actually live
vicariously through someone else, HBC is definitely it!
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: bloggers, rob.pincus, combat.focus
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Sorry for the lack of posting yesterday - I was occupied with more
pressing matters. The series on the Rhino revolver will resume
tomorrow.
I couldn't let this pass, however. Seems that Alan
over at Snarkybytes wants to do away with
Traditional Safety Rule #1, "all guns are always loaded" (or
variants thereof.)
Welcome to the club, Alan - I've been saying the same
thing for
over three years now, and caught the same
flak that you're now getting.
The comments over at his place are very similar to the comments
that I got (and continue to get.) For whatever reason, people are
convinced that the more 'rules' they have to follow, the safer
they'll be. (Of course they'll argue the opposite about gun laws,
the irony being lost on them.) They present all manner of
convoluted arguments and frantic re-wording to avoid the very
thought of doing with fewer gun handling guidelines despite the
logical probability that those fewer guidelines would prove more
effective.
(There is that rabid subset of Cooper acolytes who oppose any
change simply because The Colonel didn't approve of it, but their
numbers appear to be dwindling.)
I have a couple of nits to pick: "Keeping the finger off the
trigger" isn't specific enough for my comfort level; I prefer
"finger out of the triggerguard", as simply ‘off the
trigger’ does nothing to prevent stumble/grasp accidents.
Second, while I understand his argument (and even agree with it to
a great degree) about knowing your target and what’s behind
it, I believe there needs to be something that addresses things
like aerial shotgunning and proper backstopping for dry fire
practice. Hence my third rule, though I’m willing to consider
that I’m being needlessly redundant.
My modest proposal is that safety rules should be taught
thusly:
Never point a gun - any gun, loaded or
unloaded - at anything you are not willing to shoot.
Keep your finger out of the triggerguard until you are ready to
fire.
Know where your shots will land and what they’ll touch along
the way.
Alan's chart is pretty good,
though, and I wish I'd thought of it!
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: safety, bloggers
Friday, April 16,
2010
I'd like to try a little experiment next week (4/19-4/23), and do
my updates on Twitter and Facebook via the iPhone. It's possible
that I'll go stir-crazy and just have to fire up the blog software
on the computer, but I'd really like to try a minimalist approach.
If it works out I may pick up the software to integrate my blog's
self-contained software (which the iPhone can't access) to Blogger
(which the iPhone can use.)
Wish me luck, and watch my Twitter and Facebook pages next week!
-=[
Grant ]=-
Wednesday, March 31,
2010
Have several deadlines and projects I'm juggling this week, so
blogging has to take a backseat.
As someone once said, “today’s not your day.
Tomorrow’s not looking good, either!”
-=[
Grant ]=-
Wednesday, March 17,
2010
After Monday's
post several people emailed links
to various threads on various forums, asking "is this the one you
were talking about?" In each case I had to respond that no, it
wasn’t; the incident in question was some months ago, and I
was just getting around to writing about it.
(That’s the way things go around here. Sometimes the words
flow easily, while other times I start writing but hit a brick wall
halfway through. When that happens I step away and just let it
percolate in my mind. Occasionally it will emerge as something
coherent, but it might be weeks or months later.)
The reason for the apparent recognition of the thread is because
those kinds of cyber-bashing exchanges are a constant in the gun
forums. As my late father used to say, "you can't swing a dead cat
without hitting one!"
I did find one or two of the links to be pretty amusing, however.
Thanks for sending them!
Stay tuned - I'll have that book report for you next Monday.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Monday, March 01,
2010
NEW
ARTICLE UP - Check out my latest
article, Dealing With The Double Action
Trigger, at the Personal Defense
Network!
COWBOY TACTICAL - Don't know if I learned of
this from Tam or Uncle, but it's funny either way! From
Cemetery’s Gun Blob:

GREAT
INTERVIEWS - The ProArms Podcast recently
featured interviews with Gila Hayes and Kathy
Jackson, regarding their respective
books: Personal Defense for Women and Lessons from Armed America. Highly recommended
listening (and reading!)
A
LITTLE RECOGNITION - Many people have asked about
the site's redesign. The site is built in RapidWeaver; the theme is
from Nick Cates Design. Last week I received an email from Nick,
who said he was impressed how I'd used his template. He asked if he
could feature grantcunningham.com in his Showcase, and of course I
said yes! You can see it
here.
HOUSEKEEPING
- You may notice that the tag
cloud has changed a bit. I wasn't happy with how I'd handled the
tags, so I erased them and started over. Hopefully what you see now
is an improvement in usability.
A
LITTLE MORE HUMOR - I ran across this link in my
archives, and couldn't resist posting it again: How Gun Magazines Write
Articles.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: proarms, women, books, personal.defense.network
Monday, February 01,
2010
I made a slight mistake updating the blog this morning, and wiped
out all but a few of my previous articles. The problem has now been
fixed, so please have a look over the last few entries and make
sure you didn't miss anything.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: my.bad
Saturday, October 17,
2009
Yes, I know I didn't have a Surprise for you yesterday. I'd
intended to present instead the latest installment of the Self
Defense Thoughts, but fell asleep.
I write most of my blog articles in the evening, then finish them
up and post them at breakfast. On Thursday evening I fell asleep,
and Friday I had to get up very early (and miss my breakfast!) so
that I could be somewhere first thing in the morning. The blog got
ignored in the rush that ensued.
The latest installment of the series follows. Enjoy!
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: my.bad
Monday, May 11,
2009
Yesterday was the third anniversary of the Revolver Liberation
Alliance blog. It doesn't seem like I've been doing this for the
last three years and five-hundred-some-odd posts!
At the beginning, the RLA was long on personal commentary on
happenings in (and slightly outside of) the shooting world. Many of
my early posts were links to other's articles, with my comments
added. While this is the recipe that many other successful bloggers
have used, for me it proved unfulfilling. Oh, I like to snark as
much as the next guy (or
gal),
but that's not my
raison d'ętre - I prefer the role of
teacher to that of critic.
It's in that spirit that I started writing more original (and
factual) content. My opinions still come through, of course, in the
subject matter I choose and the way in which I approach it, but my
goal is to bring solid information to my readers. Sometimes the
information is from the side of the 'loyal opposition', sometimes
it's unpopular, and sometimes it's based on analysis and theory,
but it's always supported by evidence. I'm not a believer in snake
oil!
Some entries are better than others, of course, and some prove
vastly more popular. I'm particularly fond of certain articles:
the failings of traditional safety rules; basics of
aesthetics
as applied to revolvers; myths about
stopping power; and judging your
abilities.
Along the way I've picked up many loyal readers. I've been
fortunate to have some very knowledgeable and important industry
members check in from time to time, and I've had the misfortune of
being fooled by one of them. Still, I won't consider my work
successful until it's been attributed to Major Caudill, a travesty to which I'm
looking forward.
Sometimes what I write has profound effects on the reader. I got an
email a while back from a fellow who said that my scribblings had
helped him decide on the direction his life should take, and is now
happily employed in an important position in the shooting
community. I am humbled, and pledge to keep doing what I'm doing,
to the best of my ability.
Now to the fourth year. I just hope I don't run out of things to
say!
-=[
Grant ]=-
Monday, April 13,
2009
I continue to get email from last year's
"Self defense, stopping power, and caliber"
series. It remains the second-most
visited page on the site, behind only my article on lubrication,
and appears to be well received by the majority of readers. Thank
you!
As you might imagine, such popularity generates feedback, and some
questions pop up more than once. While not exactly a FAQ, here are
some of the common emails I've received.
Email:
You didn't cover the difference between crush and temporary
cavities, which I think is very important.
My
answer:
No, I didn't - because I don't consider it critical to the
discussion. You see, I really don't care what the wounding
mechanism is, as long as one exists. Going back to the article, as
long as the bullet a) reaches something that the body finds
immediately important, and b) does rapid and significant damage to
that thing when it arrives, then I'm really unconcerned about how
it actually does so.
Email:
Can you comment on ammo from [a smaller maker], whose stuff is just
as good but doesn't waste money on
advertising?
My
answer:
In general, I recommend that one avoid "boutique ammunition." The
majority (if not all) of such ammo purveyors are simply loading
bullets made by someone else, but without the knowledge of how to
make those bullets perform their best. Why should I risk unknown
quality control to get a product that, at best, can only be as good
as what I can get from a producer that has actual design and test
budgets? My advice is to stick with known quantities: Winchester,
Speer, Federal, Remington.
Email:
What's your opinion of the book "Handgun Stopping Power" (aka
"Street Stoppers", aka 'Marshall &
Sanow')?
My
answer:
There are a number of solid, critical analyses of their work
online; I suggest that you read some of them, as the problems with
their "research" are both serious and numerous. In case I was too
subtle in the articles, I consider stopping power ratings in
general to be complete hogwash, and theirs are particularly
so.
You'd be further ahead to take the money you would have spent on
their book, and practice until you can shoot to a high standard of
accuracy under stress. Couple that with a quality hollowpoint from
a major manufacturer, and you'll be much better prepared than any
ten people who swear by their scribblings.
(This should not be construed to mean that I am a follower of their
chief antagonist, Dr. Martin Fackler, either. He concocted his
ratings from a different sort of nonsense than Marshall &
Sanow, and came to different conclusions - which were just as
useless. Again, there is criticism of his work that can be found on
the 'net, if one is so inclined.)
Email:
Is there any reliable source of information on bullet
performance?
My
answer:
Because of the huge number of variables in any shooting, and the
relatively low number of incidents, the idea of hard statistical
data is meaningless. What we're left with is anecdotal evidence
which, while not valid in a scientific sense, does give us some
rough feeling for what is and is not working. That's the best we
can do under the circumstances.
One of the more prolific collectors of such information is Massad
Ayoob. He is in a unique position: since he travels all over the
country both as a trainer and an expert witness, he's thrown into
contact with large numbers of police trainers and shooting
survivors. He elicits their opinions of their issue ammunition,
based on shootings in their departments. He gets some great
feedback, which he doesn't try to disguise or characterize as
anything other than raw opinion from people who have actual results
to talk about.
If you want to hear some of Ayoob's findings direct from the man
himself, listen to this episode of the ProArms
podcast.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: stopping.power, magic.bullets
Monday, March 02,
2009
I'm gratified - and somewhat surprised - at the tremendous response
to last week's post "Risk
assessment, or lack thereof." One of the difficulties I've
found with this whole blog adventure is predicting what will
resonate with my readers. In some cases I've been deliberatively
provocative in order to get people to think outside of their
comfort zone, while in others I've tried to deliver solid technical
information not readily available in the swamp that is the
internet.
On occasion (as with the article under consideration) I worry about
whether I'm talking over my audience, that the subject might be a
bit too abstract. I'm happy to find that my readers are
significantly more discerning than average.
---
One complaint about the Bianchi SpeedStrips is that they're not
available in calibers other than .38/.357. I'm surprised that,
until tipped off by a reader, I didn't know about
Quick
Strips from Tuff Products. They appear to be a clone
of the Bianchi product, but are available in a wide range of
calibers. Check 'em out.
---
You may have heard that the U.S. Attorney General called (not
surprisingly) for reinstating the infamous Assault Weapons Ban.
What was surprising was Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's adamant
refusal to consider such legislation. Mr. Obama's administration
may find their road tougher sledding than they'd originally
anticipated. All the better for us!
---
A while back I wrote about the iPhone/iTouch ballistics application
iSnipe. While it worked well, it was pretty basic; as I explained
to the author, it needed some features added to enhance utility for
the serious long-range shooter.
It didn't take long for competition to appear: Ballistic
FTE has everything I ever
wanted, and then some. It is superb in every respect; you must see
the target recording function! It even has a calculator to help
with rangefinding (mil-dot) reticle use. Ballistic FTE is a bargain
at $9.99.
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: apps
Wednesday, July 02,
2008
I've added a link to
my
"Stopping Power" series to the Library. I have no idea why I
didn't think of doing so earlier!
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: stopping.power
Monday, October 22,
2007
If you've hung around here
for any length of time, you've noticed that on Mondays and
Wednesdays I try to keep the blog somewhat on the topic of
firearms, preferably on revolvers.
Today is not going to be one of those days.
Why? I was so busy over the weekend I didn't even get a chance to
think about the blog, let alone write anything! Well, that - and
the fact that my elbow hurts like heck!
As you may recall, I'm suffering from a very painful occurrence of
tendonitis in my right elbow. So painful, in fact, that it hurts to
type! As I mentioned last week I took it fairly easy for several
days, and was feeling vast improvement until I did something so
innocuous that I am startled at the outcome. It involved a Junkyard
Dog.
No, not the kind you're thinking of - this kind of Junkyard Dog.
As it happens I live equidistant from the knife companies of
Kershaw and Benchmade (and, by extension, the firms of Gerber,
Leatherman, and Lone Wolf Knives. I guess you could call this
"Edged Alley"!) Over the years I've bought many Benchmade knives,
and generally avoided the Kershaw brand. Kershaw just didn't have
the quality of blade that I desire in my knives, and despite having
met Pete Kershaw himself I was never persuaded to carry one of his
products.
When Kershaw moved a lot of their production from overseas to right
here in my own stompin' grounds they got my interest, but not
enough to make me want to put one of their products in my pocket
every day. It was when I found that they were transitioning from
the use of cheap 440A and 440C steels to Sandvik steels that I
became truly interested.
(Bear with me - this does eventually get back to my
tendonitis!)
I have quite a bit of experience with Sandvik blades, particularly
with their 12C27 steel as used in the famous Swedish Mora knives. It is, in my estimation,
one of the better 'all around' steels that one could use on a
general purpose knife. It holds an edge well, is very resistant to
breakage, and is easy to sharpen. The fact that there were almost
no folders made out of that superb yet underrated steel annoyed me
greatly, and I was left to console myself with my Moras.
It was when I found out that Kershaw had gone to Sandvik steel
(13C26, a very close relative of 12C27) that I decided I had to
have one. The Junkyard Dog II had gotten rave reviews over
at Bladeforums, so I decided that I was to
get one.
(Luckily my wife intervened, and got one for me as a gift, thus
saving me from the guilt of buying it for myself!)
It arrived at the end of last week, and from the start I was
smitten with it. Fit and finish is quite good, easily up to the
Benchmades that I own, and at the price point it is astounding. I
haven't gotten a chance to resharpen the edge and really test it
yet (any factory edge is downright primitive compared to what a few
minutes with a set of stones can achieve), but I expect great
things.
The trouble is that the blade is really quite heavy, and flicking
it open delivers a solid "whack" to one's muscles. I was
absentmindedly doing that while watching television the other
night: opening and closing it repeatedly, just because it's fun to
do. After about a half-hour of such foolishness I found that my
elbow was as sore as it ever was, and then some!
So now you have, as Paul Harvey would say, "the rest of the
story."
-=[
Grant ]=-
Tags: knives
Wednesday, February 07,
2007
A regular reader sent me a note
that, essentially, asked if I weren't a little daffy for talking
about (promoting) other gunsmiths.
Quick answer: I don't think so.
In any endeavor, there are people who stand out from the crowd,
whose peers agree are worthy of recognition and serve as
inspirations to others. Gunsmithing is no exception, and those who
do high grade work deserve a bit of fanfare.
The tone of the email suggested that I would be cutting my own
throat (in an economic sense) by giving another gunsmith free
publicity. While it's a possibility, I suppose, I'm not all that
worried; after all, I refer people to other gunsmiths on a regular
basis when I can't provide what they seek. In the case of Hamilton
Bowen, if someone needs the kind of service he specializes in I'm
happy to make a connection for them!
In what can sometimes be a contentious, egotistical business maybe
I can do my part to civilize things, if only a little bit. Call it
my small contribution to the field!
-=[ Grant ]=-