<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
	<channel>
<title>The Revolver Liberation Alliance</title><link>http://www.grantcunningham.com/index.html</link><description>A Blog from www.grantcunningham.com</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:creator>www.grantcunningham.com</dc:creator><dc:rights>Copyright 2006 Grant Cunningham</dc:rights><dc:date>2012-05-16T07:39:39-07:00</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.realmacsoftware.com/" />
<admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:www.grantcunningham.com" /><sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 07:43:17 -0700</lastBuildDate><item><title>Moore&#x2019;s Patent Revolver.</title><dc:creator>www.grantcunningham.com</dc:creator><category>Revolvers</category><category>History</category><category>Shooting industry</category><dc:date>2012-05-16T07:39:39-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/4801ae77a4ac48ff10940db11a54d7d8-1021.html#unique-entry-id-1021</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/4801ae77a4ac48ff10940db11a54d7d8-1021.html#unique-entry-id-1021</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Someone else?), but it has a great article on Moore&rsquo;s Patent Revolver - the first revolver with a swing-out cylinder (though not quite of the kind we're used to.)


It's also interesting in that it was one of the many guns which violated Rollin White's bored-through cylinder patent.   History buffs may recall that White was a Colt employee who first presented his idea to allow a revolver cylinder to chamber metallic cartridges to his boss, Colonel Colt. ...  White knew he was onto something, and left Colt to market his patent.


Messieurs Smith and Wesson, enterprising and astute gentlemen that they were, knew a good thing when they saw it and licensed White's patent.   This agreement was really the foundation of their new handgun company, and they used it to produce their first revolver - the Model 1.   That patent made Smith and Wesson rich, allowed them to grow like crazy relative to Colt, and should have made White rich too. 

...Moore, like many others, used White's patent without license - and White was obligated to go after his revolver and his company.   White would sue, win, and then Smith & Wesson would somehow end up acquiring the infringing guns - which they would sell themselves.   (I've never read the licensing agreement, so I can't be sure exactly how that transpired, but Moore's case isn't the only example.)


Ironically, Moore's company survived and was purchased by White's old employer, Colt, in 1870.   More ironically, while Moore survived White's fortune didn't; his defense of his patent cost him nearly everything he made in royalties.
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Monday Meanderings: hi-cap revolvers&#x2c; Rhode&#x2019;s life&#x2c; and I&#x2019;m no anglophile.</title><dc:creator>www.grantcunningham.com</dc:creator><category>Current Events</category><category>Revolvers</category><dc:date>2012-05-14T08:33:45-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/2301b26a6bcea85355211c3e0d378860-1020.html#unique-entry-id-1020</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/2301b26a6bcea85355211c3e0d378860-1020.html#unique-entry-id-1020</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[- Not sure where I got this, but it's pretty interesting: a three-barrel revolver.   What will people think of next?!? 

...- Seems that Kim Rhode, ace Olympic shotgunner and ambassador for the shooting sports, has a blog.   Hope she finds time to post more often.   (Who knew she was a fan of bacon-wrapped meatloaf?)


- Speaking of Kim: I'm still a little miffed that they removed her original event - women's double trap - from the Olympics, but left the men's division. ...  No one knows for sure, but likely because some of them uppity females were beatin' the menfolk.   There are lots of countries represented on the Olympic Committee, not all of them known for their enlightened attitudes regarding a woman&rsquo;s place in society.  


- An article in The Economist (a magazine which often displays a raw anti-American bias, yet is revered by Americans who somehow consider themselves unbiased for having read it) talks about gun ownership in the U.S.   It states that while gun sales are way up, the number of households owning guns has declined steadily since 1973 - the implication that guns are being purchased only by those evil "gun nuts."   Their position doesn't square with my observations, and I've yet to find any corroboration for it.   Can anyone comment authoritatively on their claim?
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>FRIDAY SURPRISE: Technology ain&#x27;t what it used to be.</title><dc:creator>www.grantcunningham.com</dc:creator><category>Friday Surprise&#x21;</category><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2012-05-11T07:29:52-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/10dbd3c8a00c3b79b1aa734fd0b98fed-1019.html#unique-entry-id-1019</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/10dbd3c8a00c3b79b1aa734fd0b98fed-1019.html#unique-entry-id-1019</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[One of my little obsessions is simplistic technology.   This usually means older technology, that which is less complicated and (ironically) many times better for us and our environment.


It was with tremendous joy, then, that I stumbled upon a great website devoted to Luddites like me: Low Tech Magazine.   There you'll find articles on simple technology, obsolete technology, and even technology myths.   It will probably vie for a large portion of my recreational time; well, when I get any it certainly will.


(Yes, I realize the contradictions inherent in extolling the virtues of old technology on a computer network.   I consider such juxtapositions an art form.)


-=[ Grant ]=-]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Some thoughts on round counts and reliability.</title><dc:creator>www.grantcunningham.com</dc:creator><category>General gun stuff</category><category>Self defense</category><dc:date>2012-05-09T08:30:41-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/30354757f6edc0a7160520b66b3c19a0-1018.html#unique-entry-id-1018</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/30354757f6edc0a7160520b66b3c19a0-1018.html#unique-entry-id-1018</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[What follows came up in a discussion about the reliability of 1911 pistols, but is actually universally applicable: to Glocks, SIGs, HKs, rifles, shotguns - and, yes, revolvers.


The context of the discussion was the validity of looking at failures during a training class as indicative of larger problems.   It usually takes a form similar to "I'm not going to fire 1,000 rounds in self defense, so a gun problem in a class proves nothing; my gun is reliable enough for the 10 rounds it's going to take."


The statement is valid - no one is going to fire 500 or 1,000 rounds in self defense - but the conclusion isn't.


A gun which is carried for self defense continuously deteriorates in terms of its operational condition.   Lubricants ooze out and evaporate, while lint and dirt work their way into and onto the operating surfaces.   A gun which has been carried without stripping, cleaning and re-oiling for a few weeks may in fact be at the same level of cleanliness, and the oil and grease at the same level of lubricity, as a gun which has just fired 500 or more rounds. 

...Now you might say that a failure at 600 or 700 rounds is immaterial because you never will shoot it that much in real life, but consider this: the gun that's been riding around in its holster for a while may in fact be a lot closer in terms of operational condition to that 600 round mark than you might believe.   Since malfunctions are, at some level, random, that gun may be at the brink of malfunction with the first round - or second or third - that's fired in defense of its owner. 

...This is why it's important to test your self defense gun thoroughly, and yes - that means a days where you shoot 500 or more rounds through it without cleaning, oiling, or otherwise pampering the thing.   It's not to prove that the gun will shoot that many rounds without malfunction; it's a way of helping you determine whether the gun will function in the non-pristine condition in which it probably always exists.   The goal should be zero malfunctions, because that's what's necessary when our lives are on the line.
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>An opportunity for a discussion.</title><dc:creator>www.grantcunningham.com</dc:creator><category>General gun stuff</category><category>Revolvers</category><dc:date>2012-05-07T09:38:12-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/716793598a5a1fa24cb3b5a2b1756e47-1017.html#unique-entry-id-1017</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/716793598a5a1fa24cb3b5a2b1756e47-1017.html#unique-entry-id-1017</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Over the weekend Rob Pincus - never one to shy away from a firestorm (I was going to say another kind of storm, but this is a family-friendly blog) -  posted a video on YouTube. 

...version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vMbQYkMoJGo?

...I don't have a problem with the disagreement, mind you (Rob and I discovered some time ago that we share the same feelings about the 1911 pistol, which is probably why we get along), but I do have a problem with the nonsensical responses given by those who disagree.   Here are a couple of the most annoying, and they apply not just to the present discussion but all discussions about guns, cars, or darned near anything else on the planet.


More to the point, they apply to the kinds of responses I receive when I talk about the virtues of the revolver versus an autoloader as a defensive tool; I've heard these same arguments to my opinions, gotten them in emails, and seen them plastered over the 'net. 

...Aside from the issues with making claims about an entire population based on a single data point, there are a couple of problems with this statement. 

...When later he claims that his gun is perfectly reliable, and then is reminded of the incident(s), he can't/won't acknowledge that they ever happened. 

...Please, don't write and tell me about how Todd Jarrett's Paras are so reliable that he made a YouTube vid; he's a sponsored shooter, and both he and his handlers have a vested interest in making sure those "demos" go without a hitch.) 

...Picking a single example to illustrate a broader concept that has statistical validity, as this video does, is not the same as using a single example as the basis for a self-referential supposition. 

...The point is that some devices fail more than others, and we can chart and often predict those failures based on past experience. 


...Availing ourselves of field data, from people who have seen more of it than us, is one way we can make good decisions. 

...(Oh, BTW - I do have some experience with short-barreled 1911s in the form of two Detonics CombatMasters, which some day I'll sell to one of those rabid 1911 fanboys. ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>FRIDAY SURPRISE: Country pride.</title><dc:creator>www.grantcunningham.com</dc:creator><category>Friday Surprise&#x21;</category><category>My Life</category><dc:date>2012-05-04T07:26:21-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/3a31b7c7149932a9be02aaa7aac32cc1-1016.html#unique-entry-id-1016</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/3a31b7c7149932a9be02aaa7aac32cc1-1016.html#unique-entry-id-1016</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[My morning routine is pretty consistent; I get up between 5:30 and 5:45, start a fire in the woodstove, grab a cup of tea, and sit down with Tyler The Overindulged Rabbit to watch a program on PBS called "America's Heartland", which comes on at 6:am. 


The show celebrates the people in this country who do the hard work to provide us with food, clothes, lumber and all manner of other products.   A simple fact of life on earth is that everything we have, everything you see around you, was either grown or mined.   This show celebrates the growers (and sometimes the miners - they had a segment on salt mining not too long ago.)


I'm proud of having grown up with loggers, farmers and ranchers, and it's time they got some good press.   America's Heartland exists to do just that, and you don't need to tune into PBS to watch it - their website has every one of their episodes, spanning seven years, streamed.   You can even search for segments that were filmed in any particular state.


After today's segment on peach growers I'm a little hungry.   Thanks to the farmers, I'm going to have breakfast!


-=[ Grant ]=-]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Maybe we don&#x27;t have it so bad after all.</title><dc:creator>www.grantcunningham.com</dc:creator><category>General gun stuff</category><dc:date>2012-05-02T08:33:53-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/587aed849a2a748b434d097d2b2db10f-1015.html#unique-entry-id-1015</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/587aed849a2a748b434d097d2b2db10f-1015.html#unique-entry-id-1015</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[If Monday's post got you a little envious, today's should fix you right up.


I got an email the other day from a reader in Thailand (of all places!)   He had read my book and was looking for some recommendations with regard to a home defense gun.   He also shared with me the gun situation in his country. 


In Thailand, you must have permission from the authorities to purchase a gun.   You have to submit to a fingerprint check and give them bank statements, plus have letters of recommendation from your employer.   The waiting period starts at three months, and that's if you're asking to buy a common caliber (.22, .38, or 9mm.)   If you want any other caliber, particularly if it's larger than 9mm, the wait time goes up.


Guns and ammunition are, according to the email, incredibly expensive. ...  Once you've bought the gun (and it's very likely you'll only be able to buy one in your entire lifetime), you have to feed the thing - and if you want quality (U.S. made) ammunition, it'll run you $3 per round. 

...So, stop whining about how ammo in this country is getting expensive and how much guns cost these days.   Our friends in Thailand have it much worse off, and yet they persevere to give themselves the most efficient self protection tools they can. 
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Even I&#x27;d buy one at that price.</title><dc:creator>www.grantcunningham.com</dc:creator><category>General gun stuff</category><category>Legal Issues</category><dc:date>2012-04-30T08:47:12-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/b7c1de1b9ae7b38e736e0f67e2114e27-1014.html#unique-entry-id-1014</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/b7c1de1b9ae7b38e736e0f67e2114e27-1014.html#unique-entry-id-1014</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I had something else planned for today, but it wasn't nearly as cool as this!


Over at Forgotten Weapons is a story about visiting a gun show in Belgium.   Now I know we all have a vision of Europe as being devoid of gun ownership (or at least so restricted as to make it impossible to own anything cool), but it would do us well to remember that Europe is the land of the cheap and readily available suppressor. 


Compare that to the file-your-paperwork-and-$200-and-wait-six-months ordeal that owning a simple muffler entails here in The Land Of The Free.


That's not the only thing about which (some) Europeans are more enlightened.   Take a look at the mounds of full-auto military hardware for sale at the aforementioned Belgian show - then look at the prices.   Yes, $1250 for a Dror machine gun.   I don't follow the Class II world at all, but even I know that in comparison to the U.S. that is a screaming, unbelievable, unfathomable deal.   And there are lots more where those came from!


Of course there is the other side of the coin, and on Wednesday I hope to be able to present it to you.   In the meantime, though, may you dream pleasant dreams of cheap Thompsons.


-=[ Grant ]=-]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Ed Harris Friday: Blackpowder Revolvers</title><dc:creator>www.grantcunningham.com</dc:creator><category>Revolvers</category><dc:date>2012-04-27T08:10:25-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/eb0e67e8f714b466e1a900b1d36cd284-1013.html#unique-entry-id-1013</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/eb0e67e8f714b466e1a900b1d36cd284-1013.html#unique-entry-id-1013</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Hold the cylinder up to the light and ensure you can see daylight through each flash channel, then degrease the chambers with a light volatile solvent such as Outer's Crud Cutter or Birchwood Casey Gun Scrubber and dry with patches. 

...If this doesn't work, the safest way to clear a misfire in a cap & ball revolver is to carefully pry caps from all nipples with a small screwdriver, while wearing safety glasses and pointing the muzzle in a safe direction. ...  Unscrew the offending nipple and carefully pick out the powder with a copper wire or other nonferrous object until you can freely insert a 5/32" diameter straight punch into the chamber until it solidly contacts the base of the ball or bullet. 

...The Lee R.E.A.L. is also available in the .36 caliber, and can be used in cap & ball revolvers of that bore size with the same charges used for round balls.


I recommend a starting load of 20 grs. of FFFg or the same volume of Pyrodex P in the .44 cap & ball revolvers and 16 grs. on the .36 cals. 

...With charges less than 20 grains bulk measure in the .44 replicas or 25 grains in the Ruger Old Army, the stroke of the loading lever is inadequate to compress the charge unless a wad or filler is used. 

...If you cannot feel the charge compress slightly before the end of the rammer stroke, you may need to also pour a bit of Farina, Cream of Wheat or corn meal to take up the empty space in the chambers. 

...Seating a wad over the powder, combined with a tight fitting ball or bullet positively prevents "flashovers", but applying lubricant over round balls is essential to keep the cylinder from binding due to fouling. 

...The substantial hammer notches between the chambers of the Ruger Old Army are much better than the puny "pins" on original Colts, but Sturm, Ruger cautions to load 5 only, and I agree with their advice.


...They emphasize that it does no good whatever to measure velocities while working up a load unless groups are concurrently shot on paper, because uniform velocity does not guarantee accuracy.   Velocity measurement is most valuable after an accurate load has been found, because it defines a measurable parameter and gives at least some chance of being able to approximate the same good results.


...If you don't want to mix your own "Ed's Red" and want a store bought product, you can get fine results cleaning black powder guns with any of the various "waterless hand cleaners" sold in hardware and auto parts stores. ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>McMillan followup.</title><dc:creator>www.grantcunningham.com</dc:creator><category>Current Events</category><category>Shooting industry</category><category>Political Action</category><dc:date>2012-04-25T08:31:17-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/043e77ed1339c7261e664576eb435ce4-1012.html#unique-entry-id-1012</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/043e77ed1339c7261e664576eb435ce4-1012.html#unique-entry-id-1012</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[As chronicled here on Monday, the McMillan companies were told by a VP of Bank of America that their business was no longer desired by the bank - specifically because they manufactured firearms. 

...- The story went national on the Cam Edwards and Glenn Beck shows, as well as all over the internet.   Everyone, it seems, is talking about this.   McMillan has garnered a lot of support, much of it newfound.   (I&rsquo;ve never watched Glenn Beck, but he makes some very good points - particularly about the bank&rsquo;s possible political motivations.   Aside from his obvious partisan stance, some of the things he says about BofA makes one wonder.)


- BofA has posted a spin-doctored and unattributed statement on their Facebook page which suggests Kelly McMillan lied about the whole thing, that they really do support gun owners, and that they support our troops and hire veterans (not sure what that has to do with anything.)   The feedback on their statement has been voluminous and critical, as McMillan is a company known for ethical and honest behavior, while BofA is - well, not so much.


- McMillan reports that they've had a number of banks call on them to get their business, and will be making a decision soon.   Seems that there are banks which would love to do business with an upstanding manufacturer like McMillan, and they may in fact have a new problem: too many good banks to choose from!


It&rsquo;s worth noting that this whole thing started on Facebook and is being played out there, which in my mind solidifies the value of social media as both a source of breaking information and a vehicle for grassroots action. 

...Oh, and don&rsquo;t bank or do business with BofA.
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Bank of America: just say &#x22;no&#x22;.</title><dc:creator>www.grantcunningham.com</dc:creator><category>Current Events</category><category>Political Action</category><category>Shooting industry</category><dc:date>2012-04-23T07:30:48-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/7214f552db1b4817f9b586e6bc55cc53-1011.html#unique-entry-id-1011</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/7214f552db1b4817f9b586e6bc55cc53-1011.html#unique-entry-id-1011</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[In case you've missed the flap, last week Kelly McMillan (of the companies which bear the family name) posted to Facebook that he'd been visited by a senior VP of Bank of America, the company that's handled his company's banking needs for more than a decade. 

...McMillan Fiberglass Stocks, McMillan Firearms Manufacturing, McMillan Group International have been collectively banking with Bank of America for 12 years. ...  He scheduled the meeting as an &ldquo;account analysis&rdquo; meeting in order to evaluate the two lines of credit we have with them.   He spent 5 minutes talking about how McMillan has changed in the last 5 years and have become more of a firearms manufacturer than a supplier of accessories.<br>


...At this point I interrupted him and asked &ldquo;Can I possible save you some time so that you don&rsquo;t waste your breath?   What you are going to tell me is that because we are in the firearms manufacturing business you no longer want my business.&rdquo;<br>


...We can find a 2nd Amendment friendly bank that will be glad to have our business.   You won&rsquo;t mind if I tell the NRA, SCI and everyone one I know that BofA is not firearms industry friendly?&rdquo;

...At which point I told him that the meeting was over and there was nothing let for him to say.<br>


...I think it is import for all Americans who believe in and support our 2nd amendment right to keep and bear arms should know when a business does not support these rights. ...  When I don&rsquo;t agree with a business&rsquo; political position I can not in good conscience support them.   We will soon no longer be accepting Bank of America credit cards as payment for our products.<br>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>FRIDAY SURPRISE: And we thought we were SO hot back then.</title><dc:creator>www.grantcunningham.com</dc:creator><category>Friday Surprise&#x21;</category><category>Technology</category><category>Shooting industry</category><dc:date>2012-04-20T08:40:17-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/2cd281a4fb16c4b345f643d571c6ee8a-1010.html#unique-entry-id-1010</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/2cd281a4fb16c4b345f643d571c6ee8a-1010.html#unique-entry-id-1010</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I can remember leisure suits (though thankfully I was only a teenager when they were popular), when gas prices hit $1 for the first time ("a dollar for a gallon of gas?   What's this world coming to?"), the first "brick" cel phones (only the truly important, really rich, or incredibly vain carried them), and looking at computer magazines drooling over 5mb hard disk drives. 

...I remember when the first PCs came out with a hard drive as a very expensive option.   The Shugart ST-506 drive was 5mb capacity and cost something like $1500; it was soon replaced by the ST-412 10mb drive which was considerably less expensive and thus far more popular. 


When MS-DOS v3.0 came out it supported a FAT16 file system architecture, which allowed drive sizes up to 32mb.   There was a sudden jump to the larger capacity, and there were several 30mb or 32mb drives to choose from.


Up to then drives for microcomputers were all of the 5.25" size. ...  Little did we suspect that things would get much smaller and of much higher capacity very quickly. 

...For some time I had a DEC PDP-11/70 in my garage, complete with a DEC RM02 Hard Disk Unit.   That hard drive was the size of a dishwasher, weighed over 400lbs, used a removable five-platter disk pack measuring 14" in diameter, and held - get ready for it -  a grand total of 67mb of data!


Today I have a couple of 1tb drives in a RAID the size of a box of graham crackers. 

...This was all brought to mind by a neat article on the downsizing of computer storage at the Colganology blog. ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>I&#x27;ve updated my class schedule&#x21;</title><dc:creator>www.grantcunningham.com</dc:creator><category>What&#x27;s New&#x21;</category><category>Techniques &#x26; Training</category><dc:date>2012-04-18T19:29:28-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/3a3d0aecc94aed6b28aff1373409fd13-1009.html#unique-entry-id-1009</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/3a3d0aecc94aed6b28aff1373409fd13-1009.html#unique-entry-id-1009</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[There are now two new classes on the schedule, and both of them right here in Oregon! 


I'll be teaching my Defensive Revolver Fundamentals class on July 1st, and Combat Focus Shooting on September 9th.   Both classes will be held in the picturesque town of Canby, Oregon, which is in the beautiful Willamette Valley - a short drive from Portland International Airport, for those of you from out-of-state!   To enroll in either of these classes, drop me an email.


Of course don't forget my classes in College Station, Texas in May.   I'll be teaching both Defensive Revolver Fundamentals and Combat Focus Shooting on the weekend of May 19th & 20th.   To get into either (or both!)   of these courses, send an email to Greg Taggart at GKTTxAg@aol.com


I'm looking forward to meeting you on the range!


-=[ Grant ]=-]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The shake-up at Taurus.</title><dc:creator>www.grantcunningham.com</dc:creator><category>Revolvers</category><category>Shooting industry</category><dc:date>2012-04-18T08:45:05-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/2dd1de1244cddf55231ed4d19fc06884-1008.html#unique-entry-id-1008</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/2dd1de1244cddf55231ed4d19fc06884-1008.html#unique-entry-id-1008</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I found his avowed commitment to change at the company interesting, especially since reports are that he replaced quite a number of the "old guard" folks when he took up his new position. 

...From what I hear, there's been some of the latter - and aside from their formation of a new shooting team with Jessie Harrison, we've yet to see much of the former. 


The TTAG piece is something of a coincidence because just a couple of days ago I was looking at the traffic reports for this site, including the search terms which bring people here.   A HUGE percentage of the people who come here from Google do so because of a search about Taurus guns.   My piece "Why I don't work on Taurus revolvers" has become the single most-read page on this site. 


...This shocked me, because when I wrote that piece I wasn't thinking about search rankings - just addressing the very real issues of Taurus quality and why it's not worth my client's money for me to work on the things.   The comments on that blog entry are a mix of "I think they're great and you're an idiot" to "you're right and I'll never spend another dime on one of their products."


We don't really know what Google's algorithms for search results are, but one speculation is that they adjust over time to reflect (among a whole host of other things) those sites that are the most often visited for any given search term. 

...It should be clear, based on my comments over a long period of time, that I have something of a love-hate relationship with Taurus.   I like some of the unique things they do (except the freaking Judge line, of course), but I'm continually let down by their random quality control and indifferent engineering.   Their revolvers are probably the best thing they make - I've heard very little other than horror stories about their autoloaders - but even those need serious attention if they're going to be considered in the same league with Ruger and Smith & Wesson. 


I hope Kresser can make headway at Taurus, as I'd like to someday be able to brag about having one in my holster. 
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>A new security blog.</title><dc:creator>www.grantcunningham.com</dc:creator><category>Self defense</category><dc:date>2012-04-16T09:10:51-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/a2a33c6b6e957edca06c5f088bebed60-1007.html#unique-entry-id-1007</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/a2a33c6b6e957edca06c5f088bebed60-1007.html#unique-entry-id-1007</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Over the last month or so I've started following a new blog devoted to security. 


Though his focus is on information security and the technology behind it, Bruce Schneier also has some very interesting thoughts on security in general.   His perspective is pretty intriguing, and so his Schneier on Security blog has been added to my daily RSS feed. 


Not many blogs make that grade, but his is good enough that I look forward to reading it regularly. 


A recent entry deals with the idea of bomb threats as a denial-of-service tactic.   This hits home, as a local college faced just this scenario a few weeks ago. 


-=[ Grant ]=-]]></content:encoded></item></channel>
</rss>
